Chinna Veedu

Chinna Veedu

Chinna Veedu (English: Mistress) is a 1985 Tamil film சின்ன வீடு written and directed by K. Bhagyaraj.[1][2] This film was Commercially Successful. The movie is the debut in Tamil for lead female Kalpana who is also sister of actress Urvashi who made her debut with K. Bhagyaraj in 1983 Mundhanai Mudichu film.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:0 minutes
  • Release:1985
  • Language:Tamil
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:Chinna Veedu 1985 full movies, Chinna Veedu torrents movie

Chinna Veedu (English: Mistress) is a 1985 Tamil film சின்ன வீடு written and directed by K. Bhagyaraj.[1][2] This film was Commercially Successful. The movie is the debut in Tamil for lead female Kalpana who is also sister of actress Urvashi who made her debut with K. Bhagyaraj in 1983 Mundhanai Mudichu film. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Chinna Veedu torrent reviews

Lee M (ru) wrote: Carrying the movie, though, is Barry Bostwick in the titular role, giving perhaps more effort than the material deserves while delivering a pitch-perfect comedic performance that will leave a smile on your face even if you're not sure what the heck is going on.

Henry B (ag) wrote: Good Film. Lots of laughs. Could be paced a little quicker but great acting, plot, comedy and general film!

Anne C (us) wrote: as a bona-fide trans woman, this movie really offends me and i hate it

Tatiana S (ag) wrote: Um anime que me impressionou e conquistou! Linda histria! Romance e uma pitada de comdia!!! Uma obra prima atual! No a toa que ganhou muitos prmios!

FilmGrinder S (ag) wrote: 76% "Just because I'm a racist, doesn't mean I'm not sensitive."-Ned (Jeremy Renner)

Christopher L (ag) wrote: Far better than it has any reason to be.

Ryan W (mx) wrote: Underrated film that is far more scarier than the original. I enjoyed this directors work better than the original because it wasn't so self satisfying in which Spielberg took away from the original film. The sequel is more original and although the special effects are somewhat cheesy, it is a more enjoyable interesting film than the original.

Chris G (it) wrote: Crimes of Passion is Ken Russell's 1984 erotic thriller about a fashion designer (Kathleen Turner) who moonlights as hooker China Blue by night. Along the way she is followed and lusted for by a man (John Loughlin) keeping tabs on her and a crazy street preacher (Anthony Perkins) hellbent on "saving" her.Ken Russell's films are all over the top sights for the eyes and the redlight district that China Blue frequents is a great set piece. Kathleen Turner is great as the super erotic China Blue, playing whatever game her john wants to play. The main problem with the film is John Loughlin's character. I don't know if it's the writing or his acting but the entire plot point dealing with him is so mind numbingly dull and stupid he ruins the picture. An ugly performance from Loughlin.It's Anthony Perkins that salvages the film. His over the top portrayal of the porno obsessed street preacher is a testament to his acting ability. Psycho may have been his greatest role but Crimes of Passion has to be second. He plays the role with such force and drive that it gets to you. He is that damn good in the role. Anthony Perkins made up for Loughlin's terrible performance. Crime of Passion is another one of those '80's erotic thrillers ala Body Double and Fatal Attraction, though this film is very explicit in its sex scenes. A product of it's time, the acting of two out of the three leads makes this a film worth give a view.

Scott A (fr) wrote: Despite Eastwood, this is well told and a great looking western.I guess they were going for the Anti-Hero approach with Eastwood as the town savior, but when he goes to rape a woman just because, or he kills the local townspeople and/or starts using them, it just felt like I was meant to cheer for a total dick. And in the end, why did he let so many of the town's people get mowed down before he even did anything?I actually really liked Geoffrey Lewis as the villain.The gun shoot outs were pretty good, but I still never understood why they literally painted the town red...or how they humanly did that in the small time frame.I think had Eastwood been more caring this movie would've been closer to the 5 stars.

Tonya V (ca) wrote: A little bit too long and a little bit predictable but still not a bad movie overall. Oded Fehr not in Mummy movies is nice!

Scott S (es) wrote: Poor man's (insert popular High School movie) but entertaining.

Thomas S (it) wrote: Man this movie is just so funny everything in this movie is good but the some of the affect are bad if you look at them right now but still bill mury still has the best line this man has no