A Dangerous Man
After serving 6 years for a crime he didn't commit, Shane Daniels is released from jail with an apology from the State of Arizona. Within hours of his freedom, he unluckily bears witness to a cop killing by Chinese mafia who have a kidnapped girl and a bag of drug money
- Stars:Steven Seagal, Mike Dopud, Marlaina Mah, Vitaly Kravchenko, Jesse Hutch, Terry Chen, Byron Mann, Byron Lawson, Jerry Wasserman, Shawn C. Orr, Vincent Cheng, Dan Rizzuto, Fraser Aitcheson, Aidan Dee, Clay Virtue,
- Director:Keoni Waxman,
- Writer:Keoni Waxman
After serving 6 years for a crime he didn't commit, Shane Daniels is released from jail with an apology from the State of Arizona. Within hours of his freedom, he unluckily bears witness to... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
A Dangerous Man torrent reviews
(kr) wrote: These serial killer films are really hit or miss, most of them are misses, for a variety of reasons. They are usually cheaply made, direct-to-video films, with an inexperienced cast, trying to profiteer on the infamy of these evil men. That being said, I decided to watch Gacy anyway, because of all the insane people who became infamous, John Wayne Gacy, may have been the craziest. This married man with kids, ran a construction business, that only employed young boys, and on the weekends, he made extra money by dressing up as a clown for children's birthday parties. This man was seen as a wimpy, harmless, closeted guy, no one would have ever thought they'd find 27 bodies underneath his house. The producers of the film, Gacy, decided to take it in a different direction than similar films by introducing Gacy as this loveable loser. If you didn't know the story and just popped in the film for the hell of it, I'd have thought this was some kind of comedy....until it wasn't. Veteran character actor, Mark Holton, stars as Gacy and was terrific, he was honestly the only reason to watch the film, especially after it turned. The story is horrific and the rest of the cast amounts to little more than eye candy, but Holton really pulls everything together, takes you inside Gacy's tortured mind, and makes this movie more than just another slasher film. After watching Gacy, I did what everyone else would do and Wiki'ed John Wayne Gacy. I wasn't surprised to see that the film is considered to be wildly inaccurate. Obviously five people aren't going to live in a house with 27 rotting bodies underneath and be almost completely oblivious to it, so I knew the film probably had a lot of bull shit in it. The film does have a talented star that really makes this film much more interesting then the other serial killer bio-pics.
(de) wrote: best what the hell movie
(br) wrote: Still a lousy sequel, but it's a bit more watchable than the previous sequels. The characters, while terrible, are at least somewhat interesting. The kids aren't creepy in this one, and some scenes they don't even try. I didn't think Children of the Corn had potential for sequels, but I guess someone did.
(gb) wrote: Definitely Hilarious
(us) wrote: Saw this too long ago, and honestly, the memory of its awfulness is just too vivid for me to bear. IT was boring. Just bad all around. And I was surprised that Poitier was the director behind it. I really wish I could give you a professional review, but I do not care to revisit it, because life is way too short. It was corny, badly written, and the acting was mediocre.
(fr) wrote: Best Disney sequel when you compare it to crap like Tarzan 2, Lion King 1&1/2, or Lion King 2. This was probably one of the best sequels to one of the disney classics. Still not amazing, but better than the rest of the sequel trash.