Emmanuelle 6

Emmanuelle 6

Journey with Emmanuelle and the world's most excuisite models deep into the Amazon jungle to the heart of paradise. Beauty can be dangerous and the women soon find themselves captive to a powerful drug lord. Now they must escape from a land of darkness

Journey with Emmanuelle and the world's most excuisite models deep into the Amazon jungle to the heart of paradise. Beauty can be dangerous and the women soon find themselves captive to a ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Emmanuelle 6 torrent reviews

Tom M (nl) wrote: This movie is amazingly lop-sided. It(TM)s got a great cast and excellent special effects and production design for its budget. On the other hand, it(TM)s horribly written, acted and edited.A title change, a totally new story concept and a good director could have turned this movie into something special with the raw materials that were here. It could have been a new Pitch Black?, but instead it(TM)s fodder for some future Mystery Science Theater 3000 revival.And what(TM)s up with John Malkovich(TM)s lines in this movie? His reading / acting his horrible! Very stilted and halting in an odd way that(TM)s not really part of building a character but more like an actor who is being blackmailed into working on this movie for some reason. And even genre movie star Ron Perlman walks through his character with disinterest.

Max G (it) wrote: A great, funny film with lots of comical graphic violence!Overall 8.5/10 or 4 stars

Brandon R (jp) wrote: My least favorite of the series but still good.

Jamie C (nl) wrote: The first hour plus is just like any other kidnapp film then at the end they go to a bar full of vampires, it was very entertaining from start to finish, It just felt like the didn't know how to end the film so they stuck vampires in it.

Drew E (au) wrote: Great movie. Bryce is a dime, Dex is a bit whiney but ends up redeeming himself. The action shots are actually awesome even though it's a 1993 movie. They also have 1 scene of an old snowboarder shredding that gnar gnar.

Leanne W (br) wrote: tearjearker,true story + very gud film

Jackie T (ca) wrote: I adore Sandy Dennis. Sweet movie.... I realized half way though that this was the original & I had seen the remake.

Robert H (ca) wrote: Everything about this movie looked amateurish and cheap, there was hardly a story to speak of, and no half-decent performances. Even Wesley Snipes looked like he was bored most of the time. It was mostly humorless, with few of Snipes' trademark one-liners. The "story" (if one can call it that) concerns a gunman who is out for revenge against a gang who raped and killed his woman. The only catch is that after he kills people they come back as zombies, so he has to kill them again. On the subject of zombies, here they aren't zombies in the traditional sense. They're more like reanimated people that have complete use of their mental and physical faculties, except that their skin starts to deteriorate and they have to kill to get fresh skin to put on. Weird, I know. Nothing in the movie makes sense, and they don't even bother explaining most of it. They don't even explain why Snipes' character (Aman) is cursed until there's 20 minutes left in the movie, almost as an afterthought. There is an attempt to give Aman some back-story, but most of it has no bearing whatsoever on the plot except to explain how and why he is where he is. Not only that, but Snipes doesn't have too much dialogue in the movie at all. Most of his lines early on are simply one-word replies to other characters' questions. Along the way, he picks up a sidekick for no reason at all who he then later shoots and kills. It's explained as a "mercy killing", but honestly why would Aman curse someone to a life where they have to kill people to get fresh skin? He could have just let him die an agonizing death, but then there would be nobody to romance the whore who inexplicably survives to the very end. Moving on (because I'm tired of rehashing the entire story). The visual effects are pretty bad, although there are a couple of good sequences where Snipes' rips some people's heads off. Still looked extremely fake, though. There's also several gun battles, but they end too quickly and are shoddily edited. There's also extensive variation in picture quality, probably because they filmed the movie on a few different cameras. Some shots in particular look really digital and have a sort-of "soap opera" quality to them. Sometimes the shot quality changes from cut to cut within a scene. The score is ok, although too much of it was some cheesy guitar noodling. So, is this worth watching? Only if you're drunk, like bad movies and have nothing better to do. The only reason I watched it was because of Wesley Snipes, who has several "so bad they're good" movies in his filmography. This isn't one of them. Quite frankly, it was boring and almost put me to sleep on a several occasions. Watch at your own peril.

Greg W (nl) wrote: well crafted period pic