Middle-aged Gerald Kingsland advertises in a London paper for a female companion to spend a year with him on a desert island. The young Lucy Irving takes a chance on contacting him and after a couple of meetings they decide to go ahead. Once on the island things prove a lot less idyllic than in the movies, and gradually it becomes clear that it is Lucy who has the desire and the strength to try and see the year through.

Middle-aged Gerald Kingsland advertises in a London paper for a female companion to spend a year with him on a desert island. The young Lucy Irving takes a chance on contacting him and ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Castaway torrent reviews

David M (gb) wrote: What a great homage to the Clint Eastwood spaghetti westerns of old. Really well-done all the way around. With such interesting characters and dark humor, I predict this will eventually become a true cult classic. Definitely a film to see!!

Ethan H (us) wrote: An informative documentary. Would be good to use as a resource for teaching history maybe.

Tyler P (jp) wrote: Excellent Van Damme!!!

Marina N (it) wrote: "Birthday Girl" turned out different than I expected. I was also positively surprised. The movie has its own style and is a good combo of romance, thriller and maybe even satire. Definetely something unusual. Kidman, Chaplin, and Cassel are convincing in their respective parts. It's not popcorn enterainment but something different, something that we also need sometimes.

Li W (de) wrote: It was funny, and had bad effects but it was a great fun movie. I liked all the spoofs.

Hina D (br) wrote: a very very very very good and funny movie !

Edith N (gb) wrote: Finding Your Own Voice I really don't get all the people who claim that the similarities to Carole King's life are all that compelling. I mean, there are a few; certainly, Carole King was one of the most notable female songwriters of the era we're examining here, and it's certainly true that she is a great singer as well. It's also true that there really wasn't a place for a female singer-songwriter through most of the time she was productive. However, very few of the details of the character in the movie line up with King's biography for large amounts of the film. The framing device fits, but the second act is the life story of someone completely different, if it's the life story of anyone real at all. Given the evidence, I don't think it can be. We start with Carole King and proceed to examine large amounts of the music industry of the sixties. And even at the start, there are some pretty prominent differences. Where we start is with Edna Buxton (Illeanna Douglas), a steel heiress. She is competing in a talent show, the prize of which is a recording contract. Only it's a bit of a scam, and there is no recording contract after all. Still, she goes to New York and tries to make a career of it. However, there's no market for what she does anymore. A record producer (Richard Schiff) agrees to take her demo and shop it around, and it comes to the attention of Joel Milner (John Turturro). He can't sell Edna as a singer, but he knows that her songs can be hits. He changes her name to Denise Waverly and lines groups up to sing her songs, and indeed, the songs become hits. Eventually, she starts working with Howard Cazasatt (Eric Stoltz). They start sleeping together, and when she gets pregnant, they get married. When she discovers him in bed with someone else, they get divorced. She meets Jay Phillips (Matt Dillon), a kind of a Brian Wilson analogue, and suffers through everything that implies. Unfortunately, there's so much music to this that the soundtrack album only features about half of it. It also seems to be out of print and therefore more expensive than I can afford these days. However, it is a good soundtrack. Elvis Costello and Burt Bacharach worked together on a couple of the songs, leading to an album and the only good part of the second Austin Powers movie. Some of the people who wrote songs for the soundtrack are connected to the era, including being people whose lives are borrowed for bits of the story. Carole King isn't one of them, though her ex-husband and daughter are, as is Joni Mitchell. I don't know who wrote the quasi-Brian Wilson music, but it's pretty well lined up with what he was doing in 1967. To be honest, I wouldn't even mind owning the album released at the end of the movie, which is supposedly a parallel to [i]Tapestry[/i], an album I already own and have for years. This is another one of those movies where it's important that the heroine isn't movie star-pretty. She's not unattractive, but she's relatively plain and knows it. Oh, she can still be hurt when Howard puts it in such blunt terms. Just because you know your relative level of attraction doesn't mean you need to be told, especially when you're pregnant. The scene wouldn't have worked if the actress had been astonishingly beautiful. Or even moderately pretty. She had to be plain enough to legitimately worry about her looks. Yes, I know that plenty of attractive women have low self esteem, but it's still aggravating to a lot of women to see someone who looks like Julia Roberts agonizing about her appearance. I'm not calling Illeanna Douglas ugly by any stretch, but she isn't what we think of as conventionally attractive, and she is being told that the man who's been sleeping with her for some time that he had always expected that he would marry a blonde bombshell. Once again, I have no idea how this movie ended up in my queue. I'm glad it did; it's certainly better than most of the other movies I've been watching lately. But it's a thing that comes up every once in a while. I can see reading a plot summary of this and thinking, "Wow, that sounds kind of neat." And it's true that it has Eric Stoltz, of whom I am extremely fond. However, it's enough to make me start thinking about writing a list of why I put things on my Netflix queue when I add them. Sometimes, I end up extremely fond of the movie, occasionally even to the point of adding them to my Amazon wishlist. Sometimes, I'm just glad to have seen them the once. Often, they are terrible and I don't have any idea why I wasted my time with them. This one, I'm glad I saw the once, and I've added the soundtrack to my Amazon wishlist. That's not a glowing recommendation, I admit, but it is, as I said, considerably better than a lot of the other movies I've seen for no reason that I can remember.

Paul D (au) wrote: Hard-hitting account of the social welfare system, although Crissy Rock's performance makes it so.

Benjamin N (ru) wrote: Nicholson's performance is more than worth while.

oliver m (fr) wrote: simply a masterpiece! it was a deeply moving experience... still is!

Sam D (es) wrote: This may be my least favorite movie of the original trilogy but this is still a really great movie

Paul D (gb) wrote: Sydney Pollack's second film as a director and the first of many with Robert Redford. He along with Natalie Wood are fine choices for romantic leads and pull of the love affair story with just the right amount of gritty emotion. Charles Bronson as the romantic foil was probably not the best choice though.

Citien P (jp) wrote: A blunt and brutally honest case study of the human condition. Therefore Bergman uses his close-ups like magnifying glasses. Also trademark of his later films. All in all, a visually bizarre and deeply fascinating film.

Gregory W (ag) wrote: awesome comedy showcase

Alexander P (nl) wrote: Alright but there were a lot of scenes that were very unrealistic like people just about to die and they don't. But there was about one good laugh in there but it was shown in the trailer. I know it's not a comedy. I would say yeah if it was on TV I would watch it.