A P.I. is burdened by her late father's reputation of a corrupt cop. When she starts investigating a spree of murders in a bad neighborhood, she discovers a web of corruption which just might shed some new light on her father's past. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
A P.I. is burdened by her late father's reputation as a corrupt cop.
You may also like
Backstreet Justice torrent reviews
Khaled M (fr) wrote: confusing ? yes and intentionally, but never boring. I loved the not-so-typical ending.
Kendall C (ru) wrote: A truly shocking Documentary. Its a powerful and scary film that shows you how there is a massive brainwashing movement in America. Everyone should see this film because its an eye opener. The bit where they were praying to the cardboard cut out of George W. Bush was creepy as hell.
Carlos M (de) wrote: Once in a lifetime a film/play like this comes up, one that works as a true mirror to our own faults, flaws and vices, embodied by four fascinating, multidimensional protagonists who hurt and manipulate one another, using their words as cruel weapons and revealing their innermost weaknesses in the process.
Jamie B (fr) wrote: Pretty lame. Rear window take on the Mimic series. Story is okay, but the actors suck and it lacks any suspense and is predictable.
James F (de) wrote: Really wanted to dislike from the start, but ironically my head was turned, not a big John Cusack fan it has to be said, but I can put up with him in this story.
Shane J (br) wrote: A background movie you can switch on and off of without really missing anything.harmless stupid watchable and average.
Grayson D (au) wrote: Poor remake of a 70's comedy.
Scott C (it) wrote: Super campy! Kinda fun.
Brandon B (mx) wrote: Jeff Bridges, Gary Busey and car racing.
Harry W (it) wrote: Serving as a collaboration between Howard Hawkes and John Wayne which was said to be one of the greatest western films of all time, Red River sounded like an exciting old-fashioned adventure.Since Red River has been frequently cited by director John Carpenter as one of his favourite films, I figured it would be a very distinctive feature. Unfortunately, I set my hopes a little high as it still had a heavy reliance on traditional western tropes and plot points. When I say that, I mean that the feature is one which relies on stereotypical tropes and iconography to keep audiences entertained while the story moves along at a slow pace. In actual fact, Red River moves along even slower than many other westerns because it attempts to branch out its focus onto multiple characters rather than relying strictly on the antics of the hero. In that regard it is innovative, but it is still slow in the process. It's not uncommon that the large amount of talking in Red River manages to slow down the pace of a film which comes from a genre already distinctive for its slow rate of movement, so audiences must be patient to embrace the full effect of this 133-minute feature. It's also no great testament to Howard Hawkes' storytelling that there are arbitrary text transitions at multiple points in the film since they appear too briefly and are written in a form of cursive which takes time to decipher.Nevertheless, Red River is no standard Cowboys and Indians fare. While Red River is not precisely a revisionist western film, it does display a step in a direction away from the more formulaic genre pictures John Wayne is known for. Red River serves as a spectacle of traditional western filmmaking with a more innovative use of character drama, sourcing intelligence in from the way it depicts the relationships between its characters. John Wayne leads a crew on a cattle drive in the story this time, but the other characters question his leadership rather than following blindly. This kind of distrust and conflict puts an involving spin on the narrative and creates a story of unprecedented characterization, creating a thought-provoking story. A key theme in western cinema is the change brought on by the frontier. Older sheriffs begin to lose their power in an age dominated by the young and the fittest, and this theme is epitomized by the title of Cormac McCarthy's postmodern western novel No Country for Old Men (2005). This theme was explored heavily during the 1960's western stories told by filmmakers such as Sam Peckinpah, but by the point of the 1940's the genre was just starting to touch upon its revisionist era. Red River displays a key step towards a change in generic conventions, and though it still maintains many traditional western elements there is enough clever new permutation in this film for it to stand out amongst the countless other John Wayne vehicles. Overall there are various characters in Red River that are of key lasting relevance to the narrative so the film is not a vanity project for the star, but one with wider ambitions which Howard Hawkes tackles.One thing that Howard Hawkes has always had a knack for is crafting a spectacle. With Red River, the man brings that on board without problem. With plenty of on-location scenery providing a realistic backdrop to the story, Red River uses plenty of western iconography to make for a visual experience. The cinematography captures it all nicely, and there is enough in the way of horse chases and fight scenes to entertain fans of the old-fashioned action. There isn't too much in the way of shootouts, but since the film is mostly narrative-driven and does have enough production values to support it, it manages to push on through its slow pace well enough. But the most impressive thing about Red River is the talented array of actors who never lose grip on the material.John Wayne delivers one of the finest performances of his career in Red River. It's not too common that we see John Wayne portraying a cowboy with as much thoughtful character developement as he puts into the role of Thomas Dunson, but Red River stands to gain a major benefit from the man's fine acting talents. Much of the film relies on the man's instinctive persona as the distinctive old-fashioned cowboy hero to keep things amusing, but his instinctive talents don't grow tiring. Fans of his can easily embrace the actor's natural charms, but for once audiences looking for something a little more innovative can enjoy the calibre of the man's talents. We see him far more angry than usual; savage in his battle against Native Americans and threatened by the dominant presence of his adoptive son. It's a vulnerable edge to the character which he attempts to disguise beneath his masculinity, but for once we see John Wayne playing a character who is both a strong hero and a human. He comes with insecurities and even an antagonistic nature to him, adding more dimensions to his character than he is known to do. John Wayne is an extremely solid lead in Red River.Montgomery Clift also takes a strong stand. While John Wayne is the central hero of the story, Montgomery Clift refuses to submit to him. With his own skills as a leading man, Montomery Clift takes command of his character with a firm grip over the role, one which he brings a fearless charisma to. While John Wayne is a more vulnerable figure, Montgomery Clift is the one playing the single-note archetype of the story which he does with sophistication and handsome appeal. Montgomery Clift is very blunt, consistently maintaining a kind of strength which is unmatched by the surrounding characters, making him an intensely figure. Him and John Wayne share a really intense chemistry, and having the two actors go against each other in Red River is really a remarkable sight.Walter Brennan is also a firm fit since he has a distinctively western nature about him which Howard Hawkes is able to work naturally into the film. Red River has the slow pace of any standard western film and a shortage of action to help support this during the long narrative, but Howard Hawkes still keeps it as a stylish film all while breaking new ground with revisionist themes and a very strong performance from John Wayne.
Joshua G (it) wrote: A horrifying, but beautiful, propaganda piece that supports the Nazis. Yes, it is a work of true evil, but Leni Refenstahl's filmmaking techniques are wonderfully influential, and her brilliant vision is what makes this one of the most visually interesting documentary films of all time.
Niels S (it) wrote: Lidt smkedelig biopic om James Braddock, der boksede sig ud af armod og elendighed under Depressionen. Se Rocky eller Raging Bull i stedet.
Jessica H (us) wrote: Christian Bale is perfect in his role, considering the film is in the wrong time frame.
Max H (us) wrote: This movie will have everyone wanting to see more from the performances of the great Judi Dench and Steve Coogan.
Kyle K (ru) wrote: eh. ok, for a tv movie.