Dot and Keeto

Dot and Keeto

Dot, an Australian girl, seeks the magical green root that will give her the ability to talk to animals. She eats a red root by mistake, and is shrunk to the size of an ant. With the help of her friends Keeto the mosquito and Butterwalk the caterpillar, she searches for the green root that will restore her size. But she must find it before sundown, or she will shrink even smaller.

The fantastic adventures of little redheaded Dot in the Australian bush. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Dot and Keeto torrent reviews

Pedro C (nl) wrote: I was looking forward to watch ???? ???? and it was such a great to surprise to find it among my flight's movie options. So it was funny... cool... hmm... hmm.. what?... :O... noooo...

Ricardo T (fr) wrote: There a good movie entertaining sad and humorous totally recommend it it's a good long story short I enjoyed it from the beginning all the way to the end.. *****

Ellie D (it) wrote: I watched this in class as a project an nearly cried. It showed me so much about bullying. It mad e me realise how common it is in the community.

Mira Mohd S (mx) wrote: Let's make one thing clear 1st, like most Bollywood sequels; this one too has no relation to its 2012 predecessor. Despite that it's hard not to consider this film as one of the anticipated films of the year, with director Sujoy Ghosh returning to helm the film as well as writing it, and of course acting power house Vidya Balan leading the film, along with a promise of yet another gripping thriller is something we all as an audience have been looking forward to. Although the film is a standalone sequel, for most parts, it can be considered a worthy successor, mainly due to its shared setting (West Bengal) and director Sujoy Ghosh's steely resolve to not let typical mainstream contrivances come in the way of stellar storytelling, which is both reassuring and commendable. What made the 1st film an absolute killer was that its entertaining, layered storytelling was followed by a disclosure through which we realized that nothing had been what it seemed through the film. While, this film too features many disturbing and mystifying individual elements and successfully delivers some shock treatment for viewers throughout the film. The expected suspense, unpredictability, and thriller elements are missing here. It certainly begins on a high note, initial few minutes keep you engaging, but then post interval the plot loosens up. Ultimately, post intermission, you realize that most things in the film were more or less what you thought they were when they first rolled by and the big reveal is just so-so. This isn't a story where one gets to predict or ponder, because for a large part of the film we know who the antagonists are, and what drives them. This thus stops one from experiencing the thrill of guessing and / or deducing, and instead makes us take sides and hope for an ending that justifies that action. Hence, even though it is predictable to an extent, it is also real and grounded at all times, largely due to some excellent production design by Subrata Barik and Kaushik Das. What is most admirable in the film is that director Sujoy Ghosh manages to keep the proceedings engaged with the help of Vidya Balan, who once again excels and proves her brilliance and spontaneity. The story follows Vidya Sinha (Vidya Balan), a doting single working parent of Mini (Tunisha Sharma), a paralyzed teenage girl confined to the wheel chair. Vidya is saving every penny possible so as to be able to take Mini to New York for her treatment as she is optimistic that Mini would be able to walk on her own after the treatment. But destiny has a different plan for her as Mini gets kidnapped and Vidya receives a call from the kidnappers to meet at an address. As she madly rushes to the said address, she meets with an accident and goes into coma. Charged as a hit and run, the case is assigned to Sub Inspector Inderjeet Singh (Arjun Rampal) who is surprised to see that Vidya, has an uncanny resemblance to a wanted criminal known as Durga Rani Singh, with whom Inder also shares a past. While investigating Inder comes across Vidya's diary which reveals where she has been all this years. What is the connection between Vidya and Durga Rani? How does Inder know Durga Rani? How is Vidya able to save her daughter? What was the motive of the kidnappers? This is the mystery. As expected, the narrative is absolutely rousing, nail biting and terrific in the first part. There isn't a second wasted in pulling the viewer into the drama. Director Sujoy Ghosh must be commended for his tight screenplay and for building up the thriller beautifully, and making sure the atmospherics throughout the film are pitch perfect, lending a note of authenticity to a screenplay that doesn't always make sense. The film also has a subtle touch on a social issue (child abuse) but does not preach about it and there lies the beauty. Vidya's lower middle-class existence, her torturous past, the dashing cop with a tenuous link to her - they all fit in perfectly with the tone, as the film moves swiftly from past to present, leaving no time for the audience to ponder the many inconsistencies in the narrative. Ignoring the convenient consequences of characters interrelated in this slice of 'scary' life tale; it is safe to say that the motives of each and every character, including the minor ones, are superbly drawn out. Like its predecessor, here too the places - Chandannagar, Kalimpong, and Kolkata, end up having identities of their own and almost seem like protagonists in their own right, thanks to sound designer Anirban Sengupta and cinematographer Tapan Basu, who are superb when it comes to turning places cold, menacing, maddening, and authentic, all at the same time, and in succession. Also, Ghosh's eye is just as keen as it was four years ago, as there's a wealth of visual detail scattered across the film; one of my favorite throwaway moments is when Inderjit chases a fake-passport supplier through his workplace and we catch a split-second glimpse of art forgeries stacked in a room. Clinton Cerejo's background score is dauntless in its effectiveness and acts as a catalyst to the duo's efforts. It is the relentless journey that glues the various elements of the story by Sujoy Ghosh and Suresh Nair together. Because, even though we know that not everything is what it seems, we are also inwardly hoping for things to go the way we expect them to. Unfortunately, the film's biggest letdown is the final moments. The pre-climax and climax portions lack what it takes for the film to become a gem of a thriller and it seems like the director is rushing to a clichd end. Also, the conflict drops flat towards the end of the second half and a lot of questions arise with the predictable, forced climax which lacks the bang. Ghosh, who seemed confident in his conceptualization till the final 20 minutes, is clearly aiming at a similar sock-the-viewer-in-the-neck impact as before, but comes up instead with an unimaginative, more or less predictable whimper. Maybe because, director Ghosh seems convinced that both his films constitute a franchise, and that he has to live up to the expectations of fans who'd be disappointed if the new film didn't have an assassin, two cops, and a moment of high drama that turned out to be visual deception. It's not that Ghosh doesn't have a fresh story to tell - some of the subplots in this film could sustain a whole feature by themselves. Still, by the time the (fairly shaky) denouement arrives, you can feel the narrative strain to top the earlier film's final reveal. Though this film has none of the memorable detailing of satellite characters that made the 1st film outstanding (like the awesome Bob Biswas) it is unobtrusively insightful in its own way. The long-term effects of sexual abuse, victim blaming, the politics in the police establishment and small-town life are all dealt with effectively. I really enjoyed the sweetness of the brief romance between Vidya/Durga and her beau Arun (Tota Roychoudhury), his kindness to her and his non-aggressive wooing. And there is a refreshing, believable normalcy in the relationship between Inderjeet and his wife Rashmi. While, the ending may not deliver the goods, but Viday Balan certainly does. The media has for years now discussed her willingness to take on the physical attributes of the various characters she plays. While that is no doubt a remarkable quality, to focus on that alone would be an injustice to this fine artist since physical quirks can be used as crutches by average actors too. Balan's strength is her ability to drown out her own personality for a role. Vidya certainly excels in the film; her deglamorised look suits the plot. Vidya Balan's characters keep you engaged wondering whether she is a victim or a perpetrator. Arjun Rampal is in top-form after a long time. He nails the part & enacts the cop, skillfully. He seems under control as far as his acting is concerned, thanks to a screenplay that ensures he is one of the most balanced characters of the film. The child actresses playing 'Minu', Naisha Khanna and Tunisha Sharma are adorable. In supporting roles, Jugal Hansraj, Tota Roy Chaudhury, Amba Sanyal, Manini Chadha and Kharaj Mukherjee are effective. On the whole, 'Kahaani 2' is worthy watch for its performances and screenplay despite a couple of major scripting flaws.

James P (fr) wrote: The low score this movie has as I'm writing it (33%) saddens me because this is not at all a bad movie. Part of the problem I think is that people are going into this movie with the wrong impression of what they're going to see. I thought I was about to watch a supernatural horror story filled with evil vengeful ghosts, and the prologue doesn't do much to change that notion. That's not what this movie is at all, though. What this movie is, however, is a character-driven coming-of-age piece, with a bit of ghost story added in for flavor. The movie is more haunting than haunted--it builds at a slow-burning, lingering pace, with the camera often letting the quiet atmosphere and the emotion of the moment speak for themselves. While I was never bored watching it, I can easily see how others might be, especially if they were looking forward to a completely different experience.

Dan B (jp) wrote: I've never cheered so hard for a documentary!

MANI (ru) wrote: Samira Makhmalbaf daughter of Iranian filmmaker Mohsen Makhmalbaf has proven her direction skills in BLACKBOARD. The movie is about Kurd refugee teachers who are seeking students around the border to educate them and can feed themselves in return. One of the teachers met a teenager group of smugglers who smuggles goods from Iraq to Iran. The other teacher met a group of old men who wants to get back to their land to be buried in the mud of their homeland. "Blackboards" shows a reality that everyone is powerless to change. Even these teachers can't make a dent. This is not a movie for just everyone. You must be able to handle the slow and different way of storytelling to appreciate this movie fully. The opening scene of the film shows ten new teachers setting out to catch students. Wooden blackboards strapped to their backs, they climb among the mountains, dodging bullets themselves. The movie depicts that the hunger and the insecurity of the people had left no room for education. The movie is good looking, with its never-ending, landscapes and good camera positions to tell the story with. Its filmed with handhold camera, with lots of long sequences It works good for a realism. The dialogue is realistic, though not always interesting. I mean they basically say the same things five times in a row in this movie, which perhaps is a bit irritating. This is also due to the non-professional actors that play in this movie But on the other hand it's the story that still makes this a pleasant movie to watch. The subject is a bit heavy and serious. Still the end result is a good and not heavy to watch movie that is absolutely worth seeing but lacking in real emotions or depth to make a true lasting impression.

Nolan M (au) wrote: Awesome music and dancing from its cast.

Robert M (nl) wrote: A direct sequel to Godzilla 1985. It takes a while to get going, but when it does, the goods are dished out in this somewhat poetic bash. Science should stop messing with Godzilla cells. When has it ever worked out guys.

Bryn C (it) wrote: Flirts between campy theatrics and Faustian finger-pointing. An exceptional performance from Klaus Brandauer: fun, kingly, pathetic and sincere.

Eddie A (au) wrote: Dawn of the Dead soundtrack, stock footage of African tribes and of slowing motion animals and good gore can't save this film. Acting and dialogue are sooo bad. It did make me laugh, it was so ridiculous.

Joshua C (kr) wrote: It was good. I'll never forget that harmonica jingle the rest of my life.

Stephanie F (mx) wrote: Entirely charming, and would probably be more so if it weren't really rather awful about witchcraft.

Steve P (jp) wrote: Invictus is an exciting and motivationally touching experience. You will find this movie to be breathtaking and inspiring. Whether or not you want a confidence booster or just simply want to see a good movie, Invictus is your film to watch. Starring Morgan Freeman as (Nelson Mandela) and Matt Damon as Francois Pienaar. The movie genre could be associated to other movies like Rudy, and Remember the Titans. Both of which endure conflicts involved within the realm of Football while Invictus has more to do with rugby, the conflict is similar but on a national stage. While the movie does star a rugby team in South Africa, it could be compared to other movies like The Butler, which is a movie about racial divisions within the United States during the 1960's. Invictus associates the racial issues that occurred within South Africa during the 1990's which subsequently brought the country together through its national rugby team. The movie is based off the events that occurred in South Africa when Nelson Mandela ran for president in 1993. The movie features a rugby team called the "Springboks." This team had received some scrutiny within its own country during the 1990's because the people felt like it only partially represented themselves. In the early 1990's Nelson Mandela was released from prison after 27 years. He was there because he stood up against the government in behalf of human rights. Following him leaving prison he ran for President of South Africa and won! Despite winning Mandela is left with a broken country that is utterly divided. In his attempts to bring the country together, he decided to unite the country through its national rugby team (Springboks). The movie ultimately took a turn when Mandela made a bold move by inviting Francois who was the rugby team captain into his office. Mandela admonished Francois about his plans to utilize the rugby team as a racial instrument to unite the country of Africa. At the time the rugby team had been suffering many losses. Francois took this challenge to heart and saw the vision of Mandela and ran with it. After many attempts to unite this team, they did end up winning many games and ended up making it to the world cup! These inspiring events leading up to that moment where the springboks united the country will surely shed a tear or two.The beauty of this story is brought together in love as an entire country finds themselves completely united as they watch their team play in this tremendous journey of unification. Although, the outcome of this movie is obvious, it will both touch and move all those who seek to be inspired.

Graham J (fr) wrote: With this collection of shorts Jarmusch still has done no wrong. I especially love the first sequence with Gena Rowlands and Winona Ryder as well as the sequence with Giancarlo Esposito and Rosie Perez.

Jared H (br) wrote: great graphics actors. excellent. kept me intrigued

Gregory W (gb) wrote: good stuff kinda noirish though though 20th century markets as such I kinda disagree.