Confessions of an Economic Hitman (2007) torrents full movies

#

Confessions of an Economic Hitman

In front of an angry audience somewhere in Latin America, a North American discloses the secret network that used the World Bank, payoffs, extortion and sex, military coups and political ...

Confessions of an Economic Hitman is a funny movie of Stelios Kouloglou. This movie was introduced in 2007. We can counted many actors in this movies torrent, such as John Perkins. Movie' genres are Thriller. The rating is 7.9 in www.imdb.com. We have a good movies torrent. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 90 minutes. FapDe is interesting uploader, he is very lovely. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Crazy', so what is your opinion. Do you know what are customers? Maria Ozawa is the best. I can't fight my iPad screen. Share this movies torrent to support us . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

. . In front of an angry audience somewhere in Latin America, a North American discloses the secret network that used the World Bank, payoffs, extortion and sex, military coups and political

Confessions of an Economic Hitman torrents

Confessions of an Economic Hitman full movie

Confessions of an Economic Hitman2007 torrent

Confessions of an Economic Hitman torrent, Confessions of an Economic Hitman movie torrents, download Confessions of an Economic Hitman full movie, Confessions of an Economic Hitman2007 torrents, download Confessions of an Economic Hitman2007 torrents, watch Confessions of an Economic Hitman movie, Confessions of an Economic Hitman englishsub, free download Confessions of an Economic Hitman movie, movie Confessions of an Economic Hitman torrent

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Apology Of An Economic Hitman 2008 XviD-Ouzo - NoRar - GCJMOther3428695.79 MB
Download   Apology.Of.An.Economic.Hitman.2008.READNFO.DVDRiP.XviD-OuzoDVDRip2833700.5 MB

You may also like


Users reviews


Ashley H (mx)

How the West Was Won is a must see. I enjoyed watching this motion picture because of the action and adventure. Henry Hathaway, John Ford, and George Marshall did great jobs directing this movie. The script is well written. James Stewart, Henry Fonda, and Gregory Peck give amazing performances. It is about a family saga covering several decades of Westward expansion in the nineteenth century. How the West Was Won is an excellent film


Eric H (nl)

For 1920, it was quite the accomplishment. However, for people not accustomed to and appreciative of the silents, it's probably one to hold off on--as you may be too quick to dismiss it because of the preachy plot and one-dimensional characters. They will enjoy it considerably. This is an important film but one that I would recommend mostly to people who already love silents. I loved this film


Eric R (kr)

Can they keep it up in "Bloodlust: Subspecies III"? Well it's the second of back-to-back sequels so I'll let you draw your own conclusions. Overall this is a very satisfying sequel and one of the overall strongest films that the Full Moon factory pumped out in its early heyday. Though it may be weaker in some angles (dialogue), but director Ted Nicolaou makes up for it in other aspects (pacing). Despite its obvious low budget short comings, "Subspecies II", compared to the original, is one of the more stronger sequels I've seen as it matches the original in every aspect. Yes this character is a wee silly but her dysfunctional relationship with her son does provide for a few unintentional laughs. The new character that takes the blood pie is Mummy, Radu's hideous mother. the horror!) and her preverbal love interest Kevin Spirtas, who looks like he just walked off the set of a soap opera. . . A plethora of new characters are added into the "Subspecies" universe (perhaps 'universe' is too grandiose a term to describe such a silly low budget franchise) including but not limited to a our 'heroines' professor (where was he in the first film?), her sister (played by William Shatner's daughter. Seriously there's enough continuity errors here to make one's head explode. The bloodstone itself has also gotten a complete makeover, though it does look far lavish than the cracker jack toy of the original film. Not only is our character of Michelle act completely different, she now has LONG hair even though the film takes place within mere moments of the original. The continuity as expected is complete bullcrap. Seriously Radu ends up being more of a main character than our 'heroin', if she would qualify as that. Her character also ends up being reactionary protagonist as she does nothing to move the plot along herself, only reacting to actions on the screen created by the antagonist character of Radu. Here the character is just a needy, emotional mess that spends most of the film sobbing and crying. Her character in the first film (played by Laura Tate) was a strong, determined women. The main problem for me is the main character of Michelle as she is far more wishy-washy. Nicolaou's use of shadows are also admirable and makes the film captivating from a technical standpoint. Director Ted Nicolaou does have a keen eye for style as the film has a nice polished look about it despite being made for the direct-to-video department. One aspect that the film fares worse in is the dialogue department as it is far more hokey and silly. This surprised the shit out of me considering this was shot congruently with "Subspecies III" and with a single plotline expanding two films I expected far more padding. This sequel outdoes it's guilty pleasure predecessor in the plot department as the pacing is much quicker. Before he can kill the newly transformed Michelle, the sun rises so she awakes, steals the 'bloodstone' (which looks completely different) so know he must chase our virginal vampire down with the aid of his mummified hag mother. Radu begins with killing his metrosexual brother in whilst sleeping(which means they couldn't get the actor back so they conveniently kill him off). Picking up right after the first film ended, we open with our ghoulish vampire Radu (Anders Hove returning) being resurrected by our pointless mini demons known as the subspecies (that somehow serve as the title of the series). "Subspecies II" not only ends up being one of Full Moon's better sequels, but it actually matches the original with its low budget vampire sucking goodness. However I do have to hand it to Full Moon as they did craft some pretty entertaining sequels with this process (sans "Trancers 4" & "5") that actually puts high budget studios to shame that also practice this back-to-back sequel making technique (cough, cough "Matrix" and "Pirates of the Caribbean"). "Subspecies II" was part of an experiment Full Moon Entertainment conducted in which they made back-to-back sequels to their most successful franchises ("Subspecies", "Puppet Master" and "Trancers") and I've stated in other reviews that I DESPISE when production companies take this route


Jeff B (us)

Decent psychological horror with a couple cool scenes


Joshua H (fr)

Great movie and information!


Maciek b (br)

ecommended!. It's fresh, intelligent, visually beautiful. I don't know when, Man of Iron probably. . . FINALLY, because what we have here is Andrzej Wajda in great shape for the first time since. So Tatarak finally appeared on Flixter (2 months after release)


Mehhdd M (gb)

eally unfortunate. . . The director has alot of misstakes. Sucks really poor quality


Private U (ag)

os actores cumplen con el alto rol que deban cumplir y De mas esta decirlo de Anton Corbjin. La pelcula que esta banda se mereca


Rangan R (au)

10. An average comedy, but a good time pass film. And again, don't take it seriously, even some of the jokes are too ordinary, but tried its best. It is not easy to suggest this film for everybody, but if you're looking for a comedy, some comedy, it will work okay. So not everyone who watches it would end up happily. It might have effected good way, if I had watched when it came out. Being a comedy, it has not delivered anything big. How it all develops and ends was the remaining story. So it is like his second and probably final chance to express his feeling. When he visits his hometown, all the old memories comes back to the life, particularly after seeing his old close friend who he had a crush on her, but never revealed it. Being a geek in the high school, how he transformed into a handsome man is the film. Maybe it is a chick film, or close to that category, but the perspective of the story was from a man. Ryan Reynolds with those dual getups was not bad either and Anna Faris was excellent in the comedy parts. All the actors were decent, particularly Amy Smart was much preferred actress than what she's now. Clearly we know how the story begins and ends, but we're only going to see the middle parts, how they developed it, especially the comedies. It was just for fun, other than that there's nothing to expect from it. I'm obviously talking about Ryan Reynolds. You can't believe this guy did a film like this back then. This kind of themes is very much done for the current era, particularly in Hollywood. I'm reviewing a decade old film. The comedy about a second chance


Richard P (kr)

Arguably the most gripping movie on civil war ever made