Drool

Drool

An abused wife's plan to escape her husband goes awry when she accidentally kills him, causing her to split on a cross-country drive with her best friend and his corpse in tow.

An abused wife's plan to escape her husband goes awry when she accidentally kills him, causing her to split on a cross-country drive with her best friend and his corpse in tow. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Drool torrent reviews

Steve F (kr) wrote: One of the worst movies i've seen in years.The acting was terrible and the story just seemed to go nowhere.Again this is a movie where the trailer misleads you by showing the good bits

Bill A (fr) wrote: A very touching eloquent film that is ultimately heart wrenching. The two protagonists give a superb performance that makes this film very emotive and powerful. Joseph gordon-levitt gives an outstanding performance that carries this film through its entirety. His performance is the shining star in this ultimately troubling film and sustains the viewer throughout. He pours his heart and soul into the role and his immense acting talent is made very obvious.

Leon H (ru) wrote: A great and hilarious fourth movie from a film series with five films. It is a good comedy, with its good taste in jokes. It is also very good because it has movie spoofs that are well known to the public.

Rune S (ru) wrote: Komedie som jeg faktisk lo av. Det er lenge siden sist!

Yevgeniy S (br) wrote: very good. shows some part of history i was not aware off.

Charlie M (ru) wrote: Dark and humorous tale of Joe Banks, a loser of sorts who is told he's going to die. he is then told by a stranger that he will pay for him to jump inside a volcano. Although not for all tastes, this comedy delivers.

Sean L (it) wrote: It's a little amazing, really, how quickly the original Superman franchise eroded into bad comedy. This being the ground floor of that descent, it bears little similarity to the original film beyond several key casting choices and a spit curl. Christopher Reeve returns as the title character, of course, with Margot Kidder suffering an expanded role and Gene Hackman back from a one-film exile to ham it up once again as a clueless, underwhelming Lex Luthor. Filling the Richard Pryor "why?!" role from the previous film is Jon Cryer, better known as Duckie in Pretty in Pink, who plays some sort of pointless, meandering male twist on the Valley Girl stereotype that was rolling through culture at the time. I'm still not entirely sure why he was elbowed into the plot. This isn't aggressively bad like Superman III, it's just hopelessly inept. In fact, the core of the story has a lot of potential: Superman, inspired by a letter from a young boy, destroys the world's nuclear armaments and discovers that some problems can't be solved quite so easily. It sputters and fails right on the launchpad, though, and soon falls back on a muscle-flexing brawl with some generic evil menace to solve the problem. Its grasp on physics, and reality as a whole, is so loose it's almost adorable. I'd pat my four-year-old son on the head and smile if he suggested we move the moon around to keep the sun out of his eyes, but for this film that's a legitimate solution. To say its answers make any sense would be an insult to sense itself. The whole thing plays like an easy answer to a complex problem, from the story to the editing to the acting to the effects work. These older superhero movies don't hold up to the rigors of time as a whole, but Superman IV looks particularly bad in a modern setting. Even the hero's indistinguishable costume seems cut-rate and fake, like they'd forgotten to commission a wardrobe department until the night before production. Head-shakingly pointless and dull, this film only seems to exist to kill time. Which, thankfully, it doesn't demand in great quantities. While the original cut came in at over two hours, some greedy last-minute cuts trimmed it down to a slim ninety minutes. Why the late edits? To ensure a few more showings each day at theaters nationwide. Of course.

g y (gb) wrote: Flawless, tense, exciting

America V (fr) wrote: The Hunger Games has its moments, but isn't nearly as amazing as the book its based off of.