2012. The dawn of destruction. As giant alien machines enslave and feed off humanity, the few remaining survivors band together to form a armed militia that will be the last stand against total extinction. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
2012. The dawn of destruction. As giant alien machines enslave and feed off humanity, the few remaining survivors band together to form a armed militia that will be the last stand against total extinction (IMDB.com).
You may also like
Alien Dawn torrent reviews
steven h (ca) wrote: ive been wanting to see this film 4 ages
Vilia C (au) wrote: Remember the very old Jap drama - Oshin? This reminded me of that, except she's not that physically challenged. A nice subtle depiction of a mother/wife's struggle in the absence of her husband during the hard times.
Jocelyn B (au) wrote: I have to say... I really think the critics were completely unfair to Urban Legends: Final Cut, the 2000 sequel to Urban Legend. I can easily imagine them seeing a sequel to a mediocre slasher, with such a corny subtitle, and not giving it a chance at all.I actually liked it a lot. It's definitely better than I Still Remember What You Did Last Summer, and I liked it better than the first Urban Legend, too. I'd even say it's better than Scream 3.The Scream movies get love for all the pop culture references and commentary, dialogue about the "rules" of horror films, extended sequences of Carpenter's Halloween being watched by characters, etc, and I Know What You Did Last Summer also plays to the urban legend thing.But Urban Legends: Final Cut both directly addresses and also applies the elements that make great films. I don't hear people talking about mise-en-scene in a Wes Craven movie. I really loved the framing and the camera work in UL: Final Cut. It has great lighting and mood. And I love Jennifer Morrison, so that helps too. It also had a few kills that were more clever, I thought, than anything in the Scream or Last Summer franchises.I have a strong suspicion that the subtitle was NOT the choice of the director. It just doesn't fit with the impression I get from the filmwork, and I can easily believe a dumb shit studio executive slapped it on there because they thought it was "edgy". You should give this one a chance!
Tory L (fr) wrote: Funny, a weekend movie. 4 stars.
Greg H (kr) wrote: This movie did to 80s teen movies what the Altamont concert ( where a guy was killed by the Hell's Angels Bikers/ Security Team)did to large outdoor gatherings of hippies. Directed by those wacky pants Zucker Brothers' collaborator Jim Abrahams (Airplane ) this steaming pile of poo came out between their first 2 Naked Gun movies and tries to show.directorial range.that isn't there. The imminent return of the town's eppnymous girl done good sparks a fervor that includes an official Roxy Carmichael week blah blah blah you can pretty much guess the rest. If you want to see the 80s brand of introspective yet entertaining and charming brand of teen comedy movie die a horrible death to the tune of a Melissa Ethridge soundtrack, This is the one for you . Im sure Winona Ryder would like to wipe thos clunker off her bio but as pointed out by hercharacter Dinky, it's good to want things.
Jason N (ag) wrote: My favorite Willie Western, with Red Headed Stranger a close second!
Eric H (mx) wrote: "To Be Or Not To Be" was one of the greatest films made during World War II. Jack Benny and Carole Lombard were perfectly cast, however my vote goes to the greatest scene stealer of them all, Sig Rumann, in the role of "Zo They call me Concentration Camp Erhardt?"
Kyle L (au) wrote: Let Me In is an amazing adaptation of John Ajvide Lindqvist's novel Let The Right One In and in many ways it not only acts as an outstanding and well achieved adaptation but it also stands on its own for all the right reasons. If you read the novel and watched the original 2008 Swedish adaptation then you know the basic storyline of this film, but if you haven't read the novel or watched the original Swedish adaptation then I'll tell you the plot of this film. Let Me In is the story of a young 12 year old boy who lives in a life where he gets bullied all the time and is having a troubled time living in a divorced life with his mother. But all that is about to change when he meets 12 year old Abby who lives next door to him. But soon strange murders are starting to happen in town as soon as Abby and her father/guardian moves in and the murders seem to be connected to Abby and her father/guardian. Owen soon learns the true nature of his girlfriend that she is in fact a vampire. But Owen's friendship and love for her is stronger than his own fear and Owen must make a choice either to stay away from Abby or to be with her forever so that they can no longer be separated. I love this movie as much as I love reading the novel and watching the original Swedish adaptation. When I read the book I was so amazed and stunned with it and when I saw the original Swedish adaptation I was so stunned and it is the movie where I found a special place in my own mind and life. When I finally watched the 2010 adaptation I was more surprised than I expected because I was surprised that this film is just as good as the original 2008 Swedish adaptation. When I saw this film I noticed a series of significant changes between both movies. This film has a lot of changes to the original Swedish adaptation and the novel itself and the changes are done properly and in a good way. You can truly see in the film that there are lots of frequent changes between the original 2008 Swedish film in terms of style and execution including the setting itself along with the names of the two leads. What I understand is that this movie tries to stay true to itself and to the source of the novel as well and both films may have the same themes but it has a constantly different tone from start to finish. The other thing that's different in this film is that this movie has a few characters that are not in this film and have been replaced by new characters but there's also a few characters who were mentioned in the film than in the Swedish movie who are in the novel itself and the characters' backstory completely changed from the book to this movie since the Swedish film stays true to the source of the novel this version changed the whole thing. At one point I know some people call this a remake of the Swedish adaptation but for me its not really a remake and more of a new adaptation of the novel by John Ajvide Lindqvist, just remember that this film is more like David Fincher's adaptation of The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. Although like the new adaptation of The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo(which was released by the way in 2011) Let Me In is a remake a bit since there are a few scenes that were completely changed from the Swedish adaptation and the novel but it is more of a new adaptation since there are no significant changes in this movie from the book other than the setting and the names of the characters including the backstories of the characters are changed and anglicized at the same time. One of the things I like about this new adaptation of Let The Right One In is that while this movie tries to stay true to the source of the novel the overall execution and tone is different since the Swedish adaptation relies heavily on Drama and focus on the characters and suspense along with the beauty of the film's major settings the 2010 adaptation is more or less the same as the novel and the 2008 Swedish movie but like I said with of course a completely different execution from start to finish. If the Swedish adaptation is a beautiful Horror film that is very dramatic this adaptation is more of a dark violent love story with the tones and themes being significantly darker and more serious and it is an example of how a vampire film should be done in a proper way(and I'm mentioning you Twilight Saga since the Twilight films are dull, boring films that tries way too hard to be a good vampire film but ends up failing in the worse possible way) and this movie did that. I love how the film's setting was changed from Blackberg in Sweden to a town in New Mexico and although the New Mexico setting is almost as gloomy and beautiful as the Blackberg setting in the Swedish film I still think the Blackberg setting in the 2008 adaptation is still the best in my honest opinion. The other things I like about this film is how this movie works and stands on its own. I understand and appreciate how director Matt Reeves approach this film. First of all he's trying to make sure its true to the source of the novel. Second, he tries to make sure it is not a shot for shot remake like the awful Psycho film but more of a new adaptation of the novel and he pays tribute as well to the 2008 Swedish film and last but not least he tries to make it his own film rather than copying Tomas Alfredson's style in the Swedish film and what he does do is that he respects the concept and execution and not try to insult it and believe me I wouldn't like this movie if it was more of a shot for shot remake but it instead ends up being a successful adaptation with a series of significant changes for good reason rather than a dull and boring remake. Since the Swedish film captures the beauty of the film's setting and is very suspenceful and dark. This adaptation is darker and is packed with tons of special effects since the Swedish film didn't have much blood but is very intense this film is packed with loads of gore, blood and scary special effects. I seriously enjoyed also the changes in the film like I said in the first part of this review. I love how the names were changed from Oskar and Eli to Owen and Abby. It was also a smart idea to change Eli/Abby's backstory since in the novel and the Swedish film Eli is described as a male vampire in a woman's body in this film Abby is a young twelve year old girl who was bitten by a psychotic vampire which caused her to become a vampire as well. I also like how the relationship of Owen's parents in this film is different to the novel and the Swedish film. In the novel and the Swedish film Oskar has a good relationship with his mother who is caring, loving and very kind but has a problematic and strained relationship with his dad. In this version Owen has a troubled relationship with his mom but has a caring dad who is divorced from Owen's alcoholic and often neglectful mother and both characters' faces are barely shown in the film and I like how other characters in the book are in the film but has no speaking lines and is not a major focus in the film with them having a total of five minutes screen time in the film. One of the other things I like about this movie is that this film is packed with tons of scenes that are intense, scary, creepy and very gruesome and violent plus similar to the Swedish film(The opening scene, the victims of Abby hanging upside down, the intense car jack sequence, the suspenceful tunnel scene where Abby kills a local jogger instead of a drunk man name Jocke in the original Swedish movie, Virginia's more disturbing and gruesome attack, the death of the detective, the scene where all the kids found the dead jogger in the ice, Abby's guardian getting burned with a bottle of acid, Owen splitting Kenny's ear with a metal pole, Abby bleeding infront of Owen after he doesn't give her an invitation to come into the house and the suspenceful pool finale combined with lots of brutal and gory special effects until the outstanding ending with Owen leaving town with Abby in the briefcase) plus I love the gore and violence in this movie when I said that this film is more of a dark violent love story and there are loads of gory and bloody scenes that are full of extreme close ups(Kenny's nasty ear split after Owen hits his ear with a metal pole, the close up of the jogger's neck after getting attacked by Abby with the blood eaten by Abby as well, the gruesome scene before Virgina gets burned by the sunlight where she is chewing on her own arm and the brutal and super gory killing in the swimming pool finale combined with a dark atmosphere) and I also love how this movie has a high body count than in the Swedish novel. I also find the bullies in this film being more aggressive than in the Swedish adaptation and they are almost close to the novel as well. I kind of find it nice for a change that this film also used some decent looking CGI which is not perfect but done at least in a good way without ruining the quality of the film. But the best part of this movie is the chemistry between the two lead characters and both Owen and Abby have a similar yet amazing chemistry that is just as good as Oskar and Eli's chemistry in the Swedish film and I love how there's a bit of intensity and tension of the two characters in this film than in the Swedish film in just one particular scene that's the one where Owen enters Abby's home. Also the soundtrack by Michael Giacchino(Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes, Jurassic World) is so mesmerizing and outlandishly beautiful and stunning plus haunting as well and it really fits well in the tone of the film. The thing that surprised me the most about this movie is that this film was produced by Hammer films. I didn't know at one point that Hammer films the company behind the Dracula films with Christopher Lee and the Mummy and Frankenstein movies back in the 70's and 80's are involved with this movie and they seriously did an amazing and outstanding job in making this new adaptation of Let The Right One In by John Ajvide Lindqvist and this is by far their best film since the smart and eerie Wake Wood along with The Woman In Black and they seem to be doing quite well in their movies so far. Now the acting is just as good as in the Swedish adaptation. Matt Reeves seriously knows how to choose the right casts for his movies. I love Chloe Grace Moretz as the vampire Abby who becomes Owen's girlfriend and she was so gorgeous yet very cute in this movie and she seriously delivered a strong performance just like Lina Leandersson in the Swedish film. Kodi Smit-McPhee did an amazing job with his performance as Owen the bullied twelve year old boy who later on becomes Abby's boyfriend. I also love Richard Jenkins role as Abby's guardian Thomas while the rest of the casts like Goosebumps actor Dylan Minnette did an amazing job with his performance as the main antagonist and bully Kenny. Director and Writer Matt Reeves did an impressive and outstanding job with his work on this film and he seriously did a good job creating a new adaptation of John Ajvide Lindqvist's novel Let The Right One In and he really respects the concept of the novel and the film. I also understand that he tries to keep it steady in becoming a good film by not ruining the overall concept of the film and just having a few significant changes and he seriously made this movie in a proper and good way and he even made it entertaining not only for those who watched the Swedish film and read the novel but also for a wider audience and for people who never watched the Swedish adaptation or for those who never read the book by Mister Lindqvist. Overall Let Me In is a superb and amazing adaptation of John Ajvide Lindqvist's novel of the same name and since the Swedish adaptation is a beautiful Vampire Horror film Let Me In is of course as I mentioned a dark violent love story that captures the spirit of the novel itself and is also a film that stands on its own two feet. This movie gets a 10.4/10
Nolan S (us) wrote: This movie is like that friend that we all have who answers a really simple question by telling you a ridiculous backstory that takes about an hour and a half to get through. Luckily the ridiculous backstory that was told in The Grand Budapest Hotel was entertaining as hell! I have never seen a movie like this in my life. This film was a thriller, comedy, drama, mystery, and romance all packed into 100 minutes. I loved nearly every second of this film, and I would highly recommend it!
Shyann B (nl) wrote: Loved this movie! Hilarioussss