An aspiring actress from Australia, Ellie Parker (Naomi Watts), lives a hectic Hollywood lifestyle, perpetually trying to land the role that will elevate her career. Living with her lothario musician boyfriend, Justin (Mark Pelligrino), Ellie is far from happy, finding support primarily from her friend Sam (Rebecca Rigg). When Ellie meets Chris (Scott Coffey) after a minor traffic accident, she sees new potential for both romance and her life in general.
- Stars:Naomi Watts, Jennifer Syme, Greg Freitas, Gaye Pope, Blair Mastbaum, Jessica Vogl, Johanna Ray, Rebecca Rigg, Mark Pellegrino, Kim Fay, Scott Coffey, Todd Coffey, David Baer, Marcel Sarmiento, Robbi Chong,
- Director:Scott Coffey,
- Writer:Scott Coffey
A hilarious comic portrait of a young woman's struggle for integrity, happiness and a Hollywood acting career. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Ellie Parker torrent reviews
(ru) wrote: Best movie if your religious.
(nl) wrote: The plot is more layered and complex but underdeveloped. The wicked gore effects are still there but so are the rest of the problems from the first film.
(ca) wrote: The Lords of Salem doesn't make its historically horrifying throwback to the Salem witch trials quite as comprehensible as it should, but thanks to Rob Zombie's typically stylish work behind the camera -- and his equally talented wife in front of it -- it remains another golden, well-crafted entry into both of their instantly intriguing filmographies.
(br) wrote: One true classic horror in the 1980s' HK Cinema.
(ca) wrote: Poor action movie with Kristofferon and DMX. For an action movie, this was filled with very little action and constant talking. The script was directionless with scene and scene unrelated to what was supposed to be happening. Dreadful!
(de) wrote: better than I thought it will be / Madonna dala rade
(it) wrote: the best ghost story of all time how anyone can say its not good is totally beyond me clearly they have no idea of what makes a great movie five stars from me best director best actor best supporting actor if there was any justice in the film industry.
(de) wrote: only works thanks to seann william scotts oddball character. this film just never works like it should
(gb) wrote: Yeah, that's me, biased again. But this movie is rock solid. Coming out Nov 9th, 2007
(de) wrote: one of the best love move i have ever watched.
(au) wrote: Interesting and imaginative.
(es) wrote: pretty scary in a strang way. i am a big Alice Krige fan she is good in thrillers. this movir didnt get a lot of play but it is worth watching with your man, snuggled up on the couch
(ag) wrote: Good movie. Very funny. Stripes meets summer camp.
(us) wrote: A fantastic sequel, pushing the narrative and commentary forward. Only small poor choices in a tremendously strong feature.
(us) wrote: Gary Cooper is charming in this silly, light rom com
(kr) wrote: Unexpected .. a film that neither the Christian media industry nor Hollywood could make. Digs deeper than most films today.
(kr) wrote: Ed Wood lives and he is Persian!This is truly to worst film that I have ever seen in a theater. It makes you wonder whether commercial theaters should have some minimum standard before allowing a film to be shown and having people pay money (full price, believe it or not) to see a picture like this; sitting in the comfortable seats which are normally reserved for legitimate productions. This one looked like a student from film school put together as project for a grade. I would give this an "F". I only give it one star because this is the lowest score available. It does not deserve a star at all.At the end of the film, the words "the End" appeared on the screen and someone in the very back of the theaters stood up and said, loudly, "Thank Goodness that is over!" He got a round of applause from all around. As they were leaving I heard people talking about seeing the manager about getting their money back. They all felt that they had been tricked into buying a ticket and had expected a professional production. This was not the case. The following are the reasons that you might be tricked into spending your money on this disaster.1. Patrick Stewart is the credits: It's a trick. He does not appear on screen and only did about 5 mins of voice work through the entire film.2. Dynamation is back!: Don't believe it. The poorest work of Ray Harryhausen was better than any of this. Much looked like it was done with playdoe. (The Rok was pretty good)3. The first Persian actor to play Sinbad: Don't belive it. He may be Persian but he can't act! He has one expression throughout the entire film and only cracks a smile in the last scene. The fact that he wrote, directed, acted and produced the film should have tipped me off. He cannot write. Everyone laughed over a line where Sinbad was praising the princess' beauty. He said that she had "snow capped cheeks". (What does that mean? I thought cheeks were supposed to be rosey. I asked a Persian friend of mine if that expression was one used in Iran. He had never heard of it.) Shahin Sean Solimon cannot direct. It seems that the entire film was a huge ego production. His sole function as director seems to be to make sure that he was in every scene. I even suspect (I would love to find out If I am right about this) that he dressed up in a costume with a mask and played the evil villain in one of the first scenes where the princess is kidnapped. If this is true, and I believe it is, it is a bad sign of an ego run wild. The movie is confusing and had a disturbing lack of continuity. The movie starts with a flash back within a flash back. Many times I was confused as to what was going on and could not figure out the continutity. There was no chemistry between Sinbad and the Princess. The Villian needed some direction regarding his bizarre facial expressions (not to mention make up which was erratic from scene to scene). It seems that no attempt was made to direct any of the actors in any professional manner. It also appears (and I may be wrong about this) that many scenes were cut which might have made more sense out of the plot. There seems to have been a treasure scene, which we do not see. Suddenly, for no reason, Sinbad is in a cave and reaches into what appears to be a pile of gold and jewels. He picks up a lamp, for no reason, and rubs it and then falls asleep. It was completely contrived and made no sense. The choice in music was poor and often inappropriate for the scenes that it was backing. Well, not everyone can be Woody Allen, but at one point in the film, where Sinbad was in a poorly constructed set, mouthing some ridiculous dialogue that my wife turned to me and asked me whether or not this reminded me of the graveyard Scene from "Plan 9 from Outer Space". At that point I realized that I was experiencing the same feeling that I felt when I first saw that movie. I felt as if I was watching something ineptly contrived by someone who had no experience or talent. That "lack of talent" was was the over ridding theme of every scene. At that point, I realized the only real reason that anyone should see this film. It is the same reason that you would see any Ed Wood film. You should see this film to see if it is really as bad as I feel that it is. I would love to hear from others who have actually put money down to see it in the theaters, and see if they agree with me that Ed Wood now has a rival as the worst director, writer and actor that has ever been in a film that has made it into the legitimate theaters. People should invite their friends and make side comments while the movie is running to see who can make the best jokes while watching this movie. On the other hand, the sound was great and the animation in the credits was well done.
(mx) wrote: Thursday, August 25, 2011 (1988) Tequila Sunrise THRILLER/ ROMANTIC The opposite of Mel Gibson's popular Lethal Weapon films, and continuing his anti- hero image, Mel Gibson stars as a drug runner with old school chum Kurt Russell as an officer at his tail- he doesn't like the boss he works with and gets along with the Mel Gibson character well, and of couse, a girl (Michelle Phiffer) stands between them! The thin plot serves nothing more, than a backdrop for the romantic love triangle or rendevous that exists amongt it's actors which is part of the films chrisma; attractive yuppie style cast in a beautiful setting is basically all it is! Alot of people were so dissappointed since they thought it had action in it, and was very dissappointed that it was nothing but a romance! 2.5 out of 4