Congkak

Congkak

Kazman is a dedicated husband who, despite his wife Sufiah's protests, decided to buy a bungalow for their family near a lake as a family getaway. Anxious in the new house, Sufiah feels as if someone is watching her. Her daughter Lisa, who would always go downstairs at night to play congkak with someone whom she could only see, compounds her uneasiness. Sufiah throws the congkak in the lake, but is awakened the next night by the sound of the congkak being played again and upon investigation, she sees an old lady playing it. When her daughter disappears, the oldest resident in that area, Pak Tua, comes to the family's rescue and helps in locating the missing family members.

. You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Congkak torrent reviews

Federica B (nl) wrote: While this film exhibits simple animation, the soundtrack and voice acting is spot on and the movie is very well written.While it has some language and a couple risqu scenes (RED XD) it is an entertaining film and while the storyline is strange, it's expressed very well and you can still follow it if you haven't seen the series.The narration is cheesey, but again very entertaining.A fun rewatch to catch all of the eastereggs in the backgroundLike crookygrins plane. (Look really close at the nose of the plane XD)5/5 would reccomend

Umair U (us) wrote: A very different story. Keeps the interest factor intact.

LARRY C (ag) wrote: Very Good, I liked it in the early 1990's but knot as much now.

Sharon O (kr) wrote: some good singing and catchy lyrics, and barbie is a good role model for little ones. some interesting animation - some a bit 'unfinished' and disconnected.

Danny M (de) wrote: This film was great. I didn't think I would like it as much as I did. Considering it all takes place in one area this is really entertaining

Brock E (ag) wrote: Decent but extremely cheesy action flick.

Colin S (es) wrote: true story based on the innoccent Derek Bentley portraited by the excellent Christopher Eccleston...death sentence??? yes or No???? Medak has directed a masterpiece with excellent acting...a kick in the teeth for justice...

Ben D (jp) wrote: heard it was awesome

Alexander M (ru) wrote: As you could see from the trailer that movie is the sh*t . Lil D.B. is the Firestarter. Love a Good ol, prophet would say God is Good.

Julie H (us) wrote: the kind of film you want to watch again and again

Liams M (de) wrote: Love this freaking movie so much suggest u watch it before the new one. the script story line Plot everything is just amazing.

Anna Q (mx) wrote: The best part about this movie was when Frances and I turned to each in the movie theatre and whispered excitedly, "They're gonna FIGHT!"

Phillip B (es) wrote: What can I say, curiosity got the better of me, I like Stallone and I'm a completest, I like to watch the epicly 'not even in a fun way' bad movies as a red badge of courage....take your pick. This takes what would better fit a sketch comedy routine and stretches it into a not even 90 minute film. A city cop's overbearing mother comes into town and then HI-JINKS. However, even for how grating it can be I did laugh two or three times and at the end of the day I'd rather watch this then any sophomoric comedies, or god-awful parodies coming out today. So Good Job Movie! You aren't Scary Movie 5.

Thomas D (nl) wrote: Looking at Underworld Evolution as a mindless action adventure, it's not all that bad. It doesn't take itself too seriously, there are some well-directed action sequences, and the characters are far more realized than they were the first time around.Let's just be honest, the first Underworld is garbage. There's no two ways about it. The dialogue is horrible, the performances are over the top, and the visual effects are dated. But with the three years in between the first and the second, something must have clicked within the writer's room. Evolution is about 30 minutes shorter and much less convoluted than the first entry. When there are exposition-heavy scenes, they add to the story, instead of making things more confusing. I've already spent a couple hours with Selene & company, so I was prepared with the lore and character history. Plus, wasn't it nice getting Kraven out of the way early on in the film? Horrible character.Len Wiseman isn't the most talented director in Hollywood, or the smartest (considering he wants to make a Die Hard prequel), but I think he knows what people want out of these movies. Kate Beckinsale and some cool vampire-werewolf action are the primary reason these movies make money. While the main villains are set up nicely through flashbacks in the opening scene, they end up having little differences to Bill Nighy's first film villain.Part of the appeal of this particular Underworld entry is that it's in many ways, a fantasy-horror-western. Sure, it doesn't take place in the wild west, but the way the story is set up is very much similar to that of typical westerns. Selene and Michael spend the entire film on the run and in search of a mystical artifact linked to the past of their species. At the same time, this film suffers from the same problems as most vampire flicks do, the untouchable nature of vampires contributes to a less visceral experience if you know they will ultimately survive whenever they die. In all, it's hard to think I would ever watch this film again, but it's entertaining enough for me to give it a positive review.+Solid action+Characters are more realized+Western-Villains are weak-So.. are they untouchable?6.0/10