Dead Eyes of London

Dead Eyes of London

A disfigured killer with glazed-over white eyes is doing the dirty work so that an insurance agent-doctor can get the victims' insurance money.

Wealthy, heavily insured men are being murdered at an alarming rate. Scotland Yard investigates and finds clues that lead to a ring of blind men, led by a mysterious "reverend." . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Dead Eyes of London torrent reviews

Tanvir M (au) wrote: A rare sports biography done right from India, anchored by an astonishing performance from Farhan Akhter (the least of which is the amazing physical transformation he achieved solely for the film). There are attempts of myth making, but it all make for a rousing experience for more than 3 hours.

Navtesh A (ru) wrote: watched it yesterday .. i really did not imagine it to be so much good .. its a masterpiece as everyone is saying.

Kay L (au) wrote: There is nothing cute or fun about this movie, as it relies more on showing us the harsh realities of a drug induced life among struggling poor people who had no way out. The actors carried the film beautifully and Evan Ross was exceptional, breaking away from his usually childish and naive characters.While I find it to be an excellent piece, it's a film where you will either truly love it or find it ridiculous and absurd. There is no in between.

Simon D (it) wrote: this was pretty boring, I wouldn't recommend it.

Dov D (es) wrote: Oneof the most underrated horror films out there. Director Greg McLean utilizes true suspense in a way that hasn't been seen outside of eastern Asia in twenty years. The pacing is methodical and the climax pays off.

Mac D (nl) wrote: Dragons spitting ice, and farting fire, and a silly piece of garbage that should've been animated and called Dudley the Dragon Gone Wild. The first film was fantastic, had class, history, honor, etc... this has everything in the opposite. Do not see this movie.

Carla P (us) wrote: I stumbled upon this some time and was so pleasantly surprised. The story is moving without being self-consciously dramatic. Bouchez has always been lauded for this role but to me Reginier takes the cake as the pensive, introverted girl with an unfulfilled spirit.

PierreLuc G (ag) wrote: Lgrement mieux que le premier pisode. Un peu plus srieux tout en conservant une lgre touche d'humour. Les meurtres sont originaux et conviennent bien l'univers du principal antagoniste. Un peu lent dmarrer mais on se reprend bien dans la seconde moiti du film. Warwick Davis est toujours aussi convaincant.

Lowell H (de) wrote: A new Leopold and Loeb, must remember to rent. Loved Rope and Compulsion.

CloneCar G (us) wrote: Though you see that Reeves and Hackmann are trying and John Williams score is still great, Superman 4 is still one of the dumbest movies of all time.

Madel A (gb) wrote: No s puede hablar si excelente o si una buena pelcula, cuando se encuentra de por medio la vida y el derecho humano.

Jim B (gb) wrote: Recently watched during TMC's Oscar month...Jessica Lange-great performance in a depressing movie-and she looks good too...

Linda M (kr) wrote: While a B-rated movie for sure, I liked it. Especially the car and Sally Field.

Fong K (ag) wrote: viewed on 18/7/04 (Sun)They say Natural Born Killers is inspired by this 1967 movie. It does throw up a few gutsy surprises, considered made so long ago. Faye Dunaway walks around in the room with her upper back all bare. There is a scene suggesting oral sex. The final scene is rather painful to watch as Bonnie and Clyde are pigeonholed with, what the production notes state, 1,000 bullets. The film is not really that great. More like a shoot-'em-up made for mass audience. There is not enough depth to the characters and story. Natural Born Killers does a better job in exploring the psyche of outlaws.Sorry but I always marvel at how good the leading men and women look in these classics. Faye Dunaway is stunningly beautiful and she looked alot like Nicole Kidman. While Warren looked like Marlon Brandon and I am not surprised he drew inspiration from him. They were so good-looking and so good as actors, I keep thinking contemporary actors like Nicole Kidman, Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, Julia Roberts, Halle Berry etc will jolly 'live on' as screen legends and forever 'immortalised' in DVDs.Rating: B

Sam M (mx) wrote: Not as strong as Depp's obvious classics, but only he and Liotta's performance are to be cared for.

Joe G (it) wrote: Kevin Smith does it again! This film, as well as being really enjoyable to watch, makes you think about religion, what it is and what it could be. Would recomend

aaron w (mx) wrote: Mad Max is my favorite movie series. Although this isn't the best movie in the series it's still amazing. And made with only 300,000 dollars!!!!

Shreehari H (fr) wrote: At one point in George Miller's totally whacked out new film, a character proclaims: "Oh, what a day ... what a lovely day!"If you end up watching this film as I did, chances are your day will be anything but that.Mad Max: Fury Road is a totally underwhelming experience, a film that promised so much but ended up flattering to deceive.George, who also created the Mad Max Trilogy of the 80's with Mel Gibson in the titular role, goes for the jugular this time, delivering a film that's high on adrenalin but short on nuance.Plot, you ask? Immortan Joe is a dictator who presides over his subjects with an iron hand.Water, guzzoline (and common sense) are in short supply.It falls upon a rebel, Imperator Furiosa, and Max himself to liberate the country from the clutches of Joe's oppression.In fact, Furiosa (Charlize Theron in a stellar turn) is the heart and soul of this enterprise. She completely owns the screen each time she appears on it, lending a sense of urgency and gracefulness to the film's proceedings.Tom Hardy, on the other hand, is completely out of sorts. He lacks the charisma and easy charm that a leading role of this nature would inevitably demand.The whole film is basically one long explosion-filled chase down a barren, dystopian landscape that could give Panem from Hunger Games a run for its money.Problem is, the aforementioned chase takes all of two exruciating, mind-numbing hours.Miller's vision is grand and has a sweeping quality to it. The same cannot be said for his execution.A good film goes far beyond just expensive CGI and VFX. It requires a solid script, cracking dialogue and characters whom you can empathise with and relate to.In his zest for making a film that redefines the action genre, Miller unfortunately seems to have overlooked this elementary fact.I could have slept through the entirety of this film's duration and it would hardly have made a difference.In the film's very beginning, Max says, "My name is Max. My world is fire. And blood."And boring, he might have added. This Road is full of potholes.