Devil's Highway (2005) torrents full movies

#

Devil's Highway

While traveling through the cursed Old Highway 13 in New Mexico, each passenger of a bus to Las Vegas is attacked by an evil fiend that possesses and destroys their bodies.

Devil's Highway is a funny movie of Jennifer Farrell. The released year of this movie is 2005. You can check list actors in this movies torrent, for example Shane Brolly, Natassia Malthe, Robert Miano, Al Sapienza, Corbin Timbrook, Tim Kelly, Kacia Brady, Dayton Knoll, Natalie Alexander, Robert Ambrose, Wilmer Calderon, Matthew Hoffman, Jennifer Farrell, Nicolas Pajon, Rai Alexandra. There are many categories, such as Thriller. This movie was rated by 3.3 in www.imdb.com. We have a good movie to watch. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 91 minutes. DeGea is good uploader, she is very fast. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Excited', so what is your opinion. Do you know what are customers? Maria Ozawa is the best. I can't push my iPhone screen. Enjoy this movies torrent and share to your friends . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

While traveling through the cursed Old Highway 13 in New Mexico, each passenger of a bus to Las Vegas is attacked by an evil fiend that possesses and destroys their bodies

Devil's Highway torrents

Devil's Highway full movie

Devil's Highway2005 torrent

Devil's Highway torrent, Devil's Highway movie torrents, download Devil's Highway full movie, Devil's Highway2005 torrents, download Devil's Highway2005 torrents, watch Devil's Highway movie, Devil's Highway englishsub, free download Devil's Highway movie, movie Devil's Highway torrent

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Devils.Highway.2005.DVDRip.XviD-FiCODVDRip2750706.76 MB

You may also like


Users reviews


Arturo R (ag)

No hay conflicto en la historia que te mantenga atento y provoca demasiada hambre


Babak I (ru)

Looks like a very horrbile B-grade movie so I'm not going to waste my time watching it


Bryan K (br)

Shouldn't have made this one. The villainous gang of Mexican thugs are poor substitutes for Deebo, who like the rest of the original cast that found themselves in the sequel confined to their own solitary roles riding in the back of a dogcatcher truck. toys. . . The new neighborhood has none of the grit or charm that LA did in the original, Rather than relying on at least semi-believable episodes for comedy such as the neighbor across the street getting caught in bed with the pastor, there's pink-clad record store owners flashing guns and an uncle's bedroom full of. Losing Smokey as a character and leaving Craig to be the comedian does not work, with the supporting cast of new characters around Craig less amusing and more absurd. Though there's some stuff worth laughing at in this one, this sequel captures next to none of what made the original special


Daisy M (ca)

decent but unoriginal detective-kinda movie


Dillinger P (it)

Watch if you wanted to catch this but never got round to it, but there are plenty of other offerings out there that give something more accurate. It looks nice in places, and as short sequences the 3 all make for some entertaining pieces of drama, but by the end you can visabley see the seems just unbuckle before your very eyes. The ideas are yet again brilliant, controversial and meaningful to the world, not just the american people, but it still leans heavily on the good old USA side, meaning that we dont really get a sense of the opposing side, almost making this a one sided arguement, were it not for Meryl Steep and Andrew Garfield. Redford does well directing his actors, with powerful performances but when the string is so loose between them its hard to find weight behind it all. The week link are the soldiers, although their situation is on the surface, the most thrilling, it just lacks any real attention, acting like more of a tool to intercut between both meetings. Equally Robert Redford and Andrew Garfield both turn in extremely viable performances of student/teacher mentoring. Meryl Streep also does a fine job as a journalist, trying to be used to force propaganda against the people of America. The cast are all excellently chosen, Cruise plays the Senator as smug and arrogantly as you would expect him to, really playing to his strengths with his perfect smile, with serious undertones. The conclusion is a jumbled mix of excellent ideas and performances, with horrific gaps in pacing and very little feeling of relevancy between the meetings until the very end, by which point it feels more tacked on that anything else. It follows the meeting of tutor and student in a modern day society and it follows the horrifying predicament that 2 young American soldiers are put in and basically tries to tie them all into a nutshell, without being to controvesial, while at the same time trying to hit those marks. Lions for Lambs centers around 3 couplings, a PR free meeting between the Senator of the USA and an experienced journalist surrounding a new plan of action for the war on terror in Iraq. But then when making a film set during any current period, it really is hard to predict the future. Were I to watch this back in 2007 my consensus of this outing may have been dramatically opposite from now. With films like Lions for Lambs, its overall themes and tones, although relevant, come at a cost for lengevity


Jamie C (ru)

hitty ending ;). . Pretty good


Jane L (fr)

This film is legitimately terrifying


Miroslav G (mx)

No is a solid, respectable, and straightforward espionage thriller that started the beloved Bond series and is a must-see for any fan of the franchise. Overall, Dr. I can't really blame them for this, but due to it, the film can seem a bit lackluster at times. It seems that the producers had just chosen a more laidback and straightforward Bond novel to kick-start the series with due to budget constraints, making it easier both physically and financially for them so they could see if this series would really take off or not. And even though this film may have been extraordinary in its time, it's considered a bit slow by today's standards. No was surprisingly revolutionary for its time and moviegoers had never seen anything quite like it before, easily imprinting itself in memories of many. Also, Dr. But let's not forget: without this film, we wouldn't have the many great Bond films that have succeeded it. No is met with such high regard is because it started the series, making it's deeming of being one of the best in the series more obligatory than genuine. Only reason why Dr. I'll give this movie credit however for kick-starting the series, but there isn't really anything special about it. No, the very first James Bond film, is a solid little film despite the ridiculous amount of acclaim it has garnered. Dr. No. The film that started it all: Dr


Richard L (de)

I think I just don't get that kind of humor. In my opinion, this movie was not really funny save for a few jokes here and there


Spencer P (mx)

A wonderful piece of Australian cinema for fans of period pieces, this is beautiful writing and solid performances presenting a very respectable kind of romance, and shedding light on underprivileged individuals anywhere