Finding Joe

Finding Joe

While studying myths, and writing on the human experience, Joseph Campbell was a professor at Sarah Lawrence College for 38 years. His seminal work, "A Hero with a Thousand Faces" was published in 1949 and greatly influenced generations of artists and writers, including Bob Dylan, Jim Morrison, Stanley Kubrick, George Lucas, Jerry Garcia and others. Rooted in deeply personal accounts and timeless stories, FINDING JOE shows how Campbell's work is relevant and essential in today's world and how it provides a narrative for how to live a fully realized life-or as Campbell would simply state, how to "follow your bliss".

While studying myths, and writing on the human experience, Joseph Campbell was a professor at Sarah Lawrence College for 38 years. His seminal work, "A Hero with a Thousand Faces" was published in 1949 and greatly influenced generations of artists and writers, including Bob Dylan, Jim Morrison, Stanley Kubrick, George Lucas, Jerry Garcia and others. Rooted in deeply personal accounts and timeless stories, FINDING JOE shows how Campbell's work is relevant and essential in today's world and how it provides a narrative for how to live a fully realized life-or as Campbell would simply state, how to "follow your bliss". . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Finding Joe torrent reviews

Brody M (gb) wrote: This movie was OK but couldve definitely been way better

Magnus S (nl) wrote: boring not much to see.....

Edward D (au) wrote: This movie made me laugh and feel alive but almost cry.

Dorania (es) wrote: I love christmas movies this one is at the top.

Elaine H (kr) wrote: never heard of it and caught on one of those true movie channel - well its got kiefer sutherland so gotta be worth a look! what a lovely gentle film with impressive acting from both leads. loved it

Jeff B (nl) wrote: Cheesy but very watchable 80s teen comedy, it's the basic girl disguises herself as a boy, pretty much an earlier version of Never Been Kissed. Some surprisingly funny moments, as usual for 80s teen comedies some great songs, and always fun seeing the crazy 80s fashion everyone had. The end was a little too dull compared to everything leading up to it, but I don't mind too much. If you're a fan of these films it's worth checking out.

Justin B (ca) wrote: Born Free on crack. Part 60's/70's era Disney family comedy, part snuff film. It's insurmountably flawed given normal standards but as an experience of entertainment, it's of a unique breed that has to be seen.

Colin K (it) wrote: As a kid, I loved this movie. Seriously, it is a piece of shit. I love the original, but this does not come close or even merit such I high rating! I mean 3 is sort of better.

Jessica H (au) wrote: There are many things in this film that might scare a person,but the frogs are not one of those things. a better tittle for this film might have been Nature's plans. All in all it is not a good film if you are looking for something scary.

Chad M (ca) wrote: 2002's "Best Picture" Chicago, a screen adaptation of a long-running Broadway musical, was in-turn based on this comedy starring Ginger Rogers as the infamous killer. A little more digging reveals this movie was based on a stage play entitled Chicago that wasn't a musical. This version's details of the story don't exactly match up with those in its modern counterpart, and the role of the press is brought out more in this frame narrative style. The performance of Adolphe Menjou as Billy Flynn the defense attorney is more nuanced than later actors (including Richard Gere). Overall, this is a great movie that satirizes the role of the press in the justice system, and the justice system in general. A

Cody F (ag) wrote: A brutal story and sublime performance from Ed Norton power this great film.

Joseph B (nl) wrote: Usually when critics write of the great gangster pictures ever made, of course films by Martin Scorsese are mentioned as are "The Godfather" Trilogy and many old Hollywood pictures made by Warner Bros. Pictures in the 1930's to early 1940's. Very rarely is the 1980 John Mackenzie film "The Long Good Friday" ever mentioned. Perhaps, if it wasn't for this film Guy Ritchie never would've been inspired to make "Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels" which would feature many actors from "The Long Good Friday."Many gangster films depict the rise and fall of a particular gangster in the course of many years, but this film portrays London racketeer Harold Shand (Bob Hoskins) at the top of his game before it all unravels in a 24 hour period. It's not just a seminal British gangster picture but a full-blown mystery as well full of Cockney slang, political intrigue, social commentary and that posh British snubbery Americans love so much, or so Harold believes they do.It's the Easter holiday weekend and Harold has just returned home from a trip and although he runs the London underground and came up from a tough existence, he now spends his time on a yacht on the Thames River with his elegant wife Victoria (Helen Mirren). He is looking for financial help from the American mafia to help build an Olympic Stadium on the London Docklands for the 1988 Olympics. As he tries to woo his guests with pompous British arrogance and jingosim about a new chapter of London and their new role as the center of Europe as his closest associates are being murdered. His chauffeur is blown up by a car bomb outside of the church where he was waiting for Shand's mother and an undetonated bomb is found inside one of his casinos. Harold learns about this by phone and as he listens Hoskins's face tells us everything as the camera cuts to his hand subtly crushes his wine glass. But he can't deal with this at the moment when he is entertaining the Americans. As he gets into his car, that's when his number two man Jeff (Derek Thompson) informs him of the death of his close friend Colin (played by Martin Freeman who is most known by audiences for playing Belloq in "Raiders of the Lost Ark"). He and his wife decide to take the Americans to their favorite pub and just seconds before pulling up to the pub, a bomb goes off. Suddenly, things just got more complicated for Harold. The Americans give him 24 hours to straighten everything out or they're taking their money and hopping on the next plane back home.Bob Hoskins is wonderful in his breakout role. He plays Harold with the calmness he believes is necessary to get business done, but also has that range of acting that allows him to erupt at any given moment in the film. Often times cinematographer Phil Meheux follows Harold with a handheld camera as he paces back and forth trying to calm himself so he doesn't explode as he starts to breath heavily and drink more. Harold is a completely evil character who treats most characters in the film like dirt, especially when he visits certain lowlife gangsters who deal drugs, something Harold believes is beneath him. Through much of the film, you can't help but feel sympathetic to him because of everything that is happening to him. At times you feel what Harold feels and you may think to yourself, "Why today?" and as Harold slowly learns what is happening so does the audience. The slow buildup makes this story great, but it's the relationship between Harold and Victoria that seals this as one of the greatest British films of all-time.Helen Mirren portrays Victoria with such elegant sophistication that adds such depth to Hoskins's character. Without Victoria what would Harold be? Victoria is smart, sexy, and like Harold, she is just as shrewd and tact a bussinessman. She claims to have played lacrosse with Princess Anne adding to her background of privilege in contrast to Harold's. Why is a woman of this sophistication and her background attracted to Harold? It's power. She isn't your stereotypical mob moll who is nothing but a prop in the film and portrayed as weak and out of Harold's day-to-day dealings. She is a strong woman and she always remembers to carry herself when around people. When Harold goes off on one of his rages and even he doesn't know what he's going to do, Victoria is able to calm him down and make him think about what he's doing.The script was written by Barrie Keeffe but modified not only by director Mackenzie but by Helen Mirren who loved the script but didn't like the character she was offered. In the original script, Victoria was basically just what any gangster's wife was. She addressed those concerns and when she was told that changes would be made she signed on to do the picture. When filming was scheduled to begin she realized that much of her role wasn't changed. Mackenzie had her improvise a lot of her lines and build the character as the story progressed. Many of the greatest, tender moments between Harold and Victoria were improvised by the actors themselves. Mirren worked off Hoskins who worked off her and it's fantastic. One scene in the script called for a love scene between the two as all this chaos was going on, but Mirren didn't like the idea and she convinced Mackenzie it needed changed. The scene turned into a fight between Harold and Victoria that ultimately led to both characters breaking down out of fear of what was going on. As Harold comforts a crying Victoria, you sense the vulnerability Harold is willing to show to his wife but no one else and the same can be said about Victoria in Harold's presence.One of the most amazing scenes was actually suggested by Hoskins when all the other London gangsters were brought into a abattoir on meat hooks. Meheux even hung himself upside down on a meat hook holding a camera as he is pushed through the abattoir on the track getting a point of view of the gangsters as Harold and his men confront them. Other times Meheux does some fantastic camera movement shooting scenes in continuous takes that were improvised not distracting us from the action and raw emotion of Hoskins.The film's score works for this picture. It's a tense, rousing, sexy jazz-rock number composed by Francis Monkman who was a founding member of the British progressive rock band Curved Air. This is a film that works in every level and despite being released 36 years ago, it holds up very well. It's a very brutal film that contrasts capitalism and political terrorism and set the tone for the Margaret Thatcher Era in the United Kingdom. One of the things Harold just can't seem to understand that maybe many British people couldn't understand in the late 1970's and early 1980's, is that you can't reason with terrorism. Money can't solve all your problems and what good is money to political fanatics?