Brotherhood of Blood

Brotherhood of Blood

Driven by vengeance, thirsty for blood... and damned to hell! Guarded by vampires and chained in a dark cellar by the mighty vampire King Pashek, crack vampire hunter Carrie Rieger's time is running out.her relentless quest to crush the world's undead scourge has brought her to the home of Pashek. But she is not here to hill him. Instead she wishes to join forces with her immortal enemies in an effort to rise up against an even more terrifying threat, one that would chill the soul of even the most blood-thirsty vampire; the mighty vampire demon Vlad Kossel.Thought to have been killed many hundreds of years ago, Kossel has now returned to wreak bloody vengeance on his kind before enslaving humanity. He will destroy everything in his path and there is only one hunter who can stop him...

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:88 minutes
  • Release:2007
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:escape,   ring,   torture,  

Claustrophobic thriller about a team of vampire hunters who infiltrate a nest of undead to rescue one of their own. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Brotherhood of Blood torrent reviews

Julia B (it) wrote: C'mon Kate!!! You can do better than this! What an anticlimactic mess of a movie!

Duke V (de) wrote: Really touching and very awesome story ,inspiring to say the least, Spritually Beautiful and awesome cast, Academy and Oscar worthy rolls by all but especially Will he really needs not be reconized because he' s already there by us the people , much respect and love from us all the same thing with Seven Pounds and many others so you keep doing what you do???

Daniel D (fr) wrote: Extremely violent but what I expected

Jacob M (kr) wrote: A movie only die-hard lacrosse fans will enjoy. If your not one of these, then I suggest you don't check this one out. But I liked it.

Dean K (ag) wrote: This could have been so much better. Nice idea but on a tight budget, and thin plot lines it doesn't live up to potential. I thought Arielle Kebbel being in this might be a good sign, but it's not up to the usual quality of films she is in.I also have to add I really don't understand why they try to Americanise this film? It was obvious to me this was made in the UK, Northern Ireland, so why not set it there? Why try to make out it's a small town in America? Only for those who don't mind low budget horrors.

Kailey O (jp) wrote: This movie was okay. I really thought Tom was a great character and I hated the ending, but it was good.

Alec B (ca) wrote: I became ill watching this, which was the intended effect. Its one-sided, but honestly does the other side deserve a voice?

Ben B (ag) wrote: Across the Universe is directed by Julie Taymor and is a love story structured around a soundtrack of songs from the Beatles.There really isn't much to say about this except that it just didn't work for me. As interesting as it might sound, Across the Universe is a pretty run-of-the-mill story covered up by poppy versions of familiar hits. I'm sorry, but a dramatic cover of "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" doesn't hold a candle to the original. This movie reminded me a lot of Rock of Ages, though it isn't nearly as big of a disaster. As one who appreciates music, I'm not opposed to covers of famous songs, but, like an old movie being remade, there has to be something new brought to the table to justify its existence. Across the Universe's soundtrack is full of unjustified remakes performed by forgettable actors in an overall forgettable movie. With a run-time of over 2 hours, this movie drags on and on until finally ending with the cheese being applied heavily. Even if you dig musical movies, you can find way better options than Across the Universe.Final grade: D+-Ben

Mohammed A (br) wrote: It's should've been better than this

Paul D (gb) wrote: It borrows a lot from other films and it shows, but sadly hardly anything good. The story away from the shark is laughable and it has acting to match.

amy r (nl) wrote: i loved the munsters and still do!

Devon B (us) wrote: Who's supposed to be the good guy here? Marlon Brando directs (his one lone directing credit) and stars in this mexican-american western. As the movie opens, Rio (Brando) and Dad (Karl Malden), a pair of bandits, are cornered up on a hill by Rurales. Dad sneaks off to get fresh horses, but winds up abandoning Rio to the law, and he does 5 years of hard time in a Sonora prison. When Rio next catches up with Dad, Monterey, California, and Dad is living the fat life as the elected sheriff with a new wife and adopted daughter. Even though Dad has moved on and Rio has not, neither man is willing to forgive and forget the past. For Dad, it's fear and guilt that fuel his hatred of Rio; for Rio, while it's true he has a strong desire for justice, there is perhaps a certain amount of jealousy and resentment that people around him change while he stays the same. While Rio is obviously a tough guy and a expert gunslinger, he's rendered ineffectual for most of the movie by the powers that be. There is an air of authenticity to One-Eyed Jacks, from Bob Amory's greasy face (Ben Johnson did an excellent job here as one of the few characters who was actually true to himself) to colloquialisms that sounded genuine in the old west setting. From Karl Malden and Ben Johnson, to Larry Duran (Rio's mexican partner) and Pina Pellicer (Rio's love interest, Louisa- an enchantingly unique beauty whose life was cut short in real life by depression and suicide), Brando the actor steps aside as Brando the director fleshes out these characters and gives his actors a chance to shine. It's all brought together with great story-telling. There are some truly great westerns that have been made throughout the last century, the lesser known One-Eyed Jacks deserves to be counted among the best.

danny d (ag) wrote: a rare remake of a film directed by the same auter of the original, ozu retells his silent 1934 classic with the use of sound, dialogue, and color cinematography. suprisingly the only reason this film is even slightly better than the original is ozu's ability to flesh out the story more with 30 extra minutes and talking actors, but the original silent is so amazing that both films should be seen as top notch films. this version is more light hearted than the original but still dark in its own ways, and the telling of this father/son story is beautiful and effective. a truly wonderful film.