Autumn in New York

Autumn in New York

Autumn in New York follows the sexual exploits of Will Keane - New York restaurateur, infamous verging-on-50 playboy, master of the no-commitment seduction - until he runs into an unexpected dead end when he meets Charlotte Fielding. Charlotte is half Will's age and twice his match, a 21 year-old free spirit yearning to get out and taste the excitement of adult life.

Before he met 21-year-old free spirit Charlotte Fielding, forty-eight year old Will Keane was convinced that no love could last forever. After a heated one-night stand, they both realize that this love will last a lifetime. But, for Charlotte, a lifetime may be much shorter than either of them is prepared to accept. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Autumn in New York torrent reviews

Dustin B (es) wrote: Oppressively creepy.

bill s (kr) wrote: A "come on now'thriller with just too many improbable situations though Freeman is his usual solid self.

Christina H (fr) wrote: BEST MOVIE EVER!!!!!!!!

Bryan G (fr) wrote: "Here's to us, and those like us, damn few left."

Ola G (fr) wrote: "City Heat" is set in Kansas City during the 1930s. The Private investigator and former cop Mike Murphys (Burt Reynolds) partner Dehl Swift (Richard Roundtree) is brutally slayed, when he tries to blackmail a mobster with his secret accounting records. Lieutenant Speer (Clint Eastwood) and Mike Murphy who used to be Speers colleague, teams up to fight the mob, although they can't stand each other. Having both Burt Reynolds and Clint Eastwood in the leads should guarantee a hit back in the 80s, but this became a solid flop instead. No wonder when the balance between humour, drama and action is not working at all and the script is pretty poor I would say. There is no proper character development, which is one of the main problems. "City Heat" fails to deliver what you expect from the backdrop of this movie and this ends up on the minus shelf for both Eastwood and Reynolds in my book. This could have been so much better....

Benjamin W (ca) wrote: I'm not sure if this film won due to politics or because the vote was split between better films, but there are at least one or two movies that were made in 1933 that are not only better known, but are just better movies overall. Seems to me that there are far too many films that were made in the first few decades of the 20th century that essentially take the audience on a history lesson that ends with the current year. This film just happened to loosely tie them together through a single family. And yet, at the end of the film, I failed to see a solid point, even though they tried to feed one to me. No real focus, no real impression.

Skittle C (kr) wrote: Very confusing film, hard to keep up with but it was alright. May see it again but not one of my favorites.

Peter F (mx) wrote: A modest drama that makes up for it's trite script with a strong performance from Peter Fonda, and an unwavering earnest sense to it.

Tariq H (ru) wrote: Entertaining and well acted enough to pass away 80 mins with some fun thrills and shark attack horror.