Autumn 1978 in suburban Sweden. Everything seems to be fine with the middle class Bendrick family with their two teenage children and a younger son, until the mother starts seeing her first... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Autumn 1978 in suburban Sweden. Everything seems to be fine with the middle class Bendrick family with their two teenage children and a younger son, until the mother starts seeing her first...
You may also like
Family Secrets torrent reviews
Michael H (kr) wrote: Amazing experience at the cinema, not that great on DVD. Loki stole the show, but Chris Eccleston was a bit one-dimensional as the baddie.
Mike M (fr) wrote: As a classical rookie, I couldn't say for sure whether it's as comprehensive as it often seems, but this is unquestionably a learned yet accessible film, allowing itself plenty of time to give both major and minor works an airing, while regularly unearthing fun biographical titbits.
amelia b (us) wrote: Hysterical and totally surprising!
q o (gb) wrote: i liked the first story very much. interesting way of presentation for the second one, but i almost fell asleep because there was no dialogue and i couldn't really understand the old chinese words. i didn't really get the last one either because my DVD had no subtitles and they were mumbling a lot, but shu qi was super hot. ;) overall an interesting look at love in 3 different periods, beautiful and well filmed.
John H (kr) wrote: Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker shows its worth with this boldly adult take on the classic cartoon from the late 1990s to early 2000s. True to the Batman mythos, well directed though it could have been a little longer and it would have made a phenomenal live-action Batman film.
Joy E (gb) wrote: Smart, funny, intense, loved it!!!!
Carolyn G (ca) wrote: Not perfect but a sweet, unassuming little story about friends and first loves. Chris O'Donnell is adorable here but I wasn't fond of the bad brogue. This is definitely where I fell in woman-love w/ Minnie Driver and to this day, still feel she can do no wrong!
kyo 9 (de) wrote: a very nice plot and acting..a good friend never betray his mates..even at the very end when he knew that if he didn't do something, others might destroy them both..
Trey M (it) wrote: A great film, but I seen better. The movie shows great character building. Personally I did not like the ending, but that's only my opinion I highly recommend this movie only if you love foreign cultures or Japan in general.
Archie G (es) wrote: Cheeky, spicy and flamboyant! Keep it up and I might give them some blazing sandals.
John R (ag) wrote: Everybody's crooked!
Paul C (it) wrote: Very different from the other Argento's that I'd seen - but in a good way - a lot more elegant too, if that makes any sense. I'd definitely say it was up there with some of the best Hitchcock films from the 60s and is well worth watching. Some really creepy moments - especially the killings and the graveyard scenes and the music is, of course, exceptional being Ennio Morricone. Keeps you guessing and wrong-foots you as to who the killer is right until the last 10 minutes too.
Philip Z (gb) wrote: All the whimsy gave me a headache, and after about an hour of it I was ready for it to end. Now, I've liked screwball comedies before, in fact, Howard Hawks' His Girl Friday is one of my favorite movies from this period, but Arsenic and Old Lace just didn't do much for me. I'm giving it a 6 because I can't totally dismiss a film that has this much energy and with the inclusion of Peter Lorre and a Frankenstein look-a-like, nor can I deny the immense charm of actor Cary Grant. However, if I were being honest about how I personally felt watching the movie: I'd probably give it a 5.
Nicolette H (kr) wrote: I don't know what it was but this movie just didn't sit well well with me. I mean it was good but I found it slow at times. Juliette Binoche is amazing. I don't see what the big deal was with Kirsten Stewart. I mean yes I think this was the best performance from her, so far but I didn't think it was better than other performances from the year and definitely not that great to get a Oscar Nomination. The story was interesting but really the only reason I would say to see it is for the performances. Really isn't a movie I need to own or have watched since.
Jason M (br) wrote: Pleasingly non-flashy and non-thrilling, and I liked the stiff and eerily photo-realistic animation, but the story is a little over-simplified and just doesn't have the umph it aspires to.
Chad C (ru) wrote: My most absolute favorite vampire movie.