Ferry to Hong Kong
Mark Conrad, a habitual drunk and troublemaker with a shady past, is expelled by Hong Kong police after one too many bar fights. He's sent to Macao on the Fa Tsan, a ferry owned by Captain Hart. Conrad's papers are out of order and Macao refuses him entry. Unable to go ashore, Conrad is a permanent passenger on the ferry with Hart, who detests him. It's all one long, lazy voyage for Conrad until one fateful trip when an encounter with a typhoon and pirates forces Conrad to choose between an aimless drifter's life and becoming a man again.
- Stars:Curd Jürgens, Orson Welles, Sylvia Syms, Jeremy Spenser, Noel Purcell, Margaret Withers, John Wallace, Roy Chiao, Shelley Shen, Louis Seto, Milton Reid, Ronald Decent, Don Carlos, Nick Kendall, Kwan-San Lam,
- Director:Lewis Gilbert,
- Writer:Lewis Gilbert, Vernon Harris, John Mortimer (additional dialogue)
Mark Conrad, a habitual drunk and troublemaker with a shady past, is expelled by Hong Kong police after one too many bar fights. He's sent to Macao on the Fa Tsan, a ferry owned by Captain ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Ferry to Hong Kong torrent reviews
(nl) wrote: While it's not the most original film in the world (I spotted the twist about 1/3 of the way through), it's nice to see him making movies again.
(nl) wrote: Let's just say it's "arranged neatly" and won't add fuel to the Lebron haters' fire.
(es) wrote: Great movie. I have watched it 100 times.
(fr) wrote: I never read the comic, so this was a good movie for me
(au) wrote: I love Christmas Movies!!!
(de) wrote: starting was nice ending was bad
(ru) wrote: The dark humor and work by Richard E. Grant and Julian Sands make Warlock almost worth sitting through.
(kr) wrote: Another great Kevin Costner baseball film, loved it! Solid script and an interesting baseball tale that needs to be seen. Speaks of the great Walt Whitman and his stories and poems which made the movie more enjoyable.
(ag) wrote: A good prison flick.
(ag) wrote: ingrid pitt did a very good job
(de) wrote: 140 minutes of tedious, sappy cliche'. Painful to watch.
(ru) wrote: I give two stars only because if this had been the first movie to come out with this visual style, I would have been impressed. The movie is derivative, and quite a boring trainwreck. The story is easy to follow, but it plods along ever so slowly. This movie is memorable because I don't remember another time when I was so extremely underwhelmed.