A Very Private Affair (1962) torrents full movies


A Very Private Affair

When Jill becomes a movie star, she soon discovers that her private life is destroyed by persistent fans that won't leave her alone. Her mother's ex-lover, Fabio, tries to protect her.

A Very Private Affair is a movies torrent of Jean-Paul Rappeneau (screenplay), Louis Malle (screenplay), Jean Ferry (screenplay). The released year of this movie is 1962. You can check list actors in this movies torrent, for example Brigitte Bardot, Marcello Mastroianni, Nicolas Bataille, Dirk Sanders, Jacqueline Doyen, Paul Sorèze, Eléonore Hirt, Gloria France, Ursula Kubler, Isarco Ravaioli, Gregor von Rezzori, Antoine Roblot, Simonetta Simeoni. There are many categories, such as Drama. Many people rated for this movie, Rate is 5.6 in www.imdb.com. This is really a good movie torrents. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 103 minutes. Chich1Phat is interesting uploader, she is very fast. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Crazy', so what is your opinion. Do you know what are visitors? ChimTo is the best. I can't fight my Galaxy screen. Share with your friends and watch this movie together . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

Her mother's ex-lover, Fabio, tries to protect her. When Jill becomes a movie star, she soon discovers that her private life is destroyed by persistent fans that won't leave her alone

A Very Private Affair torrents

A Very Private Affair full movie

A Very Private Affair1962 torrent

A Very Private Affair torrent, A Very Private Affair movie torrents, download A Very Private Affair full movie, A Very Private Affair1962 torrents, download A Very Private Affair1962 torrents, watch A Very Private Affair movie, A Very Private Affair englishsub, free download A Very Private Affair movie, movie A Very Private Affair torrent

Download   Louis Malle - Vie Privee (1962)Other3439900.45 MB

You may also like

Users reviews

Alexander G (ru)

ecommended!. I'd never heard of Frank Langella but felt he brought a moving performance to the screen and emobodied Richard Nixon well. I saw this yesterday and found that it works thrillingly as drama (and also as a lesson in political history). Ron Howard directed, with outstanding support from his cast including Michael Sheen

Charles L (it)

IP Chris Penn!. This is the movie that Varsity Blues and every other teen coming of age football movie wants to be. Great story of how crazy high school football can really be

Craig S (br)

if his last name wasn't entertainer i don't think people would know they should laugh

Darrin C (br)

But old men can still be bad asses who don't give up on life. Another surprising great one from Sly! He realizes he's getting old and it's harder to compete with younger/stronger competitors

David F (au)

As a fan of Robert Bolt's 'A Man For All Seasons' I found it interesting to watch the story of Thomas More treated as a mere sub-plot here, though as with all historical dramas, great liberties are taken with recorded facts. The production is a little stiff, and has a very studio feel, but wonderful performances all around, including the great Anthony Quayle as Wosley. Richard Burton is in fine form as the lecherous, self-absorbed Henry VIII and Genevieve Bujold is a compelling (and beautiful) Anne Boleyn

Elgan D (au)

A film which does not explore deeply enough the characters nor the background of the story to make the picture truly involving

Hunter M (ca)

They did a great job turning Old Yeller into a film and getting good actors to play the parts. The ending of the book and movie are both tear jerking events, the movie more than the book because you are able to see the emotion in the family instead of just reading and imagining how everyone is feeling. Other than the death of Old Yeller the movie is an enjoyable experience just like reading the book even though a few things are missing. If you watch the movie with children who don't know about death then you'll should have that conversation or not watch the movie with them. I believe that the film was a very similar to the book, only missing a few details here and there. You'll miss whatever that thing is when it is no longer with you even if you didn't like it so much in the beginning. Don't take things for granted no matter how small they are. Old Yeller makes have to think about life and how it can end at any point, so you should enjoy it every day that you can. Since many of the main characters seem to survive anything they face. Along with not wanting or even expecting to see such an important character in the book/movie die. It's talked about so much because no one wanted Old Yeller to die, while being hinted at in the beginning of the book with the setup of having to shoot him. The ending is the most talked about part of the book and movie. While in the movie they waited until he showed effects of rabies then put him down. The family knew he would have rabies and decided to not wait and risk him hurting anyone. The movie and book come to a similar ending, with a noticeable difference Old Yeller is put down immediately after the fight with the wolf contracting rabies. It would had been a good addition to the movie, making people who haven't read the book on the edge of their seats to see what the result is while also getting a good laugh at the bull. Also bringing in comedy at the end of the pull fight with one of the bulls falling into a cart and rolling down the hill, having no idea what is going on. Things go wrong as the bulls head towards the house and the family creating a very dramatic feeling of what's going to happen. As bulls make their way to each other the family finds a place outside of the house to sit and relax while watching the bulls fight it out. The family hears the bulls in the distance making noises while Travis says what he thinks they could be saying to each other. The fight was focused on for a chapter in the book and i believe it should had been added in the movie. A scene that was left out of the movie was a bull fight that happened outside of the house. Old Yeller also looks clean for being a dog that just wanders around killing all kinds of animals in the wilderness. While in the movie Old yeller has a long tail and his ear doesn't look chewed. He was a big dog with slick hair, a snub tail or short tail, and a chewed ear. It's not a noticeable unless you read the book and remember the description of Old Yeller that was given. A noticeable difference i noticed was Old Yeller was different from what they described in the book. Which wasn't a problem with turning the book into a film while just looking a bit more modern than if it were 1957. The movie had to get everything correct from that time period, the way people talked and were treated which wasn't an easy take since the movie was released in 1957. The plot of the book and movie were set in the 1800s after the civil war. While there's an outbreak of rabies in the area Old Yeller protects the family from a rabid wolf and contracts rabies and needs to be put down. They find a dog and decide to keep him to help with things around the house and farm. The oldest boy Travis is left to take care of his mother and younger brother. Old Yeller is a story about a family in the 1800s whose father leaves to go on a cattle drive

Jared A (it)

It is the result of outrage and perverse actions and does nothing more than present you with the cold, vicious reality we must confront. Deliver doesn't preach, nor does it deliberately attempt to manipulate your emotions

Jeremiah L (it)

Nice cinematography to boot. I'm not sure why dying disfigured fish were chosen to narrate, but I like it

Jesse O (it)

Good idea, terrible execution. I really don't recommend watching this movie in one sitting because you will die of boredom, at least I almost did. So that makes it hard to justify, in my mind, the length of the film. The movie has its funny lines and everything, but you could miss about 80% of this film and you'd still get the gist of the story from the other 20%. I will admit that the film get better as it reached its climax, but by that point it's really too late. The story is aimless and rarely goes anywhere, so you add that on top of the terrible acting from the main actress and the awful pacing, I'm probably being very considerate in giving it 2 stars. Her delivery is terrible and she completely drags this movie down. I did like that this girl had a cold and detached demeanor about her, but that's about it. And that's unfortunate, because I think the character could've been good with a better actress. Never at any point do you see this girl as anything but a bitch. She simply doesn't have the skills to play, what should've been, a complex character. Her delivery is awful. Not to mention the girl that played her, her performances leaves a lot to be desired. The problem is that Cayetana is really, as a character, completely unlikable and, realistically, kind of a bitch. There's also these dream sequences with people from Peru's history that could be considered heroes and how Cayetana wishes to be a hero like them and how they way their lives turned out end up affecting her and how she reacts to her new baby brother. They don't make a big deal out of it, as it's supposed to be metaphorical, but this might've been the best part of the film itself, how they incorporate these attacks into the stories without it feeling forced. The most interesting stuff in the movie is the stuff that's implicit, like the terrorist attacks by a communist group. The problem is the execution itself leaves a lot to be desired. I would say that as far as story progression, the film is fine. I simply don't think there was enough interesting material to justify the film being as long as it is. If there was a major problem with the film was the story. The second hour of the film is easier to get through, but I imagine that it was mostly because I, again, watched the film in two different nights. The pacing makes the first hour seem more like three. Getting through the first hour requires massive levels of concentration. If I hadn't watched this film in two separate nights, I think I would've given this film a much lower rating. Another issue is the pacing of the film. And I KNOW I didn't miss anything because I did finish it. I had to watch the movie in two separate days and, to be honest, if I hadn't finished watching it at all, it would not have bothered me because I don't think I would've missed much. No, this movie is completely and utterly a chore to watch. although you could make the argument. . . No, not bad. This movie did absolutely nothing for me, because it's the worst thing a movie can be. The movie tells the story of this girl, with a very overactive imagination, who believes that when her baby brother is born