Autoportret z kochanka

Autoportret z kochanka

N/A

. You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Autoportret z kochanka torrent reviews

Aneeroodh S (us) wrote: If only the rest of the movie were as good as the final twist/reveal. A rather disappointing for a Aamir starer.

Andres V (es) wrote: Superficial documental sobre la importancia del disenio en nuestro diario vivir con la participacion de varios diseniadores de talla mundial. Opiniones un poco vagas y gran falta de concepto agrietan este documental que prometia por el enorme tema que intentaba tratar. Como para ver en tele mientras se cambian canales en busca de algo mejor.

Sergey B (it) wrote: A manly film directed and played by the greatest grandpas in Hollywood - Clint Eastwood and Morgan Freeman. It shows what leadership really is and how duly inspired people can go against the odds and win the race. The last lines by Mandela - "I am the master of my fate, I am the captain of my soul." are truly inspiring. Recommended for watching not only to crazy rugby fans!

Leonard W (fr) wrote: 1 star for the pool Scene

Mark H (fr) wrote: If only for the soundtrack, this is a must see film. I figure this is Claire Denis' best effort yet.A minimum of narrative and sparse dialogue make this one a genuine brain-teaser. What does it offer besides a spooky story about some vague disease? Could it be there's a suggestion of reflections on modern day living here. or would this be a critique of factual history? I think the latter. It remains a suggestion.

Toby E (es) wrote: ... for 1989, not bad. an interesting (although pedantically so) study of primal nature, and innocence suborned. some of baxter's dialogue comes off canned, but then you remember - it's a dog. ugly looking beast, too. perfectly cast.

Blake P (ru) wrote: Cinematically, "Subway" is all style without shame - it's underground chase scenes, street fashion, tough talk, anomalous musical interludes, and behavioral flamboyancy, meaning and the much sought after thing known as depth all but pushed aside. Its materialism, though, is explainable and surprisingly welcome: "Subway" is among the era defining movies of cinma du look, a French film movement characterized by electric visual brio complemented by an ensemble comprised of alienated, sometimes eccentric youths. "Subway" is a comedy thriller that figures its aesthetic is its greatest asset, not emotional impact nor an intelligible storyline. Akin to the romanticism that indulges the cult of a tragic legend, it pushes past naturalism and heads straight for stylistic luxuriation. One could accuse "Subway" of being shallow, of being obsessed with presentation and not with the histrionics associated with a masterpiece of a film. But because it announces itself as a chic quasi-successor to the French New Wave almost immediately, we embrace its pep - its reliance on imagery is so effective because it doesn't strive to be anything more than a descent into style, its fascinating performances, inspired direction, and good enough plotline all things that impede complete vapidness. Luc Besson, an influential action filmmaker ("Nikita," "The Fifth Element"), co-wrote and directed "Subway" at the tender age of twenty-six, having only helmed two films before it. Like most cinematic masters, his talent is eminent even in his youngest of years. Material as niche-oriented as "Subway's" is not so easily accessible, but Besson's exuberant flair makes it amusing rather than off-puttingly pleased with itself. It's hard to resist, anyway. It stars a charming (and pre-"The Highlander") Christopher Lambert as Fred, a bottle blond, small-time crook taking refuge in various Paris Mtro stations after robbing the safe of a corrupted entrepreneur during a party. In no shape to think about anything besides evading his currently dire situation, which involves hot pursuit from his victim's henchman as well as the French police, he makes the most of his plight, familiarizing himself with the many colorful low-lifes that call the subway's underground their home. But Fred's scrappiness cannot serve him forever. There comes a point in which running is no longer an option, when trying to outsmart authorities will eventually be impossible. So this dooms a blossoming (albeit forced) relationship with Hlna (Isabelle Adjani), the much younger trophy wife of the aforementioned businessman. But when the plot predictably verges on tedium, Besson has all the right moves to make "Subway" feel alive - the film is exquisitely cast (I especially took a liking to Adjani's increasingly rebellious housewife who yearns for something dangerous), and the action is brainy but grounded in refreshing realism (its police versus roller-skated antagonist chase in the subway is superlative, and the opening car chase is a fittingly explosive way to introduce the film's untamable personality). It's a lot of fun, and Besson and his team of actors know plenty about providing seemingly unattainable cool. It's an essential look into a limited movement that gave France some of its most cinematically compelling works.

Harry W (fr) wrote: Despite being notoriously critically panned, a sequel to Saturday Night Fever (1977) directed by Sylvester Stallone sounded like an 80's-themed guilty pleasure on one level or another.Saturday Night Fever is arguably a classic, and there is a rare occasion where a classic needs a sequel. In the six years that have passed since Saturday Night Fever, the decades have changed. The former disco craze popularized by Saturday Night Fever that existed in the 1970's has long since peaked, experiencing a backlash from rock music fans as well as the notorious Disco Demolition Night of 1979. In essence, the disco glory days are long behind the year of 1983 and so the film must instead adhere to something more appropriate to the time. This hardly makes sense because the disco music and dance of Saturday Night Fever is what made it so iconic and a sequel which completely removes that notion would seem pointless from the get go. It takes little time before anyone not already aware of this notion will realize it while watching the actual film. The intro scene kicks Staying Alive off with an "inspirational" 80's montage, a theme director Sylvester Stallone is all too familiar with. While Frank Stallone's "Far From Over" kicks the film off with life, the things actually being depicted are an endless barrage of confusing dance moves including a lot of necks which seem to violently circulate in an attempt to pop off the heads of the humans they sit atop of, as well as some epileptic arm movements. The immediate realization I got from seeing all this is that Staying Alive's predominant focus is to take the legacy established by its predecessor and soil it with an attempt to be more like 1983's critically panned Flashdance than its actual predecessor. Much of the drama in the film is routine material which has already been covered once before and doesn't need to be repeated, though it spends the majority of the film playing second-fiddle to its obsession with dance sequences.In Saturday Night fever, the material holding the film up outside of its dancing sequences were the cultural relevance of its setting, the multiple interesting characters and the genuine edge of gritty material. With Staying Alive, the film plays it way too safe and puts the burden essentially all on the shoulders of John Travolta and a collection of supporting players. If the cast is not wandering through the scenery at a slow pace and pondering the meaning of existence, they are performing some really strange dance sequences. Like I said before, it is a lot of awkward arm and head movements which Sylvester Stallone considers to be intelligent dance moves. They may edit into a montage nicely with Frank Stallone music, but there is no inspiration in the. And rather than capturing the dance scenes as the spectacle needed to actually support the film as some kind of a guilty pleasure, Staying Alive has its dance numbers shot as if they were part of a music video. It's enough that the dance scenes are already so strangely choreographed, but they are filmed no better even though they are the most entertaining scenes in the film. But it's clear as far back as the beginning that they are already burdened by a visual style which plagues Staying Alive throughout every moment. The entire film has a rather murky visual style. Almost surreal with its darkness, Staying Alive is so lacking in sensible lighting that there is constantly a sense of shadow overtaking everything, leaving the colour palette rather monochromatic. As well as that, anything which is not extremely close to the camera ends up blurred into the background as if camouflaged with the colours around them. Elements of the soundtrack may have appeal such as Frank Stallone's Golden Globe-nominated song "Far From Over" which is a piece so rich with 80's groove that it perfectly captures the tone Sylvester Stallone is going for, but Staying Alive is hardly a treat on the eyes or the mind despite a soundtrack with some decent songs.As a result of all this, the cast are left stranded in one-dimensional roles and perform as such.Returning to his Academy Award nominated role of Tony Manero, John Travolta offers little innovation to the role. While his muscular stature is impressive and his ability to dance with raw passion captures the hot-blooded spirit of the iconic character, the material offers him no new challenges. He simply brings back some of the dying spirit that gave him charm in Saturday Night Fever and milks them for what he can in Staying Alive, though it is hardly enough to breathe any real life into material this lacklustre. John Travolta's handsome appeal may reach die-hard fans, but he has nothing new to offer in the acting department.Finola Hughes is not a brilliant newcomer. Though she keeps her energy active during the awkward dance scenes, there is nothing of value to her character and little iconic outside of her English accent amongst a crowd of generic American voices. She has little distinctive about her, and her attempts to bring the melodrama to life come off simply as an odd mix of pompous and pretentious with no positive results on the film's dramatic credibility, if there is any in the first place. Finola Hughes brings nothing memorable to Staying Alive and fails to inspire any kind of sparks with John Travolta.Cynthia Rhodes ends up with some of the most tediously sentimental material in the film. And though she has a genuine feeling of humanity about her as well as an energetic physical spirit, she cannot transcend the heavy weight laid down on her by the poor script.So though Staying Alive offers a distinctively 80's feeling thanks in part to the music of Frank Stallone, it is burdened by a story which goes nowhere but in in circles of decade-related cliches while abandoning the disco glory of the 1970's for a series of senseless dance sequences.

Karen H (us) wrote: 2015-08-30 pretty good, more drama than comedy though

Diego Martn (nl) wrote: Divertida,entretenida,para reirse.7/10