Bloody Pit of Horror

Bloody Pit of Horror

A photographer and his models go to an old, abandoned castle for a photo shoot. Unbeknownst to them, the castle is inhabited by a lunatic who believes himself to be the reincarnated spirit of a 17th-century executioner whose job it is to protect the castle against intruders.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:87 minutes
  • Release:1965
  • Language:Italian
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:murder,   torture,   camera,  

A photographer and his models go to an old, abandoned castle to shoot some sexy covers for horror novels. Unbeknownst to them, the castle is inhabited by a lunatic who believes himself to ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Bloody Pit of Horror torrent reviews

Oscar S (mx) wrote: blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

Kate L (ag) wrote: A crazy film... about acting, I believe. It's whimsical, moving, and thought-provoking. The segment about Mocap actors is visually stunning, the bit about killing Theo is uncanny, and the part about old man and his niece--my favorite segment--seems to be the most exquisite ode to acting, but it also left me thinking about human experience and reality in general. (The scene reminds me of Antonioni's tennis scene in Blow Up.)

Betty W (us) wrote: This movie was so out there. It was horrible of course, but that guy who had the parasite in him?Holy Crap he was cool. He had the oddest looking face and the most piercing blue eyes; I was intimidated by him.

Jason Y (de) wrote: [b]DVD[/b] First Viewing, 1 Riedelsheimer film seen For fans of [i]Winged Migration[/i] only...

Andrew D (fr) wrote: Enjoyable UK film with good storyline.

Paul G (kr) wrote: Awesomely erotic. My most favorite female vampire ever.

Ian R (gb) wrote: Arguably the best Ernest movie and great for kids. It's got some laughs and a decent performance, but its not Hamlet, so don't expect greatness.

Angelica N (kr) wrote: gnda n2 ..!!!! grabe nk2tawa

Alex r (mx) wrote: Destroy all Monster is a much needed improvement over the awful Son of Godzilla. This a fine return to the traditional elements of what you can expect from a standard Godzilla picture and though lacking in effective plot, it still boasts some great entertainment value that will certainly delight fans of the series. The plot could certainly have used a rewrite, and it never really does take off, but it is a back to basics movie that isn't silly like Son of Godzilla. Destroy All Monsters is quite entertaining from start to finish. The film has lots of monster action and is what makes it a fun movie that make Son of Godzilla forgettable movie. Don't expect anything great however, as like every other film in the series has its flaws, and it is clear that the filmmakers are struggling to keep the ideas fresh and thrilling. Like I've said in many of my other reviews, there is only so far you can go with this formula, and it is predictable, yet at the same is mindless entertainment value that won't disappoint due to the fact that you know what you want in a Godzilla film, and that's various monsters battling it out with Godzilla. In terms of action and thrills, this has got to be one of the better films that combine various creatures. The plot is basic, predictable, but it's the traditional Godzilla formula that you enjoy. Although not a great movie, this is good for what it is, and it wipes the slate clean with a familiar idea. This one should make fans happy, and is fun despite its flaws.

Matt D (gb) wrote: Two girls named Stanley and Roy.Hattie McDaniel shows her stuff nicely.

Paul B (gb) wrote: "The Pacino speech" is motivational genius. Other than this great moment, this movie is not good.

Alexander C (fr) wrote: A rather good remake which is equal to the original. Heck of a soundtrack too, this one i could re-watch. Think one of the actors is a relation Tony Curran. :D

Leanne M (mx) wrote: 'Oh Samuel what was that about?' This film was not good and have given it one star because i love Samuel. It is so slow and bizarre with some unnessesary scenes... No good indeed!!