A subversive tale that interlaces five stories set in Los Angeles, where no taboo is left unexplored as each character careens toward a dark and often comic fate. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
A subversive tale that interlaces five stories set in Los Angeles, where no taboo is left unexplored as each character careens toward a dark and often comic fate
- Stars:Tiffany Shepis, Louis Mandylor, Scott Anthony Leet, Patti Tindall, Jonathan Northover, Sebastian Kunnappilly, Noah Todd, Joe Ricci, Zena Otsuka, David C. Hayes, Kristina Wayborn, Ed Lauter, Shane Dean, Jamie Chung, Rosamund Pike, Dylan McDermott, Shannen Doherty, Zoe Saldana, Nick Stahl, Robert Hoffman, Paz Vega, Peter Macdissi, Anson Mount, Emily Meade, Lake Bell, Tiara McKinney, Adriana Barraza, Jake Austin Walker,
You may also like
Burning Palms torrent reviews
Randy P (kr) wrote: The two lead characters, Brad and Sergio, are a perfect match - a well-done take on not just Paranormal Activity-type movies but a refreshing buddy movie that shows normal guys with normal (alright...maybe highly sensitized urges!) dealing with a scary, but horny, abnormal situation! Big belly laughs, and subtle jokes abound. Absolute high-energy - making the most of a talented comedic cast. A definite go-see if you want a good time!
Geoff J (es) wrote: A good idea, undermined by poor acting
Chris R (us) wrote: I rarely apply the "Avoid like the Plague" rating to a movie but this one earned it. Not a single redeemable quality; The Sound level is all over the place, there is no acting other then from LeFevre, The point of the movie is obscured by some half-assed Anti-Abortion message, a device officially refereed to as the "infinite energy machine", that the "Scientist" is using to try and trap the energy of a dead loved one with (I think), turns out to be some sort of ascension machine. This movie shoudl have had Paris Hilton in it.
Luke B (ag) wrote: This is a review of the 3 hour miniseries version, rather than the heavily edited 100 minute cut. I had originally only planned to watch Part 1 today, but I was sucked in and quickly put on Part 2. That has to say something. The film certainly grabbed me, but I must admit to being a sucker for disaster movies. It had all the twists and turns you would expect. Cruel public officials, broken marriages, scientists deemed crackpots turning out to be right all along. With three hours to get through, it certainly covers all the angles. After a storm hits Scotland, it soon becomes apparent that the storm will sweep along the east coast of England and eventually flood London. The cast is varied from bad roles and bad performances, bad roles but good performances, and passable roles good performances. Carlyle and Gilsig are the usual divorced couple, forced back together by this natural disaster. Courtenay is Carlyle's estranged father, they are also forced back together due to the flood, as they all happen to work within the parameters of the same field. Most notable are smaller performances from Nigel Planer as the head of the MET office who failed to predict the storm. He feels genuine grief over the tragedy he could have helped avoided and an early performance by Tom Hardy. He is the only real person that feels human throughout. He has some completely unrelated dialogue regarding his mates and a dog. It is perhaps the only time we hear somebody talk about something other than the weather. Seeing a big disaster in England is a welcome change and the effects were actually quite good. The film does have many flaws though. It is incredibly predictable and the bulk of dialogue is exposition or corny family feuds. The editing is annoying, as it constantly freezes and shows us the time, or flashes back to something we saw just minutes a go. The music is very repetitive. I had the main 'dramatic' tune down within 3 minutes (no exaggeration). Towards the end of the second part, all the real threat is over with and they spend a good forty minutes unflooding London. This makes for a film that has reached its climax much earlier. However, if you like seeing disaster films just to see how different parts of the government would react, this is mostly competent.
Mikhael E (nl) wrote: A not bad film of emerging sexuality and the problems associated with it; definitley taking its cue from "My beautiful laundrette", it had up and down moments plot / story / engagement-wise, but the last 30 minutes or so was quite compelling
victor l (br) wrote: :fresh: [b][i]Cuba [/i][/b]is an amazing historical drama and you believe all the events thanks to the excellent production: the costumes, the art direction, the beautiful music and the performances of Sean Connery and Brooke Adams who carry the leading roles and through their personal lives they guide the process of the Cuban revolution that ended with Castro's arrive to power. Highly recommended.
Private U (au) wrote: Gangster-film p pakkis-norsk. Bra!
Greg W (br) wrote: ok chop sokky actioner and lost review!