Accident on Hill Road

Accident on Hill Road

In order not to jeopardize her overseas career, an impaired woman, who had just run over a male, decides to conceal her crime with the victim trapped in the windshield.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:105 minutes
  • Release:2010
  • Language:Hindi,Bhojpuri,English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:nurse,   drug use,   loss of wife,  

In order not to jeopardize her overseas career, an impaired woman, who had just run over a male, decides to conceal her crime with the victim trapped in the windshield. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


You may also like

Accident on Hill Road torrent reviews

Gillian H (ru) wrote: This movie was alright, but sort of confusing to me. He is a struggling actor, but he gets invited to Michael Cera's party with famous people like Aubrey Plaza and Alia Shawkat... What?? The kid was cute and it showed me how annoying children can be, and we still love them. I guess that is what made this movie 3 stars instead of one. Also............... RIP goldfish. I get why he did that but that was really sad to me

Hank M (ag) wrote: every town should have a bog.

Whitney W (jp) wrote: If I can say nothing else it's that this film is beautiful to watch, even in its most uncomfortable moments. Wonderfully captures that all too hard to describe limbo of growing up. The aesthetics and score of this are fantastic and I couldn't help but remember and miss this phase in my life - even the confusing and sometimes terrible moments that come with it. It's difficult to capture a mood or a life stage well, particularly at this age and Sciamma does it wonderfully. I'm now nostalgic for a time I usually try to forget. Great performance by Pauline Acquart as well - wish she was in other films.

Jane S (mx) wrote: Meaningful. I like it and not only because some of it was shot at climbing mecca, Mt Arapiles.

Jack S (es) wrote: Growing up I was more a Pokemon fan, but I still managed to catch this flick. Nonsensical cartoon violence. And a great soundtrack.

Vincent D (it) wrote: Original idea that should have remained just that.

Mike N (fr) wrote: well filmed and great performances with a story I found to be less clever than I think it set out to be but some of it was really poignant,interesting,and entertaining.

Tuco (ru) wrote: Peasant families endure many hardships and social injustices in an almost 3 hour film that held my attention from beginning to end.

John W (it) wrote: This is an interesting film to talk about for a number of reasons. Part of it is quite honestly, because after viewing it I was not sure whether or not I had seen something good or bad. This film came in the wake of several other historical epics. Kick-started by the success of "GLADIATOR", itself paved the way for by "BRAVEHEART", and released amidst other such films. Particularly within that year alone Wolfgang Petersen's "TROY", Antoine Fuqua's "KING ARTHUR", and Ridley Scott's "KINGDOM OF HEAVEN". And regardless of whatever one may think of it's overall quality, it should be noted that the film is probably the most historically accurate of them for what it's worth. Which from a certain perspective can be seen as both its greatest strength and it's greatest weakness. In all the ground the film tries to cover concerning his life it could be said that the films reach exceeds its grasp. Seeking to cover his early childhood, to his schooling, to his ascension to the throne, to his conquests, to the political strife among his ranks, to all f his romantic relationship, and into his death. However I do think there are some truly great scenes here. Such as Alexander's rousing speech to his men before the Battle of Guagamela and Philip's talk to his son about the Gods and Titans. This especially came to be a problem for those who came into it for the action, as there are really only two battle sequences. One towards the beginning, and the other towards the end. Given all the other story it had to cover, it's not hard to understand why but can be seen as disappointing to some.In recent years the swords and sandals epic is all but dead again as it were before the all to brief early 2000's revival. This film's failure playing a big part in that. But we have been hearing of similar project. Already begun is an intended trilogy of films about Genghis Khan directed by Sergei Bodrov and Vin Diesel keeps talking up an intended and from the sounds of it quite ambitious trilogy about Hannial the Conqueror he's hoping to make. Both of which are rather unprecedented in this genre. Whilst film series' are very commonplace with Hollywood it's never been done in the Historical Epic/Swords-and-sandals genre. The one exception I can think of being 1954's "DEMETRIUS AND THE GLADIATORS", the sequel to "THE ROBE". Though several attempts to figure out a sequel to "GLADIATOR" it never happened, and if you choose to count it the book sequel to "DANCES WITH WOLVES" entitled "THE HOLY ROAD" has been discussed, but that's about it as far as I'm aware of. And it all really depends on how big the story is. The two most popular of the modern historical epics, "BRAVEHEART" and "GLADIATOR", are structured in such a way that they feel like they each fit perfectly in one film.

Lenny R (fr) wrote: More plot than the others to get in the way of the action, and things are perhaps a little too civilised, but what action there is is outstanding, it's full of colourful characters and awesome vehicles, and Hugh Keays-Byrne's Toecutter is one of my favourite ever movie villains. It's almost as though this one tells all the necessary story, allowing the sequels to exist as the extended action sequences they are. This is where Max gets mad.

Perrine B (ca) wrote: Karen approche la cinquantaine et regrette encore le jour o elle a d abandonner sa fille alors qu'elle a accouch 14 ans. Elizabeth a 37 ans, est extrmement indpendante, carririste, et dtermine vivre sa vie selon ses propres envies. Lucy ne peut pas avoir d'enfant et se bat pour obtenir la garde d'un bb qu'une ado met l'adoption. Sans le savoir, les destins de ces 3 femmes sont lis et vont se croiser.Troublant. Trois portraits de femmes trs diffrentes et pleine de caractre. Karen (Annette Bening, remarquable) est remplie d'amertume et de regrets, incapable de se laisser aimer les autres tellement elle se culpabilise. Elizabeth (Naomi Watts, insaisissable) est une femme comme on en voit peu. Adopte sa naissance, elle a grandi dans un univers qui ne nous est pas renseign (un peu dommage) et qui l'a blinde face aux motions. Il en rsulte un personnage complexe et quelque peu choquant. Lucy (Kerry Washington, authentique) donne tout ce qu'elle peut pour enfin avoir un enfant avec son compagnon. Malgr les nombreux obstacles qui se dresseront devant elle, elle ne perd ni espoir, ni sa volont.Si certaines situations sont droutantes, elles n'en sont pas pour autant mauvaises, et il est impossible de rester impassible devant ces histoires. Un drame fort et admirablement interprt.

intuciic (fr) wrote: extremely stupid movie