#

A Pool Without Water

N/A

By mistake, he removes his mask and falls unconscious and wakes up in her room and start thinking about what the outcome will be of his foolishness. He does the same with other women as well, but returns to the waitress, at times living a token for her. He chloroforms her as she sleeps, and he has sex with her. He schemes chloroforming an attractive waitress. A married man with a boring job, wife talks too much, bratty children, live in cramped place, envisions a way to end this misery while keeping his family life

A Pool Without Water is the best new movie of Eiichi Uchida. The released year of this movie is 1982. You can check list actors in this movie torrents, such as Yûya Uchida, Mie, Reiko Nakamura, Yumiko Fujita, Fujio Akatsuka, Yoshio Harada, Megumi Saki, Kenji Sawada, Tamori, Fujio Tokita, Taiji Tonoyama, Rikiya Yasuoka. Movie' genres are Drama. Many people rated for this movie, Rate is 7.6 in www.imdb.com. We have a good movie torrents. Share this movies torrent to support us . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

A Pool Without Water torrents

A Pool Without Water full movie

A Pool Without Water 1982 torrent

A Pool Without Water torrent, A Pool Without Water movie torrents, download A Pool Without Water full movie, A Pool Without Water 1982 torrents, download A Pool Without Water 1982 torrents, watch A Pool Without Water movie, A Pool Without Water englishsub, free download A Pool Without Water movie, movie A Pool Without Water torrent

Links Name Quality Seeders Leechers Size
Download   Mizu no nai puuru aka A Pool Without Water Other 53 33 4 GB

Users reviews


Ashley H (nl)

I was not impressed with this motion picture. Joel Schumacher did a terrible job directing this movie. The script is badly written. Philip Seymour Hoffman and Robert De Niro give some what awful performances. It is about an ultraconservative police officer who suffers a debilitating stroke and is assigned to a rehabilitative program that includes singing lessons - with the drag queen next door. Flawless is a disappointing film


Brian H (ca)

A must see for vampire movie fans. I saw this when I was like 11 and loved it ever since. My Favorite Vampire Flick from the Eighties


Graham B (ca)

Shame. Great aging make-up and beautifully shot, but the story lacks pace or promise. It's ambitious premise doesn't quite pay off and the very likeable cast of characters are let down by a rather melancholic and lacklustre script. A tale of hippy radicals who establish a commune in rural France in 1968 and following on to their equally radical children 20 years later


Harry W (it)

So Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon has an interesting story to tell and gains momentum thanks to the fact that it has an effective interview with the subject itself for much of the film, but the limited extent that it actually gets involved in its material, the rushed pace and few people that it actually interviews gives it the credit of an MTV TV documentary short. So the simplicity in Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon does allow it to take an easygoing and casual look at the material which viewers do not have to desensitise themselves to appreciate. The fact that Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon is so neutral approaching its material may lack depth, but at the same time it gives a simple and clear perspective on the fact that gay culture is not as complicated as the modern media may lead it to be. I will certainly say though that Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon did give me a sensible piece of education on the way that gay culture has developed over time as well as the I learned that the commercialisation of the gay porn industry was one of the most notable expressions of gay culture during the free love time period of the 1970's and beyond. Frankly, Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon works more as a reconstruction of the events of Jack Wrangler's life more than anything because it spends so much time talking about that, but due to the fact that it fails to examine its more complex themes with substance or effective drama, the end result is a fast paced but hollow recreation of Jack Wrangler which really fails to go as deep as anatomy, regardless of what the title may suggest. He successfully gets a lot out of direct interviews with Jack Wrangler himself which gives us all a valid sense of his perspective on his own life story, but the fact is that Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon is in such a rush to tell its story that it forgets what it should honestly be doing and ends up feeling distant from its subject matter as if it were a TV movie funded by MTV. Though this film is clearly a very personal piece for him, Jeffrey Schwarz feels distant from the feature because he looks at everything in a rather theoretical manner. One factor for this is because Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon actually has very few people to interview and so the perspective of Jack Wrangler's life is very limited with the full scope of his described legacy not being felt by the way that Jeffrey Schwarz handles his life story. Though Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon is an effective depiction of the career of Jack Wrangler, it hardly feels like there is much of a sense of depth in it all. We get a sense of what happened, but we do not always get a sense of why. Because of that, it feels like a lot of the time that Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon does not take a second to catch its breath and ask why the interviewees feel the way they do about certain things. Since it only runs for a time period of 82 minutes and is seriously limited in the quantity of people it has interviewed to tell the full story, reserving most of it for the perspective of the titular man Jack Wrangler. Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon is in such a rush to tell the entire story and not mess around that it proceeds at an incredibly fast pace. Yet he is not given enough depth to truly justify a full 82 minutes surrounding him, especially when the filmmaking feels so mediocre. With Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon, the focus is solely on one person which is fair enough considering that it is his story. Inside Deep Throat could have had more depth, but it emphasized the way that it changed the porn industry and the life of the many people involved well enough. But we do not look into this too deeply. The industry is seen as more positive from the perspective of a male performer and we get an understanding of how Jack Wrangler actually made progress for the way gays were viewed in society. It is interesting to see it from the perspective of a different gender this time around. If you've seen Inside Deep Throat, you'd know that the pornographic industry is a seedy one which is rooted in disrespecting its stars for the sake of a profit, with Linda Lovelace's story compiling a history of physical and sexual abuse. Yet even though that is the message, it is not the easiest thing to feel due to the simplistic manner in which the documentary is constructed. The message in Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon is that a man in the porn industry changed the face of homosexual culture forever. We get a sense of how he changed the concept of masculinity in his heyday by playing the stereotypical cowboy archetype into his pornographic persona and how that led viewers to understand that the "limp-wristed" gay stereotype is little more than a stereotype. Jack Wrangler is a very interesting man, not so much for his pornographic career but because of how much he defied the conventions that stereotyped the gay community for so long during the more homophobic era of the late 20th century. As the story unfolds, we really get a sense of why. The first line of dialogue in Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon immediately establishes the answer that everyone wants to ask a porn star: why did you enter the industry? Jack Wrangler's answer is intriguing as it goes beyond the simplistic answer that it is an easy path to money, and that immediately sets the idea that the subject of the documentary is going to be an interesting one. With a curiosity about the gay side of the pornography industry, Wrangler: Anatomy of an Icon sounded like an interesting piece of history's underbelly


Holly F (ca)

It's beautiful and adventurous tinged with darkness. About time we had Jack and the Beanstalk live action movie! I enjoyed watching this, a definitely unique version of the tale


Jessica H (fr)

Funny at times, but mostly a good family film


Kyle M (nl)

B+)(Full review coming soon). Although thanks to how entertaining it is, it's a worthy sequel to watch. It resulted to have the same entertaining value with the cast and their characterization; but the comedy seen in the first two was little this time. But that was the point for the third's storyline: to see how well the experienced locals handles another attack with the absence of the duo. The return trip to the original setting from the first film is a nice reunion excluding Kevin Bacon and Fred Ward unfortunately


Laura B (it)

t I like it!. . Very weird


Matthew B (fr)

Don't wiki it and spoil yourself. Great ending. Clever and twisted


Matthew G (es)

ick & Nora Charles at there best!. My personal favorite of the series