Down to You

Down to You

College coeds in New York City, Al, the son of a celebrity chef, and Imogen, a talented artist, become smitten the second they lay eyes on one another at a bar. However, the road to happiness is not a smooth one. Outside forces, including a predatory porn star who wants to lure Al into her bed, threaten to pull apart the young lovers before their romance has a chance to really flourish.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:91 minutes
  • Release:2000
  • Language:English,French
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:artist,   student,   ring,  

A young man wins and loses the first serious love of his life. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Down to You torrent reviews

Colin D (es) wrote: Lifeless and boring sequel to the original classic Christmas comedy

Lee M (ca) wrote: A lark, but it's a serious-minded lark, addressing issues of class and culture, the haves and have-nots.

Corei T (au) wrote: This was better than I thought it would be... Check it out on Netflix.

Madison O (nl) wrote: I love the movie and I thought it was great!!;)

Brody M (us) wrote: Definitely not as good as I was hoping but it still had its moments

Kevin Michael G (ag) wrote: Cute. Nice ending. Learned three words: moan, cunt and GEEZ!

Dorian G (es) wrote: Not great, but kinda better than I had remembered from way back when. Phillip Seymour Hoffman was very funny.Watched on Netflix with Sam at her place, March 10, 2016.

Aaron C (au) wrote: charming theatrical acting from bening, irons and gambon (dumbledore). it examines the fuzzy definitions of love, commitment, and dramatic comedy on stage (and who was it who said "the world's a stage, and each must play a part"? shakespeare perhaps, but elvis crooned it better -- and in this movie, bening plays it with passion)

Tristan M (fr) wrote: Boring, uninteresting and slow. Not only that but the characters were very dull, undeveloped and the acting wasn't much good. Those are the biggest problems with this film, but overall it dosent have much going for it. The plot wasn't new and didn't hold much excitement, there was a brief car chase and fistfight but otherwise there was no action. The title is misleading, it sounds like a action gang type movie but isn't. The blood part of the title works, the wine part dosen't make much sense to me at all. I can't say I have anything really positive to say about it, it didn't fail in every aspect, but it did below average in all them.

Maribell M (ca) wrote: I love this movie...Its so fucking funny!!!!

Austen V (mx) wrote: Yes! Yes! I'm a sailor. (Bursts out laughing crazily)The movie was alright

Norbert P (ru) wrote: The actors brought the movie.

Matthew D (jp) wrote: The trouble with Hitchcock is that when he tries to do pure comedy it feels so forced, not at all like many of his best thrillers, which have some great natural comedy that emerge organically from the situation or from the witty personality of a character. No such luck here and so we are left with a comedy drama that has precious little comedy or drama; we don't even get Hitchcock usual inventive visual flourishes to give us something to find interesting. Instead we do get the small mercy of the beautiful background of Vermont and some often sweet romances but little investment in the titular mystery.