Dr. Giggles

Dr. Giggles

In 1957, Evan Rendell flees after his father is lynched for killing multiple patients in his effort to find a replacement heart for his ailing wife. After 35 years, Evan escapes from a mental institution and returns to town for revenge, killing off residents one by one. When Jennifer and her friends break into the Rendell house out of morbid curiosity, Evan notices Jennifer has a heart condition similar to his mother and decides to make her his final victim.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:95 minutes
  • Release:1992
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:explosion,   murder,   fire,  

When the psychopathic son of a mass-murdering doctor escapes from a mental institution, he wreaks graphic medical vengeance on the citizens of the town where his father was finally captured. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Dr. Giggles torrent reviews

James C (mx) wrote: When three friends undertake a school video project exploring how dread manifests itself in other people, things are taken to a level that is far beyond what was intended.Here we have a indie horror movie based on a short story by Clive Barker dealing with his trademark vision of the darker side of human psyche. The storyline starts off very strongly as it investigates the three main characters and the people they come in contact with, but as the movie comes to it's finale it begins to become quite 'in your face' and reminded this viewer of the short lived torture porn genre of a few years back, which is a shame as a lot of the unsettling atmosphere was lost. The young actors all play their roles well, but it is all the other people being interviewed that end up being the most interesting characters. The production values are high, and small main cast and limited use of sets work well together. The gore is saved until the last part of the movie, and as I mentioned above, even though it is well produced (and quite nasty in some places), it does detract a little from the more psychological feel of the the first part of the movie. All in all this is quite an enjoyable film, but one feels that it could have had a little more substance.

Leon B (kr) wrote: Review:This is another one of this British gangster movies about a guy who is down on his luck and finds himself in a impossible situation after stealing the wrong car. As usual, there's sex and violence throughout with your everyday cockney bad language. As this film came out at 2010, there was quite an audience for this type of movie in the UK, but there's just way too many of these films in this genre nowadays. Michael Madsen made the movie a slight more interesting, but the film wasn't anything out of the norm. On the plus side, the storyline isn't that bad and there is enough material to keep,you interested. Average!Round-Up:Leo Gregory is his usual cockney self in this movie and the switch from owing people money to becoming a crime boss, was played quite well. I would like to see him play another type of role because he seems to act the same in all of his movies. The same goes for Vincent Regan who plays a crime boss, like he does in many of his movies. Basically, the film is what it says ok the tin so don't expect anything that amazing.Budget: $5millionWorldwide Gross: N/AI recommend this movie to people who are into there British Gangster movies about a guy whose down on his luck until he helps a crime boss. 3/10

Rachael D (au) wrote: Fantastic! I never knew there was so much to the GI anti-war movement. And, of course, the parallels to today's war are chilling.

Kade C (es) wrote: Probably the best Batman origin story put on film, the first in Christopher Nolan's trilogy is epic in it's simplicity and style. Christian Bale as Batman is fantastic, along with Michael Caine as Alfred. The entire cast is phenomenal, and the movie's script is a perfect introduction to quite possibly the greatest superhero trilogy of all time.

kevin s (ag) wrote: This movie is pretty damn terrible. Bad acting, terrible "special effects", and way too homoerotic for my tastes. That being said, I was never really bored with it and the film does have a few decent jokes. Think of it as an 80's Scrream but with fewer laughs and no scares. haha

Steve S (mx) wrote: ***Due to the recent RT changes that have basically ruined my past reviews, I am mostly only giving a rating rather than a full review.***

Eirin H (de) wrote: David Suchet is brilliant..