Young-Hoon (Kim Seung-Woo) works for his mother’s restaurant, but he prefers hanging out with his friends. He then meets Yeun-ah (Jang Jin-Young), a tough lady that works in a room salon as a barmaid. She takes the initiative by coming to his restaurant, when he is working, and propositions him in a playful way. They become a couple, but their relationship is always volatile. They fight constantly (physically and verbally), but the next moment kiss and make up. Meanwhile, Young-Hoon already has another girlfriend, who is his finance! When his mother learns about his new girlfriend Yeun-ah, she pushes her son to get married to his finance. Even after he marries his finance, Young-Hoon continues his relationship with Yeun-ah. When Young-Hoon’s wife gets pregnant, Yeun-ah starts to feel insecure about their relationship and takes matter into her own hands. She decides to call Young-Hoon’s wife and tell her everything about their relationship.
Marah R (ca) wrote: Compelling story with a genuine touch. Although there are a few laughs in between, the overall movie is slow and boring at times. Definitely not the best movie for Julianne Moore.
Lasse G (br) wrote: It has really been a popular trend lately, remaking old classic cartoons into live action movies. And that was also done with "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs," but it's being redone and Eric, the Huntsman is getting a much bigger role this time around. This movie constantly tries to remind you that you are actually watching a remake of an old fairytale, but that they have done some changes, but it's not like we ever need to be reminded of that because we can see it and the only thing that is basically the same are some of the characters. Snow White and the Huntsman are some of the characters that we recognize and then not really. Then the dwarfs, but they have been changed for something that isn't exactly positive. The performances by Chris Hemsworth and Charlize Theron are great and they really knock it out of the park, even though the story doesn't really do that much to help the characters at all. Kristen Stewart is fine in the movie, but her performance only change slightly from her horrible performance in "The Twilight Saga" movies. The movie isn't really that good and it definitely doesn't get better no matter how many times you watch it.
Matt B (nl) wrote: Ugh. I expected so much more out of Piranha 3DD. For starters, it's called Piranha 3DD. DD (DOUBLE D). Already that means that this should be as outrageous as the first movie. It's not. At only 83 minutes (with 10 of them being the end credits), this sequel just gets really dumb. The only memorable scene is when a piranha comes out of Katrina Bowden's vagina.....DURING INTERCOURSE. The rest of the movie is garbage.
Markus S (gb) wrote: Nice dance moves, but the story was kinda lame.
Art S (it) wrote: Jafar Panahi's film of girls trying to get into a soccer match in Iran (where they are forbidden) reminded me of Medium Cool, in that both films feature actors thrust into a real situation; that is, the fictional story is inserted into a real event (presumably with permission, although now that Panahi has been sentenced to six years in prison and banned from making films for 20 years, this isn't a given). Some formalist pleasures here too, as the camera and the girls remain largely offside, away from the game and real people (even going so far as to offer some "commentating" on the unseen -- but always heard -- game rather than showing it). But after Iran wins and gains entry to the World Cup, the very real celebrations drown out the movie and offer the girls a (temporary) escape.
Jenn M (ca) wrote: It was really hard to get into. It starts off as two different stories that eventually meet. I love cassell and reno but this really didn't show their true talents at all. Felt like I was watching a British crime drama except it was all in French
Alex B (gb) wrote: Ted Raimi is really great and there's enough zany bizarro shit to keep me interested. Not as awesome as I was kind of hoping and expecting, but it's overall pretty entertaining.
Steve G (de) wrote: For some reason, I'm a sucker for depression-era films -- and this is one of the better ones.The villains at the end of this movie are among the worst I've ever seen.The "what do you look like?" scene was beautiful. Unfortunately, it only suffers from a slight lack of destination.Though I must say, that end scene totally bothered me. It turned the movie into something inauthentic, in a way. Even if it was intended to be symbolic, it steals the story of some efficacy. Would've been much better without the man back (if you've seen it, you know). Bad play.Forced an excessively figurative conclusion that I believe robs the film of true spirituality as seen in their lives. Didn't need to push it quite so hard to completely take the film in a totally different direction.Otherwise, a lovely film.
Ane B (de) wrote: I didn't have much fun with this one, It starts off great, but then sadly Mel Brooks comes to the stage. He is kind of an annoying lead, with bad comedic presence and even worse acting. A lot of jokes are pretty childish, but I will admit there is this one brilliant scene that made this a worthy watch for me. That "private party" scene made me and my friends almost die of laughter. Apart from that, it's not really a comedy to get excited for in my opinion.
Douglas M (mx) wrote: As a teenager, I used to take the subway into Manhattan Saturday mornings and go to the movies. One of the most memorable of these films was without a doubt 'Wait Until Dark'. This taut thriller still stands far above other more recent entries into this genre. The reason for this persistence in excellence is this film does not depend on the typical slasher flicks special effects. These blood and gore scenes are good for a moment but soon become old. Wait Until Dark depends more on the human mind, a technique that can thrill far more than any fake blood and dismembered body parts. Susy (Audrey Hepburn) is a young woman who lives in New York City, is married to a successful photographer (Efrem Zimbalist Jr), and she is blind. While her husband is on a business trip, a beautiful blond slips a doll into his belongings, one that conceals a large quantity of heroin. The blond winds up dead (in Suzy's apartment), and the doll is also somewhere in the apartment. The main crook Roat (Alan Arkin) is determined to get the drugs back and deceptively enlists the aid of two other criminals, Mike (Richard Crenna) and Carlino (Jack Weston). The three men will pose as police officers to deceive the poor blind girl into letting them into the apartment where they can search for the drug right under her nose.What ensues is a brilliantly orchestrated cat and mouse game largely between Roan and Suzy which itself sets this film above the typical Hollywood thriller. Rather than sitting back and surrendering to gory effects the audience is expected to think, to truly care about Suzy and root for her survival. Suzy is not the usual hapless damsel in distress; she is bright, resourceful and perceptive, more than a match for the clever Roat. Being blind turns out not to be a disadvantage to Suzy. It gives her the ability to notice little things the sighted would have overlooked. Things like furniture slightly moved the constant playing with the window blinds (a signal between the crooks) and the movements of the men throughout her apartment. It dawns on Suzy that something is amiss and she begins to prepare for the worse. While not a criminal mastermind Roat devises a plan that seemingly is brilliant. He underestimates how easy it will be to fool the blind woman but the manner in which he manipulates the other two men is inspired. The ending is shrouded in darkness. When I saw this film in my youth, the gimmick was for the theater to dim the house lights to the edge of the legal limit to accentuate the tension. It did, and I remember it now several decades later. You might want to try this at home.One of the factors that help to propel this film to the heights it has achieved is the cast. Audrey Hepburn takes a character that normally would be considered helpless and turns her around into a sharp and incredibly bright young woman. Her performance lulls the audience into accepting her as determined but physically helpless only to watch her inner strength and determination forced to the surface. There is a spectacular beauty to how Hepburn places the character development of Suzy carefully, gradually allowing the audience's empathy to grow. Little hints to the self-reliance given from the start but as the film progresses we see just how strong she is. Arkin gives the performance of his lifetime here. He plays three characters in his plot against Suzy, Roat, Roat Jr. and Roat Sr. the subtle difference in how he plays each role is an exhibition of how an actor should approach a character. What impressed me most here is the amount of control these two leads display. They take the time and effort required to allow the audience to get to know these people, what motivates them and what is behind their reactions. Crenna and Weston give solid performances as the ancillary characters here. Each of these two men is capable of strong performances, and they give them to us. As low-level crooks, they are baited by Roat, manipulated and controlled by him. Their desperation is visceral; the audience can feel the emotions these men hold just under the surface.Director Terence Young knows how to please an audience. He is responsible for three of the early (and best) James Bind films, 'Doctor No,' 'From Russia with Love' and 'Thunderball.' You may wonder if a director used to such action-oriented films can handle a far more cerebral thriller, the answer is a resounding yes. His control of the all important pacing is gifted. While most thrillers seem to feel that an initial shock required at the start of the film, Young give the audience time to acclimate to the situations and characters. He develops the plot slowly, like a fine dinner left to simmer and merges the flavors. He exhibits the same control of the lighting. Due to the specifics of this film, this is even greater than usual. As the ending approaches the lights dim, one by one, darkening the theater reinforcing the events on screen. Shadows become something out of a nightmare as our concern for the plight of Suzy increases. Young manipulates the emotions of the audience to perfection.This film is an astounding example how actors, each great in their right, can interact with such amazing perfection that the synergy derived by the cast is nothing short of brilliant. Mr. Zimbalist and Mr. Weston were so brilliant in their portrayal of the soldier villains Mike and Carlino that a substantial baseline established the foundation for the coming terror flawlessly.It is the cat and mouse game between the ruthless, expertly driven criminal and a young blind woman that takes the suspense and escalating terror to heights beyond any expectations the audience might have brought into the theater. Overall the mastering of this Blu-ray is excellent. Considering the age of the source material, you can expect some variation in the balance of light and dark scenes. The slight grain found in the previous DVD release was eradicated during the 'upgrading process' to high definition. The source material had to be a near pristine 35mm to achieve such a crisp video. Especially appreciated is the greater clarity in the many dimly lit scenes. The nature of the story requires the set be in nearly total darkness. On the DVDthe figures are little more than dark gray blobs, now transformed into discernable characters. Among the strongest reasons I had driving my excitement to receive a copy of this release for preview was the thought od experiencing a favorite film with video and audio superior to my initial viewing so many years ago.Presenting the soundtrack in its original mono format is always appreciated by film purists. Altering the video's aspect ratio is tantamount to heresy, but fewer cinephiles are that concerned with alterations to the audio. The source material didn't provide a lot of sound elements to process, but the transition to DTS High Definition Audio allowed for a robust spectrum of the audio. It comes across as a bit more oriented to center stage, reinforcing the overall feel and look which emulates a live stage performance. There are no extremes in bass or treble here. On the plus side, it does give a live stage feel to the film. I watched this film bypassing the bit stream audio and using the Prologic 'Live' mode for more a theatrical feel to the experience. The extras are interesting. There is a stroll down memory lane by Alan Arkin and producer Mel Ferrer detailing just what went into the making of this classic. There is also a little featurette chronicling how this adaptation of this work from the original stage production. Rounding out the extras are a few trailers. Don't 'wait,' get this one Blu-ray even if you already own the Blu-ray and enjoy a great film experience.
Colin K (gb) wrote: Merrick! Great villian!
Ahmed B (nl) wrote: Became this generation's Love Story