At the NFL Draft, general manager Sonny Weaver has the opportunity to rebuild his team when he trades for the number one pick. He must decide what he's willing to sacrifice on a life-changing day for a few hundred young men with NFL dreams.
t the NFL Draft, general manager Sonny Weaver has the opportunity to rebuild his team when he trades for the number one pick. Now he is torn between a lower-ranked linebacker with a questionable past or a celebrated quarterback with a questionable future. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Draft Day torrent reviews
(ca) wrote: aburridora y ridcula en muchos aspectos.
(mx) wrote: It is a funny movie man
(gb) wrote: The impressive true story of a writer/philosopher. Very dramatic. Eric Bana's best performance i suppose.
(gb) wrote: Really good. Very inspirational.
(de) wrote: shit story for a great beast
(br) wrote: Really disappointed in this one. Conneley is my girl and while she was the lone standout here in the psychological thriller (if you want to call it that) the movie offered no genuine excitement, no thrilling pace, no scares, no real fear was felt in this dud. It's the story of a mom and daughter who move into a run down apartment that obviously has something going on with it. It just has a dreadful feel to it. Next the roofs start leaking, then an imaginary friend. All stuff we have seen before. It's predictable, and the sudden non surprise ending offers an even bigger dud
(kr) wrote: lol, it's like Conan the Barbarian with rock music. a few good one-liners too."Sire, your queen is 3,000 years old.""She told me she was 19!"
(mx) wrote: Kind of shitty yet entertaining.
(nl) wrote: A honest to goodness cult classic brilliant but stupid, some would say an exercise in schlock filmmaking but the dialogue is perfectly said, and Tom Atkins is wonderful as Ray Cameron and the movie is wonderfully paced its a shame no one really knows about this movie.
(br) wrote: First true native american Movie...
(jp) wrote: 11/22/2014: It was an ok movie. Pacino did a great job and there was an interesting twist, but the story was pretty dull and generally uninteresting.
(es) wrote: It had been a while since I dusted this one off but I've been on a 60's kick this week and this James Coburn spy flic is one of the best; more great sets & costumes . . .
(de) wrote: William Shakespeare's tragic "Hamlet" is my favorite play -- one of the most mysterious and open to interpretation of all time (and thus there have been and will be many different takes on it) -- and so I watch it with a closer eye than most. In this outing, what has been done with the meager stage is commendable -- particularly a black, mirror-titled floor that gives the room an unsettling feeling. The film does have a darker atmosphere than most filmed productions, which is a step in the right direction for once, and the effort is evidently there to make this likely dazzling stage production into a movie. However, as time begins to drag in the second half and we realize the director has no more cinematic tricks in store for us, the film starts to fail to translate, outstays its welcome. That's not to say director Gregory Doran does not come up with some unsettling images -- he's mostly helped from his cast I think. The action here pales in comparison to other filmed versions.Kenneth Branaugh's film suffered from many of the same problem, he did not re-imagine it for film so much as plop it on, this film makes some more interesting use of camera angles as well as the faces of the perfect cast. The performances are inspired and delicately nuanced. Polonius, Ophelia, Laertes are decent but the real find is the sweet-natured Horatio, one of the best we've had alongside one of the best Gertrudes (a little unsure of her new husband, devastated by the possibility of madness in her son, not the witch Hamlet makes her out to be, caring and sensible), the best Claudius and the ominous and ruthlessly haunting ghost father of Hamlet (both played by a masterful Patrick Stewart -- this is some of his strongest work an actor) who is so careful in how he acts he is virtually unreadable. What exactly does Claudius think? All of his actions have two layers and Stewart's performance can be considered from two perspectives at any moment. Then there's the eccentric/sardonic/neurotic Hamlet played by David Tennant -- an impressive, unforgettably inventive, high-wire performance that takes big risks but never steps wrong. His key is to make Hamlet an intellectual... but one that is also a bit of a Steve Coogan kook, perhaps too clever for his own good, or worse just weird. His turmoil comes from being bothered by ideas. This is much different and more playful than the spoiled rich emo mess Hamlet played by Ethan Hawke in a very fitting contemporary update of Hamlet and the raging, mother-loving nut that is Gibson's Hamlet. (Branaugh and Olivier just played themselves as Hamlet, neither performance intrigues me.) Tennant's may be the greatest yet.And this film gets much right where others have been too literal, simplistic or condescending towards the material. From beginning to end we can never be sure whether Claudius is guilty or not and though Hamlet seems to be spinning into lunacy there is a sort of genius to Tennant's work here that keeps us on the edge of the doubt: perhaps there is a method to Hamlet's madness? As for the Royal Shakespeare's Company approach to turning their expertly designed staged productions into films, it's not so much their budget that fell short, nor was it the considerable talent assembled, and certainly not a lack of intelligence in reading the play but maybe a lack of imagination in capturing it. Still, they wouldn't be the first to miss there, and this more complex and enigmatic "Hamlet" and Hamlet may be a sign of things to come.
(br) wrote: actually this was weak for being one of the 8 movies to die for. it had me confused for over half the movie
(br) wrote: Psychopath sniper terrorizes San Francisco and the only man to stop him is "Dirty Harry" Callahan. This is the blueprint for all those "bad cop doing the right thing" movies and tv series later. Eastwoods defining role alongside the Man with no name. A bit dated with the (now) funny hairdos and clothes of the 70's but this is still a solid thriller with a gritty look of the genre.
(es) wrote: we need melissa macarthy to make better movies than this. a few funny spots but pretty bland as well. not too bad
(ag) wrote: Speed made him a star this should have finished him. Absolute dreadful film that should have no one of any worth in and should be direct to dvd tosh. Keane reeves is the worst in this,as wooden as he's ever been