8½

A harried movie director retreats into his memories and fantasies.

A harried movie director retreats into his memories and fantasies. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Otto e Mezzo - Federico Fellini (1963)Other117391.37 GB
Download   8½ (Eight and a half) 1963 Fellini 720p mkvOther8345697.34 MB
Download   Eight and a half - 8 1/2Other69341.67 GB
Download   Eight And A Half (1963) 720p BRrip_sujaidr (pimprg)BRRip52521.3 GB
Download   Otto.E.Mezzo[1963]XviD.Cody'sDVDripDVDRip57321.93 GB
Download   Eight and a Half [1963] Ita + Eng subs 1080pOther33384 GB
Download   8 ½ - Fellini (CRITERION/DVD5/NTSC)DVDR44384 GB
Download   8½.Eight.And.A.Half.1963.720p.BluRay.x264-DiMENSiONBRRip49534 GB
Download   Eight.and.a.Half.1963.Bluray.640p.H264BRRip33401.37 GB
Download   Eight.and.a.Half.1963.BluRay.1080pBRRip40344 GB
Download   Eight.And.A.Half.1963.1080p.BluRay.x264-CHDBRRip26434 GB
Download   Otto E Mezzo 1963 NL sub avi (MovieNight)Other4128702.43 MB
Download   Federico Fellini - Otto e mezzo - 1963.isoOther30474 GB
Download   Eight.and.a.Half.1963.x264.AC3-WAFOther34302.06 GB

8½ torrent reviews

sabrina i (br) wrote: The film is a decent effort but almost letdown completely by the acting. It's chock full of inexperienced actors who are trying their best but the problem is you can tell they are trying their best LOL. Imran Khan has a long way to go..hopefully one day he will grow to be a good actor and with some screen presence, he clearly can't carry a film. This film is produced by his uncle and that's the only reason he's in it. The script, is good but not great, the injection of lame humor was just plain BAD, it was not needed. They should have just concentrated on the main leads.I think this film was a big hit in India. I can see why, the love story is told in a more fresh manner than other Bollywood films but that doesn't mean theres anything new to say here or anything that hasn't been done before. It's just feels a little more fresh and it didn't adhere to excesses which is probably why it kept my attention. If a director like Karan Johar was directing this, I would have turned it off long ago. Overall, if you want to see an stale story told in a fresh manner-watch this.

Michael L (kr) wrote: Not the greatest of Stephen Chow's comedies but not the worst either. Chingamy Yau potrays the innocent gitl next door - an opposite role to the one that catapulted her to fame in Naked Killer.

kkl10 a (nl) wrote: Down to Earth (Casa de Lava, 1994) - 51994 film directed by portuguese filmmaker Pedro Costa. It didn't appear to be as polished as it could be, but it was a very interesting display of the minimalistic cinematic language Pedro Costa will refine in his later works. Although I didn't like this movie very much, I have to say it has its legitimate interest and I'll keep my eyes open for more stuff from this intriguing filmmaker.

Matt G (ag) wrote: Each day of my life I have spent NOT watching "UHF" has been a day wasted. If you like Weird Al at all, then you will like "UHF"...if you don't like Weird Al, then excuse me while I weep for your cold, black heart. A sensational celebration of silliness and being odd.

Cameron J (kr) wrote: "Phenomena, do-do do-do-do, phenomena, do-do-do-do, phenomena, do-do do-do-do do-do-do do-do-do do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do!" Even when written, twenty do's is too annoying to be funny in this case, even if this is an Italian film, like, "Sweden: Heaven and Hell", the film for which "Mah N Mah N" was made. That's right, folks, the song was, in fact, not originated for either "Sesame Street" or "The Muppets", and if it was, then perhaps the person who would be most annoyed by my forced reference would be Jennifer Connelly, because when all the other kids were off watching "Sesame Street" and "The Muppets", Connelly was starring in this messed up little Dario Argento film. Granted, Connelly was about 13 when this film was made, long after she floated in the demographic "Sesame Street" and "The Muppets Show" were directed toward, but hey, those shows weren't too much kiddier than the lame title we Americans came up with for this film's release in the States, "Creepers". Man, this film lost about 30+ minutes in its American cut, a year after "Once Upon a Time in America" was released in American cinemas with a runtime of almost two hours and a quarter, so the mid-'80s was the time for the US to neuter artistic Italian visions, or at least the ones with a young Jennifer Connelly. Granted, the Italian films in question were mostly in English, so apparently the Americans know something about marketability, but still, the point is that the Italians couldn't entirely catch a break in the '80s, which isn't to say that the losses of this film were likely as great as the ones ostensibly faced by "Once Upon a Time in America", because not even the realized cut of this film is all that. Yeah, this film is far from a "phenomena", but hey, it could be worse, and would have been if it wasn't for certain strengths. Italian progressive rock band Goblin was fairly popular with Italian filmmakers... and George A. Romero for a while during the '70s and '80s, and in the wake of the original line-up's break-up, bassist Fabio Pignatelli and keyboardist Claudio Simonetti joined forces with then-newcoming film score composer Simon Boswell to create a score for this film that is often monotonously overstylized in an overly '80s fashion, but generally reasonably colorful as a stylish tonal compliment, and when it comes to the unoriginal soundtrack, the '80s metal tunes are often cheesily forced, but also color things up. Perhaps just as complimentary of the tonal depth of this thriller as the soundtrack is Romano Albani's cinematography, which is held back by glaring technical shortcomings in filming that I will touch more upon later, but about as effective as it can be in its plays with sparse lighting that sell a sense of claustrophobia. On an artistic level, whether it be because of technical limitations or whatever, the film isn't too striking, but it is nevertheless stylish, and I can respect that, - even with the technical shortcomings - partially because the effective areas in style are often sold by what Dario Argento does reasonably well as storyteller. There's something very distant about Argento's storytelling, and that, coupled with other missteps in Argento's directorial performance, drives the final product into mediocrity, yet at the same time, when Argento does something sort of right, he plays an instrumental part in securing the film as borderline decent by establishing a fairly effectively brooding atmosphere, complimented by audacious, if questionably produced violence, as well as by the performances, or at least a particular performance. There are no real standouts in the supporting cast, some of whose members are just downright weak, but when it comes to the first lead performance by the lovely young Jennifer Connelly (Yes, I know that she was, like, 13 at the time, but we may as well give credit where it's due before those blasted eyebrows kick in), there is some pleasantly surprising impressiveness, as Connelly convinces enough in her portrayal of the somewhat eccentric lead - who fears for her life and mental stability - to almost carry the film. Sure, Connelly is not given enough material to truly save the mess of a final product, but she pulls off more than you might expect, even if you're a fan of the skill she would go on to flaunt as a very talented performer, and such talent joins style and directorial highlights in bringing the film to the brink of decency. Alas, in the long run, the final product falls short, having decent highlights, to be sure, but not enough to escape mediocrity, or at least call your attention away from the technical shortcomings. Now, this is an independent film of the '80s, so by no means are we dealing with all that high of a technical standard here, but there's hardly any excuse for this film to get as technically messy as it does, watering down many of the violent segments with questionable special effects, and watering down most every segment with grimy filming and uneven sound mixing, which aren't simply distancing, even by '80s standards, but kind of cheesy, like plenty of other elements in this film. As surely as commendable style is often undercut by technical shortcomings, the effectiveness of the film's soundtrack is, as I mentioned earlier, often betrayed by cheesily, or at least forcibly overstylized musicality, while cheesy elements in writing and mythology structuring undercut the effectiveness of substance, which, quite frankly, was always to be held back, even on paper. There's a certain intrigue to this film's story concept I suppose, as reflected by genuine highlights in engagement value, but on the whole, this thriller isn't all that conceptually thrilling, offering limited characterization, a well as a conflict presented so sparsely that you begin to forget about it as the plot meanders along, struggling to reach its point in a way that is hardly special, even when you disregard the genericism. On top of being limited in weight, this film's story is very, very, very formulaic, only, you know, with less parading of potentially tense conflicts, being heavy in tropes, to the point of thinning out an unpredictability that a mystery thriller of this nature should be driven by, yet isn't, seeing as how seeing where this plot is heading is hardly a challenge. The film isn't simply generic, it's trite, offering little that you haven't already seen before time and again, and such predictability, as well as the cheesiness, bland things up seriously, almost to the point of driving the final product into the mediocrity that is ultimately secured by the many things that Dario Argento does wrong, quite wrong. As I said earlier, there are some effective beats to Argento's handling of this "thriller" that give you enough glimpses into a better film for decency to almost be achieved, but on the whole, Argento's storytelling falls flat, being cold and aimless, with a hint of dullness, or at least consistency in some serious degree of blandness that makes the other problems in storytelling all but impossible to ignore. In terms of quantity, there's not a whole lot that's wrong with this film, but strengths are also limited, and weaknesses are glaring, or at least subtly piercing, watering down potential time and again until, before too long, the film sputters out as mediocre and never fully recovers, coming close to decency, but, rather unfortunately, not quite close enough to engage as much as it probably should. In conclusion, highlights in the effectiveness of the soundtrack, cinematography and direction, as well as an almost surprisingly engaging lead performance by the lovely Jennifer Connelly (Again, I know she was 13, but man, curse the eyebrows for coming in!), bring the final product to the brink of decency, ultimately betrayed by glaring technical issues that join writing issues in producing a cheesiness that calls your attention more toward the considerable narrative blandness that, when made all the more uncompelling by trite plotting and distant direction, nudge Dario Argento's "Phenomena", or, for us ignorant Americans, "Creepers" (Lame title for a lame movie) a forgettably mediocre misfire of an unthrilling thriller. 2.25/5 - Mediocre

David H (kr) wrote: I actually like this movie. Of course it helps that the original American Graffiti is in my top 5, but despite what the critics have unanimously said (ie: They hate it) this sequel stands as a classy little movie in its own right. It does lack the George Lucas touch, but the side by side story lines and the use of Woodstock style split screens is very effective. It is also one of the few 70's movies to show the Vietnam conflict from the average soldier's perspective.

Jack B (kr) wrote: You know the drill, this Fast & Furious spoof from the makers of Meet the Spartans and Epic Movie is exactly what you expect it to be. Lazy, tired and unfunny, Super Fast is super shit.

Martin T (au) wrote: More noir-ish than noir, a solid psychological drama but one that lacks tension. The shining star of this movie is Jose Ferrer, who pulls off devious and charming in a captivating manner reminiscent of Alan Rickman. Gene Tierney and Richard Conte just seem to be going through the motions by comparison. The film also deals with a lot of pop psychiatrics, including hypnosis... right behind amnesia in terms of hokey plot devices. The cinematography is dull and the score is perfunctory. A watchable story that needs a whole lot more spark to it.

Greg W (ag) wrote: one of the best ensemble pix from the eighties.