A talented runner (Lenora Crichlow) from a rough part of London joins the British track team and races for glory at the World Championships. There she develops an intense rivalry with an equally ambitious wealthy young athlete. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
A street smart runner develops an intense rivalry with an equally ambitious wealthy young athlete.
You may also like
Fast Girls torrent reviews
Stephen G (nl) wrote: The film is pretty funny, it's beautifully shot. The film seems to be mildly unsure of what it wants to say about relationships. Joaquin's performance is pretty good, he gives it everything he's got and he's not afraid to look weird. It's a bit too long. Amy coulda been more likable. It's probably worth a watch.
Jessica H (it) wrote: Typical romantic. Cute and funny, but nothing amazing.
Ultra V (us) wrote: Nostalgia~ Good Efforts & Intentions but the script was a bit of a let down...
Sal G (it) wrote: ok movie, some funny moments. just felt the movie was rushed too much. so many things were left unexplained. it was like watching 3 movies in 2 hours. the only positive was the hot chick in it lol
Jennifer W (de) wrote: Boring but pretty cool dance rom com has impressive dance scenes but nothing else.
David M (ag) wrote: Surprisingly good actually. Its clunky yes, and juvenille at times, but Rip Torn and Val Kilmer have hilarious supporting parts, and Blevins puts in a good first performance. You've got to love a movie about agoraphobic heroin junkies.
Brandon W (fr) wrote: Knocked Up is directed and written by Judd Apatow, and it stars Seth Rogen, Katherine Heigi, Paul Rudd, and Leslie Mann in a comedy film about a one night stand between a guy who doesn't do anything in his life, and a woman that works at E!, and so when it turned into an unintentional pregnancy, they meet up with each other, and start to get to know each other. I'm a fan of Judd Apatow's films and seen them all that he directed, so with this movie, Knocked Up is a very hilarious one. Seth Rogen and Katherine Heigi are really funny in it and have great chemistry together that is realistic and relatable. The humor is really good, and even the raunchy parts get a laugh out of me too. The cast are really good, which is cool to see Ken Jeong not act like his usual self in the later films that he's in, and seeing the late Harold Ramis look so happy, it makes me happy for some reason. The script by Judd Apatow is really well done as it creates some great characters. It's very sweet, has a lot of heart, and a lot of jokes that would entertain the viewers that are trying to find a film that's funny.
Tim M (us) wrote: Bale does it again with an explosively convincing performance. Acting on par with American Psycho and The Prestige.
Emilia Cinia P (de) wrote: The american version of the Taro Urashima's story.
Gianluca B (kr) wrote: Sar che l'"arte di Pollock" non mi interessa, ma nemmeno la sua biografia mi pare cos tremendamente coinvolgente. Un 5 per l'impegno.
Justin N (ru) wrote: I didn't expect the film to revolve so heavily around the subject of Holocaust denial, but it revealed quite a bit of information about it that I didn't previously know. A hard film to watch, but a good one.
Al M (us) wrote: Lynch's entry in the Lumiere and Company film is actually a rather successful piece of horrific cinema. Filmed on the Lumiere's cinematographe with a run time of less than 52 seconds, Lynch's entry features a single shot that is truly breathtaking and unexpected. An example of how short cinema can still achieve a genuinely visceral impact.
Brandon C (ag) wrote: The Lion King is a near perfect film with its memorable characters, great soundtrack, and gorgeous animation!
Duncan K (au) wrote: It's a good thing I saw this through Mystery Science Theater 3000, or I never would have made it.
Andrey B (es) wrote: Very charming amd mysterious.
Stanisaw D (kr) wrote: Tu es Petrus? Trouble Man jest jak 20 spalonych pierogw z mi?sem ?? solidny dobry obiad. Akcja toczy si? w latach 70-tych, kiedy to protagonista Mr T, osiedlowy cz?owiek od rozwi?zywania problemw, zostaje wpl?tany w intryg?, ktrej t?em s? porachunki gangsterskie. Trudno?? w jednoznacznej ocenie tego filmu sprawia fakt, e jego najs?absza strona jest zarazem jego atutem ?? mianowicie g?wny bohater. Mr T jest twardy jak adamantium, bystry, jak MacGuyver i czarny. Ewidentnie gruje nad wszystkimi innymi postaciami czy to policjantami czy gangsterami, czy bia?ymi czy czarnymi czy kotami czy rybami? Problem w tym, e przez to ma si? wraenie, e jest nietykalny i niezniszczalny, co powoduj?, e film si? d?uy troch? i przynudza? widzowie wiedz?, e nawet, gdy przegrywa i to i tak wygrywa (np. w bilard). Podsumowuj?c warto jest ten film zobaczy?, bo przy Mr T Rambo i Brudny Harry zapewne uczyli si? za?atwia? do nocnika?
Jeremy R (jp) wrote: lsd scientist gone wild