Carsten Bang: Plukker kameler

Carsten Bang: Plukker kameler

I ”Plukker kameler” giver Bang sit bud på, hvordan man tackler uafklarede problemer med andre - og hvordan man accepterer dét, der egentlig strider imod ens idealer og ønsker; Man plukker kameler! Alle kommenterer og konfronterer alt og alle. Men hvad sker der ved det? Ingenting. Der er ingen selvransagelse og derfor ingen konsekvenser. Ingen lærer noget. Det hele går i ring. Fordi ingen plukker kameler!

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:0 minutes
  • Release:2012
  • Language:Danish
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:joke,   stand up comedy,  
  • Category:Comedy
  • Stars:Carsten Bang
  • Uploader:Chich1Phat
  • Country:Denmark
  • Director:N/A
  • Writer:Carsten Bang

I ”Plukker kameler” giver Bang sit bud på, hvordan man tackler uafklarede problemer med andre - og hvordan man accepterer dét, der egentlig strider imod ens idealer og ønsker; Man plukker kameler! Alle kommenterer og konfronterer alt og alle. Men hvad sker der ved det? Ingenting. Der er ingen selvransagelse og derfor ingen konsekvenser. Ingen lærer noget. Det hele går i ring. Fordi ingen plukker kameler! . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Carsten Bang: Plukker kameler torrent reviews

George M (ca) wrote: The Peanuts gang never disappoints me. This is a new release of Charlie Brown and the Gang produced by Craig Schulz, Charles Schulz's son. It is a good attempt to reproducing the magic by Charles Schultz and Bill Melendez, but falls a little short. Of course you cannot expect the original combination of Schultz and Melendez to be reproduced, but they are gone so I will take what I can get.

Michael P (nl) wrote: A fantastic performance from Christopher Eccleston.

Tasha J (ru) wrote: loved it i cry a lot

Neil R (it) wrote: Love this film, Kyle MacLachlan was good but not really Cary Grant. This has some amazing one liners and Suleka Matthew is brilliant and so beautiful in this film. Everyone should see this love story, it is the oldest in the book, "Boy meets boy. Boy loses boy and goes to Toronto. Boy gets back with boy in London." Okay maybe not the oldest!

Shane D (es) wrote: One of Hanks' best. A heartbreaking ending. Quality stuff.

Dean M (mx) wrote: Hong Kong's dominance over American action filmmaking didn't stop visual effects wizard-turned-director Steve Wang from creating a film that not only matches the best modern Hong Kong martial arts productions, but surpasses many of them. In fact, it only inspired him. Beyond Wang's vision, the keys to Drive's success are two men; action director Koichi Sakamoto and martial arts star Mark Dacascos. The strengths of this film could have stopped here and the production would have remained a worthy effort, but a very solid script from Scott Phillips and excellent performances from the supporting cast. I was exciting to see Dacascos makes his incredible kicking, punching, flipping, you name it. He's got speed, power, and grace. Brittany Murphy is perfect as a bubbly brunette armed with salacious charm Deliverance Bodine who manages to pull off being humourous, immature, insane, and desirable all at the same time. and Kadeem Hardison is the film's chief comedian and delivers a regular stream of decent one-liners, mostly adlibbed.The choreography and execution of fighting is stunning, especially considering the limited time available. All of the fights are outstanding, although the motel brawl and the film(TM)s final match are extra special. This is action really done Hong Kong style, old school.

William A (fr) wrote: What! Mel Brooks homeless.

Baurushan J (us) wrote: The story is about 17-year-old David Axelrod played by Martin Hewitt, some guy whose career went nowhere falls in love with 15-year-old Jade Butterfield played by Brooke Shields. Jade is caught by her dad Hugh played by Don Murray and is forced not to meet David ever again when Hugh realises that Jade has lack of sleeping, is taking sleeping pills and this has affected her grades. Unable to stay away from her just for 30 days just so that Jade can pass her exams and graduate, one of David's friends jokingly suggests to kidnap her or burn the entire family house down. So he takes option number two and is jailed for a couple of years. He goes to visit them where they have relocated in Manhattan and a fight breaks out between David and Jade's older brother making David end up in a mental hospital. The film ends with Jade visiting him there. Based on a novel by the same name by Scott Spencer, I'm glad that the film made a few changes to the source material and here's why: At the end of the book, David is released from the mental hospital and is married to an unnamed woman and Jade is married to someone else during when David was in the mental hospital. If they had used that ending, I know the movie would have been a lot darker but it would jave just come out as another Romeo and Juliet-type romance-drama. Again I say, I'm glad they made that change otherwise this movie would have changed the title from Endless Love to Ended Love. We want the title to always match with whatever we're filming or writing and that's why in this case, it works here. The film introduces us to two young actors who eventually grew up and gained a cult following: Tom Cruise who was just under age-20 then and James Spader who had just passed the 20-age mark then. Cruise having a short cameo was introduced as David's second friend Billy who inspires David to burn the Butterfield family's house down after Billy says he was once appreciated a hero by his parents for setting the house on fire with a pile of newspapers and then putting the fire out. Spader was introduced with a much larger role as he plays Jade's older brother Keith who first introduces David to Jade and then starts to hate David for burning the house and puts the blame on him for his dad's death. The film was nominated an Oscar for it's theme song which has the same name but it was hated so badly and was nominated several Razzies; I'm failing to understand why. Endless Love gets a 9.9/10; It's not perfect but it's almost perfect.

ashish s (es) wrote: rare Indian flick with superb thriller touch 9/10 It's very common notion that we people at India can't make a movie with a gripping suspense that holds a person to the edge of the seat but this movie does proves all those wrong especially with being made some 40 odd yrs ago when making such movies was not considered sensible and was rare. Although with its time length of 3hr5min it seems bit too long , but its originality in script, screenplay and crunchy movements and good tracks make up for its long time length . The story is not about creating an identity of a man who is not there in actual , its more than that with so many people being a part of the gang disguising Dev anand. its mystery story telling at its best with all elements of thriller being involved . its not only the script but the acting of ashok kumar and that of female leads especially vaijyanti Mala make it must watch classic for any Hindi movie fan!!

Tyler K (fr) wrote: Thought it got better as the movie went on.

Johnny L (gb) wrote: Another classic. I'll probably see this 4 more times before my meters up.