Almost You (1985) torrents full movies


Almost You

Alex and Erica Boyer's marriage is in a crisis: job and wife bore Alex. When Erica has an accident that has her staying in a wheel chair for some time, it changes their life: Alex meets ...

Almost You is a great movie of Adam Brooks (story), Mark Horowitz. This movie was introduced in 1985. We can counted many actors in this movie torrents, for example Brooke Adams, Griffin Dunne, Karen Young, Marty Watt, Christine Estabrook, Josh Mostel, Laura Dean, Dana Delany, Miguel Pinero, Joe Silver, Joe Leon, Daryl Edwards, Spalding Gray, Suzzy Roche, Stephen Strimpell. Movie' genres are Drama. This movie was rated by 4.9 in This is really a good movies torrent. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 96 minutes. Itachi8x is good uploader, she is very proactive. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Excited', so what is your thought. Do you know what are customers? ChimTo is the best. I can't fight my Galaxy screen. Please support us via sharing this movies to your friends . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

. . When Erica has an accident that has her staying in a wheel chair for some time, it changes their life: Alex meets . Alex and Erica Boyer's marriage is in a crisis: job and wife bore Alex

Almost You torrents

Almost You full movie

Almost You1985 torrent

Almost You torrent, Almost You movie torrents, download Almost You full movie, Almost You1985 torrents, download Almost You1985 torrents, watch Almost You movie, Almost You englishsub, free download Almost You movie, movie Almost You torrent

Download   Almost.You.1985.DVDRip.XviD-AENDVDRip4146707.36 MB

You may also like

Users reviews

Adriano B (ru)

Ingenous, outlandish, but silly: in one word, Zu-Landerish. A bit perplexing high-fantasy wuxia which to western tastes falls irredeemably in the magic realm of kitsch

Alan G (gb)

While Rollins' performance was excellent, it would be a lie to say that no one else could play the role just as well as him, or even better, although it doesn't negate Rollins' work. You can feel what Jack feels, and it adds unexpected depth to the character. All of a sudden, you're rooting for him, with every blow he lands, you feel like you threw the punch. While this seems like nothing at first, just simple exposition, it works out later, as when the trouble starts, you feel like you know Jack. Rather than diving straight into chaos, or insulting the viewer with a cheesy setup, "He Never Died" gives us an idea of the main character, Jack's daily routine

Alex r (au)

The only difference is, is that there are better films out tackling the same subject. Overall this is a soulless movie, and one we've seen many times before. I don't think that the filmmakers cared to really make a good film with this one. Annapolis is a collection of bad actors and a poor story that ends up being a pointless effort. This film just copies every feel good film, and waters down the formula and plays out every clich in the book. Watch something else; you'll be glad you did. This is one of those films that should have been reworked on before getting green lit. Annapolis is a forgettable film that scraps the bottom of the barrel. If you're looking for an entertaining film with this one, you'll sadly be disappointed. This is a prime example of what happens when a film has too many clichs going for it, the end result suffers greatly, and it ends up falling flat. I hated the film, and felt it was a pointless film. The dialogue and performances are laughable, and this is simply put, a film that isn't worth your time. This is a bland affair, one that is just boring, with nothing that's ever interesting that occurs on-screen. James Franco has done far better work than this, but Annapolis is one of his worst films. The characters are generic, and the story is something that we've seen many times before. This is the type of film that relies on a poorly thought script, one that simply doesn't work. Annapolis is an awful, clichd mess of a film that fails to entertain

Carlos M (ca)

The meandering quality of the film's plot (which may put most viewers off) is in fact what I like the most about it, while the solid performances, nice cinematography and Gia Coppola's firm direction help make this a solid debut for her as a filmmaker

Chris B (kr)

or Child!!! Not A Child So Live With That =(. OMG!!! I Saw That In Theater And It's So Amazing

Daniel J (nl)

Not my favorite but not a bad fim, vengeance and betrayal

John W (ca)

This is the type of story your mind keeps coming back to again and again to puzzle over details. It does move at a slower pace and requires a good bit of thought and participation on the part of the audience to make it a worthwhile watch, but it is. Well acted, stunningly filmed and superbly directed. Unlike so many films, Blood River doesn't walk you through the plot or beat you with it's meaning. I think. . . I liked it. Part horror, part psychological thriller and completely disturbing

Keith E (kr)

one of my favorite movies

Mike I (de)

Apparently he likes blaming himself for everything, so I'm sure he can shoulder the weight of that as well. If not, just blame the main character. In any event, this movie will find a special place in your heart. Maybe it's to see if it ever gets better, maybe it's just to see how bad it can get or maybe it's just because you feel sorry for everyone involved. And in a train wreck kind of way, you want to keep watching. It's all so bad, it becomes funny. But all of this combined makes this worth watching. The plot, as executed, makes no sense. The plot, at it's simplest level and on paper, is worthwhile. When the zombies attack, they usually just stand there, allowing themselves to be bitten. The characters are borderline retarded. At times it's daylight despite it being night seconds earlier. The pacing of the movie staggers around more than a wino after downing a bottle of Mad Dog 20/20. Sound effects are even worse. The sound is bad, not even syncing up at times. I'm guessing one of those old-school, big, heavy-ass suckers that you can't even find at a pawn shop anymore. It appears to have been shot using a video camera. Lines are delivered with no inflection and, in some cases, apparently forgotten. The acting is atrocious. 5 stars? Because the sheer amount of SUCK that this movie has oozing out of it makes it diametrically more appealing. So why 2. I've said that before - check other reviews, I'm sure there's been a handful of "worst movies" - but this one truly is. I mean EVER ever. This actually may be, in fact, the worst movie I have ever seen. Do not let the two and a half stars fool you - this is not even remotely a good movie

Stuart M (gb)

And the level of casual racism and abuse with no sort of self-awareness is a little disturbing from this distance in time. There doesn't seem to be anything special about it and the much vaunted "chemistry" between the two leads seems more like loathing until it suddenly and inexplicably turns to respect. I'm not sure why this film was so popular