Deilig er fjorden

Deilig er fjorden

I mange år har Terje Svahberg spart til hytte. Men så skjer det noe, brått og uventet. Han blir båtkåt. Og før noen egentlig vet ordet av det, har han foretatt seg transaksjoner som gjør ham til en stolt innehaver av en båt i luksusklassen...og alt som derav følger.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:102 minutes
  • Release:1985
  • Language:Norwegian
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:ocean,   boat,   water,  

I mange år har Terje Svahberg spart til hytte. Men så skjer det noe, brått og uventet. Han blir båtkåt. Og før noen egentlig vet ordet av det, har han foretatt seg transaksjoner som gjør ham til en stolt innehaver av en båt i luksusklassen...og alt som derav følger. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Deilig er fjorden torrent reviews

Jon T (au) wrote: Tedious, contrived alleged comedy populated entirely by loveable eccentrics and cardboard cut out villains. Consolation: like bad westerns, you can enjoy the scenery

Luckee C (ru) wrote: Golmaal 3 is an really hilarious and entertaining blockbuster, which has got to be the best Golmaal in the series. Watch it with your whole family... if you don't, you're missing out hundreds of laughs! Robusticaly Recommended! Verdict = Blockbuster

Jason M (us) wrote: To sum up this movie in one word: depressing.The movie was presented very well. I really could feel what each character was going through. Their life was torn down in a instant.I'll contradict a "critic" in saying that sometimes having each other isn't enough and I think this movie displayed that brilliantly. The sun doesn't always come out tomorrow for some.

Hank V (ca) wrote: In the first half of the movie, seeing Denzil Washington manipulate his way out of impossible dilemmas is intriguing to watch. But as he pulls his butt out of the fire over and over again, it becomes impossibly implausable. Nevertheless, there are enough unexpected twists thrown into the mix to make it a good movie, certainly worth watching. Detective suspense, with outstanding acting from Denzel Washington (of course.)

Eric J (ca) wrote: another old but funny movie

Steve W (fr) wrote: A very pleasing martial arts movie from Woo Ping Yuen. A young Jacky Wu plays Hok Man, son of a famous Tai Chi master who begins his adolescent adventures. Along the way, he learns from his parents, woos the girl, and faces off against dastardly a foreign villain and his bodyguards.I must say that this movie does everything right. When there aren't amazing choreographed fights, the characters are developed quite well. Hok Man has a very realistic and charming relationship with his overly strict father and easy going mother. A nice love triangle emerges in the middle, but they do not focus too much on that. By the time the final climax comes by, the characters are in their most vulnerable state of happiness and it ramps up the tension.As for the final fight scene, it is very reminiscent of "Once Upon a Time in China" (1991). The fight takes place in a warehouse, full of ladders and planks and all sorts of props used by the fighters. Seeing as Woo Ping Yuen also did the fight choreography for that film, it is fine.The final battle pits three villain versus three heroes, and they really take the time for each pair to fight and lets them breathe. They only cut to different fight when necessary, and it really flows well.A fine martial arts film that can be enjoyed by any martial arts lover.

Jesse O (it) wrote: Not as terrible a movie as I would've anticipated. Of course it's not as good as the first sequel, which actually ended up being pretty good. I've always thought that Pinhead, as a horror icon, and I've already written this in my review for the second film in this franchise, has always been treated far more seriously than the Freddys, Jasons or Michaels. I'm not saying that the sequels were better in quality than some of the sequels in any of the aforementioned franchises, but Pinhead is infinitely more effective as a horror villain than because he's treated as someone that people actually fear since he will pretty much bring about, I apologize for this terrible usage of the film's title in the review, hell on earth if he does get his way. Let's just get this out of the way from the get-go, the acting in this movie is, honestly, absolutely awful. It's not like Hellraiser 2 had Oscar-quality acting, but Hellraiser 2 is Breaking Bad to Hellraiser 3's the Twilight franchise. I'm obviously overstating the point, but the acting from everyone that isn't named Doug Bradley is horrendous. Doug Bradley himself is pretty great as always, I mean the character is pretty one-dimensional itself, but this film, at least, tries to incorporate some of backstory, involving who Pinhead was before he back the leader of the Cenobites. It's weird, because it's obvious that Pinhead is a pretty nefarious and evil individual, but Doug Bradley brings a certain elegance and class to the Pinhead character, it's the strangest thing. It's not even the fact that he's well-spoken and eloquent, it's all about Bradley's presence that makes the character work even if he's not as over-the-top or as goofy as Freddy Krueger. The character designs for some of the Cenobites, not all, is excellent. Some of them are a little goofy, to be fair, like the Cenobite with the camera sticking out of one eye is pretty goofy, as is the Cenobite that spits out CDs. I think those are the ones that I liked the least, the rest of them are really well done, in my opinion. The film, leading up to the climax, honestly, isn't anything special. I mean there's some B-movie qualities to the film, you can at least laugh at the shitty acting and some of the obvious audio flaws, like trying to fit in voice overs even though the lip syncing isn't up to par. Once the shit hits the fan and Pinhead, and the other Cenobites, make their way to earth then the film really picks up. Like there's some really strong visuals here. Like Pinhead doing the christ pose in a church in front of a window with cross on it while he says 'I am the way'. That scene is probably the best scene in the entire film, but it's the type of scene that the religious conservatives will be offended by. Then again, what reason would a religious conservative have to watch this film. But, as an atheist, I have no such qualms and I thought it was a pretty awesome visual that is bound to get a reaction. I thought that if the film had been as consistently good as the climax was, then it would've been a better film. The film has some real cool moments and some surprising backstory, but I don't think there's enough 'hell on earth', so to speak, to make the film good. Not to mention the acting is fairly atrocious. With that said, honestly, I thought this movie was perfectly fine. It's watchable but not necessarily mind-blowing. I'm sure that it's considerably better than some of the later sequels, though.

Mark L (ag) wrote: Yet another of the mid-80s teen romances, but this one is excellent for some reason or other. God knows. But it has fun, and believable romance, and all sorts. I recommend it to you, the fictitious person who reads these reviews.

Gerard D (us) wrote: Based upon Edward Bunker's writings, this is a fantastic gangstermovie, with a real tour-de-force performance by Dustin Hoffman, and starring a young and stunning Theresa Russell. A classic.

Leonard D (ru) wrote: This was just too depressing to watch!

Brian L (mx) wrote: It's like Almost Famous except Meat Loaf hits on Debbie Harry but she ends up leaving with a midget.. and then Meat Loaf is about to deflower a 16-year old groupie but is interrupted by a UFO... and it starts and ends in Texas. Plus Alice Cooper, Roy Orbison, AND Hank Jr..

Dennis C (ru) wrote: What is the hell is wrong with people these days?? 74% from the audience reviews? This movie was emotionless, long winded and indulgent. I envision a bunch of out of work actors and screenwriters waxing about the undertones and creative slow shot scenes with a lonely piano tune redundantly appearing from time to time. I had to watch to the end to see if there was going to be some clever ending that brought the slow drooling plot into an ah ha moment..... nope. It ended with the same indulgent pseudo artsy droning it started with. I was shocked to see that there would be any good reviews. I can understand the critics being positive since they like amateurish stuff like this that makes you seem smart for enduring but a paying audience???

Paul A (it) wrote: it was ok, the acting was good, but the sets weren't brilliant, the characters didn't look that great either except for pinocchio and princess fiona before she was an ogre. I think it would of been better with less music, and shreks accent was abit too off

Lauri L (de) wrote: Jlleen yksi loistoraina, jossa vahva kssri. Mys Annette Beningin parhaita roolisuorituksia. Ja tm on se parempi versio tarinasta.

James O (it) wrote: Firstly the acting is incredible. Anyone who values great acting should enjoy the film for that alone but... a big but... I may need a fair few days to get over how wrist slittingly depressing tis film is. It is just horrible, the whole thing. The setting, the storyline, the charachters, wow. It is powerfully downbeat, gritty, horrible greys everywhere. I count myself lucky I wasn't born on a Glasgow council estate, dam harsh life. Yeah, good film but too slow paced and just not what I want to watch.