Amaravathi (1993) torrents full movies

Amaravathi is a excited movies torrent of N/A. The released year of this movie is 1993. We can counted many actors in this movie torrents, for example Ajith Kumar, Sanghavi, Nasser. The kind of movie are Romance. The rating is 6.9 in www.imdb.com. We have a good movies torrent. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 127 minutes. MongDu is good uploader, she is very fast. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Crazy', so what is your thought. Do you know what are users? ShinichiKuto is the best. I can't fight my iPhone screen. Share this movies torrent to support us . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

Amaravathi torrents

Amaravathi full movie

Amaravathi1993 torrent

Amaravathi torrent, Amaravathi movie torrents, download Amaravathi full movie, Amaravathi1993 torrents, download Amaravathi1993 torrents, watch Amaravathi movie, Amaravathi englishsub, free download Amaravathi movie, movie Amaravathi torrent

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Amaravathi (2009) @Other2936398.96 MB

You may also like


Users reviews


alex r (us)

it's monty python say no more


Anna B (es)

Also the rental company I got this from said it was two hours long, so the abrupt ending came as quite a shock. Fingersmith had pretty much the same problems. I enjoy Sarah Waters's stuff, it's just that the adaptations are so ugly. The direction is so terrible though; artless, clunky, sub-TV quality, frequently unintentionally funny, and it telegraphed the betrayal a mile off, so the protagonist just seemed like an idiot. Madeley is really good, and the writing isn't bad


Ben L (fr)

I think it lacks a little something to fully engage my personal interest (possibly because I'm not a big fan of rock-and-roll) but that doesn't mean it isn't well-made and entertaining throughout. I can easily see why this film is greatly admired by so many people. The biggest highlights were Frances McDormand and Philip Seymour Hoffman who served as different kinds of advisers/protectors to William. I thought the cast was easily the highlight of the film, because they all fit perfectly, and sold the story. Yet his character qualities of extreme loyalty and trustworthiness make him a standout anyways. It doesn't feel like there is any basis for his affection for these guys as they continue to distrust and mistreat him. I think where I have difficulty connecting the dots in movies like this is when they make it clear that William is forming an emotional attachment to the band. I have heard that this is loosely based on some real events that Cameron Crowe went through himself, which makes sense because everything feels so genuine, and you can also sense the passion he has for the music that is sprinkled throughout the film. Kate Hudson is also charming as the girl who swears she's not a groupie, that grows too attached to one guy. He is our surrogate in the story, and I like how it eases us into this world of sex, drugs, and rock-and-roll. I really love the background we see on the character of William, and how he gets hooked in with Stillwater. This movie is a strange mixed bag of heart-warming drama, comedy masterpiece, and frustrating look behind the scenes of life with a rock-and-roll band


Dave J (ru)

2 out of 4 stars. This movie is boring and doesn't add up to nothing. Obviously, inspired by one of Mike Leigh's improvised movies perhaps "Naked" as well as "semi-documentaries such as "Kids" and "Bully". Now, while I appreciate the 'raw' looking environment background, it's unable to make it's characters engaging, since each one of them are just as self-absorbed and one-note as the next, as we continue to see them doing things we ourselves can't see ourselves doing. . . I mean, like whoopee. But ironically, the only person who does care about her is the young teenage guy she used to babysit with. Friday, February 14, 2014 (2012) Picture Day DRAMA Written and directed by Kate Miles Melville making yet another pointless coming-of-age story centering onto yet another misunderstood teenage girl in this case it's Claire (Tatiana Maslany) who does nothing except sleep around, drink booze with people who don't really care about her, particularly the struggling rock musician


Jason P (us)

definitely not as good as the book but made for a good show


Jesse O (ru)

I can imagine that it'd be much better in its original form. If I can ever find a copy then I'll definitely come back here and do this review again. I can imagine that I'd give this film a higher rating if I had seen the original cut. The film, while completely different from the original film, still is fairly watchable even to this day. Wurdulak is essentially another word for vampire, but these ones only consume the blood of those they love. Her family haunts her and they then turn her into a Wurdulak. Some funny moments in Sdenka leaving her entire family behind to be consumed by the Wurdulak to escape with a man she just met the day prior. The Wurdulaks was also a pretty good segment. Unacceptable. It's changed entirely. While A Drop of Water was my least favorite short of the film, The Telephone actually has it worst. The American version turns this segment into a nonsensical ghost story. The original short had a lesbian subplot, Rosy was a prostitute, and Frank was actually her pimp. mostly from The Telephone. . . The problem with this, as I mentioned, is the fact that several subplots are removed. With that said, I thought that the film ended up at its high note, with the Wurdulak short. That's part of the reason the film gets the rating it did, because I wouldn't ever sacrifice want the quality of the film and that's what this cut did. Maybe one day. As much as I thought the first short, Drop of Water was actually the 'worst' one, I'd still want to see the film how it was meant to be seen by Mario Bava. I can understand why they did it, but if the original cut is available then why not go with that instead. So to see such an influential filmmaker's cut being done away with because of American conservatism at the time is just really disappointing. Not to say Bava was the only Italian doing these types of films, Dario Argento, for one, has probably achieved more fame than Bava himself, but Bava is pretty instrumental in the whole genre existing in its current form. This genre really came into prominence in the late 70s and early 80s with movies like Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th. If you've followed Mario Bava's trajectory, and this is my first review of one of his films on here, but I obviously know about the man, then you know he's one of the grandfather of what is known today as the slasher genre. Apparently the Italian cut of the film more violent than it was in the American version and that really disappoints me. Entire subplots were removed, the order of the shorts, the musical score, and the film is shorter. The American version is pretty much nerfed from everything that I've read. And another problem is the fact that the print that Netflix has available is the American version of the film and not Mario Bava's original cut it. But, and this isn't meant as an insult to this film, this hasn't aged as well as it could've. There's many examples of this throughout the history of film. As is Taxi Driver, the first two Godfather films. 2001: A Space Odyssey is still an incredible film. With that said, I think some films definitely stand the test of time better than others. we are all a product of our times and you can't expect someone to view a film as old as this with the same sensibilities as they had in the 60s in 2014. . . It's impossible. Try as one may might, you cannot view a movie over 50 years old with the same eyes as they were viewed when first released. This review talks about the American version of the film


Michael A (de)

niece grew up watching it I learned to love it


stefn birgir s (ca)

Not as funny as expected