Beneath the 12-Mile Reef

Beneath the 12-Mile Reef

Mike and Tony Petrakis are a Greek father and son team who dive for sponges off the coast of Florida. After they are robbed by crooks, Arnold and the Rhys brothers, Mike decides to take his men to the dangerous 12-mile reef to dive for more sponges. Mike suffers a fatal accident when he falls from the reef leaving Tony to carry on the business. But now he has a companion, Gwyneth Rhys.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:102 minutes
  • Release:1953
  • Language:English,Greek
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:dancer,   boat,   fire,  

Mike and Tony Petrakis are a Greek father and son team who dive for sponges off the coast of Florida. After they are robbed by crooks, Arnold and the Rhys brothers, Mike decides to take his... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Beneath the 12-Mile Reef torrent reviews

Stefano F (nl) wrote: Good movie. Really enjoyed the 1960s feeling. Better prequel than its predecessor.

Michael L (mx) wrote: FAREWELL MY QUEEN beautifully captures the chaos and secrecy surrounding the French court in the days immediately following the storming of the Bastille. By presenting the drama through the eyes of Marie Antoinette's reader, director Benoit Jacquot shies away from the usual trappings of costume dramas by never relishing that which was truly despised by the aristocracy's subjects. The film is perfectly acted, with a score that plows into the mind, unfortunately, FAREWELL MY QUEEN also falls a bit flat in it's overlong middle section but ends beautifully. FAREWELL MY QUEEN's intimate view of Versailles is at times staggering and the representation of Marie Antoinette and her relationship to her servants is consistently complex and true to the proceedings. At times, the film feels downright brilliant but then disappoints and never becomes the full-blooded work it could have been. In many ways, it's typical for Jacquot has made consistently good films that just never ingrain themselves ...

Hallie G (kr) wrote: At first I was a little annoyed by the bickering dialogue style and the exceedingly bizarre eccentricities of the French family, but toward the end (around the time of the gallery opening) I began to develop a greater appreciation for its strange absurdities throughout.

Erica T (ca) wrote: I love mumblecore for some reason, this was a good film.

Rebecca B (us) wrote: British filmakers are so special to show Victorian times. Delicacy, great dark colors, great! Love this movie.

Jeremy W (ca) wrote: Kiyoshi Kurosawa committed this film to celluloid long before environmental disaster was a burgeoning field of interest to the general public (it was written in the late 80's). This film exemplifies the existential questioning we all endure and provides cryptic answers that lie within the forest. Because of this, the ending of this movie left me feeling cold--very, very cold.

Jon P (mx) wrote: Tantalisingly tense and beautifully performed, Pedro Almodovar's passionate 1997 drama never delivers a dull moment. Almodovar's film is an unhinged spiral of chaotic character conflict and raw, unabashed drama that thrusts its way to a quivering climax with truly thrilling vigour. A modern classic of Spanish cinema and by far one of the great auteur's finest works to date.

J D M (fr) wrote: THE BEST Crispin Glover movie of all time.

Jens T (nl) wrote: Luis Buuel's Tristana takes place in the early nineteenth century in Spain in a avarage catholic town. We follow the life of the 19-years-old girl named Tristana (Deneuve) who is married to her stepfather Don Lope, who gives her very limited freedom, it's even litmited when it comes to, leaving the house without the Don's promission. But she one day decides to go out, and then she falls in love with a painter, how will this end? Will she runaway from her Don or stay with him? Tristana is a good and well fought story, specialy to watch and analyze the drastics changes in the Deneuve character. Thumbs up.

Miranda B (ru) wrote: I thought this was a good movie, enjoyed it

Richard D (ca) wrote: I'm not a Nolan-enthusiast, so I'm pleasantly surprised by how much I actually like this film. It has a clever, dense plot that I think is quite masterfully constructed, offering just enough exposition to allow you to follow what's going on without resorting to tedious explanatory scenes that don't advance the plot. I think I would like the film even more if Nolan had not directed it. I find his style to be oppressively heavy, and I think it weighs down what should be a lighter, more fun film.

Ahmed B (jp) wrote: Another Hugh Grant comedy that is pleasant to watch