"No Flower Without Rain" is the 3rd AKB48 documentary. The movie feature various moments of 2012, such as Maeda Atsuko's graduation, Sashihara Rino's transference to HKT48, Oshima Yuko's winning the 4th Senbatsu Election and the Tokyo Dome concert.
What is a documentary? What are our expectations and assumptions? Taking its cue from the 'city-symphony' genre, 'Documentary' voyeuristically explores the dominant concerns of documentary ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Documentary torrent reviews
(fr) wrote: This is a considerable improvement over Hatchet 2. I don't even know what it was that made this film so much better than its prequel, because, essentially, they're the same exact film with very little that's actually different. But, I don't know, I thought the film was better paced than Hatchet 2, the horror/gore was, obviously, very over-the-top and tongue-in-cheek. I wouldn't call this a parody of slasher films, but it does poke fun at some of the tropes. Like, for example, how a lot of these monsters keep coming back film after film, no matter how devastating an end they met in the previous film. The film plays with that here and it's actually probably one of the more important elements of the film, in how you actually get rid of Victor Crowley. While how they did end up getting rid of him might seem stupid, particularly considering everything that was done to him, it actually makes sense within the context of what the film is trying to do, so I had no problem with that. Maybe I'm overrating the film, but I honestly had quite a bit of fun watching this film. It's not what you would call a great horror movie, and it was never actually meant to be one. But as far as quick, doesn't overstay its welcome diversion, then it works pretty damn well to be honest. Another reason I think I'm overrating this film is the fact that Sid Haig made an awesome cameo appearance in this film. His appearance definitely made the film a little bit better to me and, without him, it's very likely that I'd have given the film 2.5 star rating. It's not that I didn't have fun, but Haig's appearance made the film better than it would've been without him. And it's not even a cameo that goes more than five minutes. With that said, I think I still would've enjoyed the film in a more B-movie type of way, even if I didn't give it a good rating. There's a lot of gore, duh, and it's obviously completely over-the-top, just what you would expect. The film is surprisingly well paced for this type of film. Like there's a good balance of gore and 'story'. Not that there's honestly much of a story to speak of, but it is there and they find a good balance between those two elements to make sure that the film doesn't peak early. So that was cool. The film, obviously, has its comedic elements and it's clear that this isn't meant to be taken seriously in the slightest. So I enjoyed this movie. It's got good gore and good tongue-in-cheek tone. Hatchet fans will definitely enjoy this one. It's a fun time.
(au) wrote: Not bad. Kind of random and strange... but since when are those bad things? Sweet, in its own way.
(au) wrote: Pari hienoa kohtausta oli, muuten aika kliseinen elokuva..
(ag) wrote: Beautiful! Would you rather go to Heaven or to Outer Space?
(au) wrote: Great movie! Light hearted, funny, good cast. The right balance of everything.
(it) wrote: How the hell Ralph Fiennes agreed to do this shit?
(ag) wrote: I love this movie. J'aurais voulu rencontrer Om Whalid !
(de) wrote: Philip Baker Hall is a bit of man crush of mine but this movie does him little justice.
(gb) wrote: Holy shit, another film with alot of faces who have come along way since '93. Found this flick in the cheapy bin and a delight to watch. One hell of a journey, if money could only talk, the things it could tell.
(nl) wrote: Far from Dangerfield's best work, but worth a watch.
(ag) wrote: It was pretty boring
(kr) wrote: Was a really interesting watch, heartbreaking in parts as well :(
(ca) wrote: A visceral examination in the deterioration of a raw and brutal man that is spectacularly acted and powerfully presented.
(mx) wrote: It was alright, not something I would watch again, though. It's quite slow.
(ag) wrote: Amazing visuals make this a spectacle to see.