Belle du Seigneur

Belle du Seigneur

English-language adaptation of Albert Cohen's epic Swiss tale of a tortured love affair between a high-ranking Jewish official and the protestant wife of one of his employees.

English-language adaptation of Albert Cohen's epic Swiss tale of a tortured love affair between a high-ranking Jewish official and the protestant wife of one of his employees. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Belle du Seigneur torrent reviews

Alex C (jp) wrote: Unintentionally funny so it gets one star. The only thing supernatural about this movie is how spectacularly bad it is in all facets.

Dan W (ru) wrote: Shotty at best. pretty horrid otherwise. Sadly, The Saucer Men From Mars was better than this...

Eduardo A (gb) wrote: if you tought that porn and

Laurie A (de) wrote: I'm sorry but if you are in love with someone after an hour, there's a good chance you're a psychopath. I am completely unable to get past that fact enough to find this movie believable.

Marilee A (br) wrote: Mira Sorvino really Took on this Role.Who knew this can happen in this Country, & in this Day & Time.I hope bringing Human Traffcikng to Light made a Difference & opened eyes enough to do something about the problem of Young Girls being kidnapped & forced into Prostitution.

Phillie E (kr) wrote: Not cute and not particularly funny.

Michael A (es) wrote: This is one of the worst examples of world-building gone wrong I have ever seen. It's just too ambitious for what it is, and takes the audience's involvement for granted. There is not one character driven moment that doesn't feel like it was cranked out of a sausage grinder. How can I convey this better? Hmmm... It's like none of the characters have any personality, backstory or identity until you're told (via lame exposition) that they have a personal trait, history, or identity right before the time it becomes important. The puppets are extremely poorly animated (the "main" dinosaur, "Rex," can't even get his eyes to focus in the same general direction - oh yeah, he looks nothing like the dinosaur on the cover, either). Hiring actors nobody ever heard of would be okay if they did a good job, but it just seems like they didn't have direction. The action sequences are too few and too far between for the run-time, and rather than spend effort on special effects some of the action is implied while they use stock footage of the sets. The only reason I'm not giving this half a star is because the production crew clearly put some effort into overcoming a budget shortfall, and that's appreciated, but the question remains: WHY DID THEY BOTHER? Even the SNES game based on this property isn't very good...

Aaron B (us) wrote: This is one of the greatest movies ever made.

Alex S (mx) wrote: Shoestring budget films are always a guilty pleasure of mine but when they add in film noir elements in environments that are ironically scenic in their emptiness, expectations are raised. Too bad they are not completely met as this is a film that struggles to make an impact to anyone not engrossed in the punk culture of 1980s California. Three musicians are on the run after pilfering money owed to them. Our lead man's wife tries to figure out why he is in Mexico and along the way she meets some colorful characters, including the band's players. It sounds bland because it is. There is a raw quality here (read: almost no professionalism, and it shows) and I find myself puzzled as to why this took four years to make. Not nearly as bad as people had said it was but nowhere near being a movie you need to see. And how sad is it to find myself more interested in background elements like Jeff's "Flesh for Frankenstine" poster on the wall of his house?

Matt W (de) wrote: A bunch of hilarious skits sewn together flawlessly. I definitely need to see this one again.

Timothy J (ca) wrote: Dragonfyre is a film about fantasy creatures coming to earth to find a fugitive princess and the US military veteran who becomes the guardian who can save her.Plot wise the concept is cheesy but fun, orcs and a dragon running around in the American west is fun. Unfortunately there are too many unanswered questions, like why are the orcs and the crazy witch lady after the princess? How many orcs are there, even approximately (a single establishing shot of the whole orcish horde would have fixed that). Why does White Feather know all this stuff, or do we just assume that all Native Americans know mystical stuff? Why is the big orc suddenly unhappy with the fate of his people? Why do the orcs just give up at the end?Really the plot just needed a few more scenes for background, a few more establishing shots, and it would have been fine.There's no question that the first act of the movie is almost unwatchable, with constant shaky cam and frequent dutch angles even in establishing shots or shots that *try* to hold on text. Latter on though, the camera work goes into the competent range, and the shots are reasonably well composed.While the orcs looked like extras from a Lord of the Rings movie, the dragon looked surprisingly good, it was well modeled, textured, and animated. Really, you could just watch the dragon scenes and skip the rest of the movie.All of the blood, explosions, and fire are badly composited CG effects, and the fire is especially bad, in one scene the whole of our hero's house explodes in fire after the dragon set the roof on fire (in itself a rather baffling occurrence, was there a gas leak?). Later the house is shown with just the roof on fire, no broken glass, and no fire damage bellow the top few feet of the house.While the dragon was great (and looked nothing like the thumbnail art on Netflix or the poster on Rotten Tomatoes, which is s shame, since I like the movie's dragon better) honestly they should have spent some of that dragon money on a CG orc horde establish shot, and some CG fire that has a smoother color gradient.Overall most of the movie is either unwatchablly shot or bafflingly incoherent and unexplained. Someone should make a "fan" edit of the film that cuts out every scene not involving the dragon.

Nasu N (kr) wrote: Kingsman is an amazing movie that is a hybrid between the Hunger Games and James Bond. It's full of humor and old school action that you will remember, each actor has done a good job expressing their character. Ironically, it's a fresh new take on classic thriller-action movies

Cher C (br) wrote: its so sad but some parts are goog

Renee L (ru) wrote: I think that 1989 was an especially good year for bad movies. This one, is, uh... very silly. The hair is amazing, but the best thing about this movie is Michael Richards. If you were a 14-year old boy in 1989, you probably think this movie is the shiz.