The year is 1998, six years after the nuke wars reduced the world to rubble and a few bands of wandering survivors. One of these groups stumbles into an abandoned government research facility, where they were working on making the body capable of creating its own amino acids, thus obviating the need for food. They are then attacked by one of the leftover experiments and begin experiencing an attrition problem.

A group of survivors try to avoid the battles of World War III, when they try to escape to the quiet lands, they encounter something much more deadly. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Creepozoids torrent reviews

Riff J (fr) wrote: Not scary. A huge letdown given its predecessor, The Conjuring. A colossal waste bc it ends up being a stereotypical hollywood horror that tries to hard to appeal to the mainstream masses... hence its full of shoddy jump scare attempts & very little substance.

Harish A (fr) wrote: LOVE FAILURE is one of the best movie in sidharth's career, a simple cool going family oriented picture. Most heart touching and very close to the general characters in everyone's life.Totally its simply super.

Jesse O (us) wrote: A simple and effective thriller that's probably one of the easiest movies to watch that I've seen in a long time. The film barely scrapes 70 minutes in running time, so it's obvious that the film pretty much shoots out of the gate running as there is simply no time to waste for needless exposition. The film being so short, obviously, means there's not a lot of room for character development, making sure that the characters themselves aren't one-dimensional husks. But, surprisingly, it's not that this film had great characters, but they did about as well as they could have with the very obvious time limitations. I don't know but I, honestly, had a real fun time watching this movie. It's not like it's the best thriller I've ever seen, but it does offer a pretty good and entertaining little diversion. Acting is pretty good all around as well. I think the film could've been better if there was a little more time to develop the characters and the narrative. Everything comes and goes so quickly that it always seems like the you're playing catch-up with the film. It's not that it's hard to follow, it's not a complex film in the least, it's just that it's such a quick paced film that once you're finally digesting a certain plot point, the movie is already ahead of what you're processing in your mind. I did like JJ Feild's performance as the villain of this film. He's got this cold and calculated manner of speaking that definitely works very well for the character. It's not like his performance is completely unique to him, but it's still good and he makes for a good villain. Other than that, with the film being so short, there's really nothing else to really say about the film. At 70 minutes long, it's about as easy to watch as any film I've ever seen. This might not be everyone's cup of tea, but I enjoyed the film. It's just a fun thriller. It could've been better, it's honestly a bit rough around the edges, but it's entertaining for 70 minutes, so I can't complain much. I'd recommend it as a Netflix watch, nothing else.

Ann H (br) wrote: This was on cable the other night... I heard someone scream, "I'm going to cut off your nosey nose!" about eight times and went to see what was on television. It was, Blue Smoke, the most ridiculous, yet, unintentionally hilarious movie I have seen in quite some time! So, watch it or, "I'm gonna cut off your nosey nose!"

Sunshine C (au) wrote: Was a pretty good love story. I just don't see that someone would wait that long for love when they were jilted in the first place. I didn't really care for that point of the story.

Kenneth B (br) wrote: Very much a continuation of Bride of Chucky, this lacks the frequency of laughs and thrills of its predecessor but its not without charm.

Arun H (br) wrote: I do kind of see a pattern reminiscent of godfather, crime movies where the second became a prequel to the first and how things came to be BUT content wise you can't compare. I really enjoyed this film. it really absorbed me where I lost track of time in what feels like a long odyssey for the characters who are all too human. I know that people say that the third is weak but I still want to see how it ends. and what 3rd film isn't poor?

(it) wrote: This movie is awesome. It's not visually very nice like my kind of movies n that's why I took a half point off, but this is a great movie and recommended. It takes controversial issues and interesting point of view. It is also deep, not judgmental, and actually neutral of the Palestinian/Israeli, homo/straight thing, how the character view changed is very interesting to watch. I found similarities from this movie to "The Lives of Others", but this one is actually deeper with more layers of racism, politic, and sexuality orientation issue.

Mocha M (kr) wrote: very funny movie, especially if youre asain, cos youre more likely to get the humour.

Lilianetty l (es) wrote: Is not bad, but I liked a little the story-telling (not everything ugh). I know, is from 1985 and is full of gore and nudity. Yes kids, they do NOT sparkle, they burn, they get killed and decapitated! Sorry, but Dracula would be pissed if he dosn't return in this 21 century and returns the old traditions created by us, crazy humans hehe.Plot: D is a vampire hunter (his story is fantastic! While watching the movie I knew his secret), that has return to hunt Dracula but he dosn't kill anymore....or does he? Doris is also a vampire hunter but one night she will get the bite from the Dracu-man (love to call him like that lol) and finding herself the next day with D is her lucky day. Many secrets, many characters, one conclusion. Is up to you to know how it will end and if this secrets are meant to be secrets or told in the meantime. Stars? A few for the effort.Music: I skip the voice acting part because no matter the language or accent, is stil an enjoyable film. The score was beautiful and stunning, not awesome. Stars? Yeah, the musicians did a great job.To end this short review, 3 stars of 5. Enjoy and HASTA LA PROXIMA AMIGOS/AS! CHAO! BLESS YOU ALL!!!

Jukka H (mx) wrote: Monin paikoin tyls, ei kovin jnnittv ja loppuratkaisunsa osalta todella eplooginen, mutta nostalgia-arvoilla pitklle silti psev pieni kauhuelokuva.

James C (es) wrote: A proper Ray Harryhausen classic.

Anthony I (us) wrote: The greatest Chaplin film ever? I'd say so. Lets face it, who could deny mustering a single laugh out of Chaplin's antics?

Matthew H (br) wrote: Nim's Island is engaging for the most part, and the story isn't half bad. The execution is about right, and the movie almost lives up to its full potential.