Blogger William Cassidy and alien researcher Joe Sullivan happen to witness a strange event on the night of a solar storm. Two men then are hunted by an unseen person and try to survive. Another mystery group starts their research to reveal the thing happen that night which is believed to be harmful to the Earth. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
You may also like
Ejecta torrent reviews
Kyle K (nl) wrote: I thought this was OK. However I do find it quite unlikely that a man with rose Byrne would dump her for Anna Faris who they really made her look frumpy. But for an English movie I thought it was pretty funny.
Lainey A (ca) wrote: Its a blood sport and this is just for preschool, which is unbelievable
gary t (ag) wrote: wow what a movie i have just seen this movie 4 the 1st time n think that this is a cracking piece of documentary movie making because its really enjoyable as anything....this has got a really good cast of actors/actressess throughout this movie...i think that the director of this Documentary movie had done a really good job of directing this movie because its really powerful movie as welln u never know what 2 expect thorughout this movie because the director of this Documentary movie keeps you on the edge's of your seats throguhout this movie n its a good relationship between cinematographer/filmmaker Haskell Wexler and his son Mark
James R (jp) wrote: A decent documentary on the Middle East news channel Al Jazeera. The movie shows it's side and opinion of the Iraq War and it brings up many good points, but it still is biased in it's own opinion on what is going on. Overall, this really shows how you cannot trust the media without looking into things yourself.
Geir F (ru) wrote: A technically impressive, but narratively stale piece of fantasy. The marvellous puppeteering never ceases to amaze, but it can only carry the movie for so long. The story is wholly unoriginal, and doesn't engage on even a basic level, and this is ultimately the film's undoing. A shame.
Barry M (br) wrote: Words cannot convey how utterly joyless and stupid this film is. I've seen cartoons from the 50s with richer plots.
Ellen S (jp) wrote: It was exactly what I had expected it to be. It was an easy watch without too much thinking involved. I really liked Ellen DeGeneres's character, it was interesting to watch her be attracted to men when we all know she's not. It was decent, but nothing to write home about.
Kevin M (ca) wrote: Not a horror film, but a sci-fi drama. This movie plays out like a stand-alone film that was adapted to fit the Ring Series. The ghost-girl comes across as just another person. You actuality feel more sympathy for her than you do fear.
Michael T (us) wrote: A minor Allen vehicle, that is mostly hit and miss, but has enough charm to be worth a visit.
Carlos I (au) wrote: It gets pretty convoluted for this kind of movie. I mean seriously, I got lost a couple times. Still, it's got a great place and is loads of fun. Love how it shines a bit of a light on various effects and how they're used.
Yoviendra E (fr) wrote: The ending duel...is awesome....
Stephen C (br) wrote: early expressionistic nightmare piece that gives a true indication of the paranoia of film noir
Steve W (ca) wrote: Its a heavy handed topic but a decent film about America's shame during the Vietnam war. There is a pretty awkward speech near the end that gets really preachy, but the performances are top notch and the film is brutal in all the ways that it needs to be. DePalma leads a solid director's touch for a powerful if kind of dated film.
Andres G (jp) wrote: The stereotypical sports movie about a character which goes from glory to hell and back to the glory again.The story is OK, but nothing new. Crowe performs well, but it is not one of his best movies. Giamatti is great, as always but Zellwegger is too cheesy in her role.Just an entertaining movie without any more intentions.
Annabel L (it) wrote: Not the worst movie ever, but definitely not the best. The animation is just okay, the storyline is just okay (although a little weird at times), and the music is just okay. Nothing to spectacular but and entertaining summer movie to keep the kids busy for an hour or so.
Justin R (jp) wrote: "My Dinner With Andr" is a 1981 film directed by Louis Malle, and a billed cast of only four actors. Our story centers around two old friends (Wallace Shawn, Andre Gregory) reconnecting over red wine and cooked quail while discussing the past, as well as their contrasting beliefs.The movie begins with Wally (Wallace Shawn) narrating bits and pieces about his life as he walks to a fancy dinner he planned with a previous business partner or his. Not too much back-story is given on either Wally or Andre (Andre Gregory), but it becomes apparent that the film's focus centers around the subjects of conversation, rather than the characters themselves. Once these two get past the icebreakers at the bar and get seated is when the movie really starts to pick up. From here on out there is no internal thinking from Wally, but instead a very deep and personally conversation between two good friends.While one might think they'd be a third wheel coming into dinner with these two, the audience is easily dragged into the heat of the discussion, often giving time to ponder ones own thoughts on the matter. Where "My Dinner With Andr" excels at is what it sets out to do; pose a friendly connection that slowly devolves into a verbal debate about their clashing worldviews. Like "12 Angry Men" (1957), the movie only takes place in one room, which happens to be even smaller here than in "12 Angry Men". Thankfully, the dialogue is so well crafted and executed that not a moment of the two hour running time runs dry."My Dinner With Andr" manages to make you think on multiple occasions. The couple brings up many philosophical topics; humanity, society, life, and so on without ever coming off as pretentious. Where most movies fail at this matter is that the deep questions aren't brought up naturally, but here they come accompanied with many stories from each man's past. "My Dinner..." is not a movie for the mind that does not want to think because that's half the fun of watching it.Where other movies like "12 Angry Men" and "The Hateful Eight" (2015) take place in a single room/house flourish with beautifully shot cinematography, "My Dinner With Andr" meanders into repeated angles with little activity or expression. I bring this up as a shame because the rest of it works so well. There is the occasional waiter coming by to collect half eaten courses and refilling glasses, but there's not enough action on screen to entertain those who are not completely devoured by the ongoing chit chat. The camera serves merely as a way to capture the discussion, rather than create a visually inspiring feature.Deep, thought provoking, and often funny, "My Dinner With Andr" is great fun for lovers of thoroughly thought out dialogue like myself. While a general crowd of 2017 standards may fall victim to wanting to check the time or their Facebook, I assure you that you need not to, for there is multiple messages to receive and ponder on for a long time.