Debord’s eighteen-minute Critique of Separation directs its experimental attentions to “the documentary.” Debord draws from a catalogue of newsreel footage and book covers, rephotographed photographs, views of Paris and its neighborhoods, and a catalogue of disabused, seemingly offhand footage of him and his friends in the porous zone comprising the cafe and the street. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
|Download||Guy Debord - Critique de la séparation (1961)||Other||27||46||313.82 MB|
You may also like
Critique de la séparation torrent reviews
bill b (br) wrote: It has potential... but still.. nothing new here...
khianna r (us) wrote: omg this movie is the greatest movie of all time
Paul B (kr) wrote: Avoid this movie like the plague, absolute rubbish. It could have been so much better but the evil redneck fisherman are terrible, walking about taking jibberish to themselves. I switched it off at 60 minutes, surprised I got that far on to be honest.
WS W (ca) wrote: Stuart Townsend's directorial debut (& the one & only, by far). A multi-plotlines blending story in the same backdrop, like < Crash >. Some scenes are particularly well planned & filmed; there are so many places seem to be under developed at the same time however.
Caleb M (au) wrote: Successfully satirizes both sides of the abortion debate (at least circa 1996). Still conflicted about the ending (though I love how both sides end up fighting over literally no one), but this is a film that needs to be seen and discussed more.
Kendra H (kr) wrote: So funny and sad all at the same time. Absolutely loved it.
Kevin R (it) wrote: Terror is a very expensive game Jay Killon is a senior bodyguard that has been periodically assigned to guard the president during his illustrious career; however, when a new president is elected, and the first lady is a feisty spontaneous client, he finds his job more challenging than usual. Things are further complicated when it becomes apparent someone is trying to assassinate the first lady. "Are you trying to nail the iceberg?" Peter Hunt, director of Shout at the Devil, Wild Geese II, Death Hunt, and Eyes of a Whiteness, delivers Assassination. The storyline for this movie is fairly straightforward and interesting, primarily due to the concept of the first lady behaving in such a fashion. The action scenes are over the top but fairly good and the cast delivers their performances well. The cast includes Charles Bronson, Jill Ireland, Stephen Elliott, and Jan Gan Boyd. "Charlie, why don't you move in with me permanently? "I don't want to die from a terminal orgasm." We have been on Charles Bronson run lately and this film grabbed our attention because it was directed by Peter Hunt. Hunt and Bronson worked together on Death Hunt, which we thoroughly enjoyed. This picture is not as good as Death Hunt but it is interesting. It felt a little like Commando mixed with The Bodyguard. This is worth watching if you're a fan of 80s feeling action pictures. "Are those pants coming on or going off?" Grade: C
Gareth D (de) wrote: The trouble is, the scientist characters don't talk like clever people. They can't sell me as anything other than actors in a project. Not a patch on the Tarkovsky original. A million miles from the genius it requires to be a fair comparison. Too much male bottom also. Doesn't help.
Amber L (au) wrote: Bette Davis is excellent here... All the twist and turns had me on the edge of my seat!
Jake M (es) wrote: This movie is awful! The characters are not interesting, the musical numbers make no sense, and it has more endings than Return of the King! There are way better chick flicks to choose from just don't choose this one!
Chris M (gb) wrote: A successful Cuban salesman (Antonio Banderas) gets married to a woman (Angelina Jolie) from the United States who has many secrets about her dangerous past in the erotic drama, Original Sin. This is an unbelievably boring and poorly crafted picture that lost my interest right from the beginning. Michael Cristofer delivers neither an engaging screenplay nor decent direction that at least keeps the audience interested. I thought the editing was very sloppy and made the uninteresting plot not only worse but confusing. Even the people who want to see this picture for the sole purpose of its sexual content between Jolie and Banderas should look elsewhere.
David C (br) wrote: A funny dark comedy.
Joshua L (ag) wrote: The Movie is pretty bland but there are enough consistent laughs and crazy situations that made me enjoy it.