Some say that to be the leader of a country is one of the loneliest jobs in the world. But being the child of a world leader can be doubly so. Constantly surrounded by security officers, restricted in movements and having almost every waking moment carefully monitored makes normalcy an impossibility. No one knows this better than young Luke Davenport, the son of U.S. President Davenport. He vents his loneliness, frustration and feelings of isolation from family and friends by being a brat to his private Secret Service agent. When the agent snaps from the strain in front of the First Lady, a new agent is assigned to Luke. He turns out to be the enormous Sam Simms, a bit of a rogue who managed to rise through the ranks by sheer determination rather than strict adherence to Secret-Service protocol. At first, Luke tries all his old tricks upon Sam. But instead of getting angry, Sam seems to actually understand.
Simms is responsible for protecting the president's son- Luke so he must follow Luke everywhere Luke goes. Luke only want to be like every other kid and his bodyguard is disappeared. Their relationship become good when a school bully browbeats Luke , Simms teaches Luke how to fight. Morever, Simms helps Luke gain the heart of Luke's classmate. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Clive F (it) wrote: This was one of the most innovative and fun movies I've seen in awhile. Who doesn't feel for this cute, little Mormon girl who just wants to see the world?
Grant S (br) wrote: Not great, but better than expected.This movie had the makings of a B-grade (at best) vampire movie: Syfy channel, no-name actors. Plot seemed reasonable though, so I gave it a go.Plot turned out to be reasonably basic, and just a platform for action scenes. Action scenes were okay though. Performances were so-so, but not terrible.Ultimately, not that good, but not terrible. Had its moments, moved along briskly, and was reasonably short. Still had the feel of a made-for-TV B-grade movie though.
Geoffrey G (jp) wrote: Excellent film. Admittedly a rehash theme, but still well done
gary t (kr) wrote: WOW......WOW.....WOW.....SO SO SO SO SO BAD......MAN THIS IS SUCH AN AWFUL MESSY MESSY MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SO SO SO SO DREADFUL, IT IS SUCH AN AWFUL MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SO SO SO AWFUL MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SO SO SO DREADFUL, IT IS SO SO SO DREADFUL, IT IS SUCH AN AWFUL MOVIE 2 WATCH IT IS SUCH AN AWFUL MESSY MOVIE 2 WATCH.......WARNING THIS MOVIE CONTAINS STROBE LIGHTNING EFFECTS THROUGHOUT THIS MOVIE......MAN THIS IS SUCH AN AWFUL MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SUCH AN AWFUL MESSY MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SUCH AN AWFUL MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SUCH A BAD MOVIE 2 WATCH, JUST AVOID THIS MOVIE AT ALL IT IS SUCH A BAD MOVIE 2 WATCH, JUST AVOID THIS MOVIE AT ALL COSTS IT IS THAT BAD.....JUST DO NOT WATCH THIS MOVIE IT IS SO AWFUL.......ITS GOT A GOOD SOUNDTRACK THROUGHOUT THIS MOVIE.....BUT MAN THIS MOVIE IS SO SO SO AWFUL 2 WATCH....THE BEST THING ABOUT THIS MOVIE IS THE SOUNDTRACK, BUT MAN THIS IS SUCH AN AWFUL MOVIE 2 WATCH......
Adam B (de) wrote: i find it hard to explain why i like this movie so much outside of the fact that Belushi gave a great performance in what i definitely wouldn't consider a comedy not much for nature and i hate movie love stories, what a head scratcher, must just be Belushi
Millo T (ru) wrote: Although some aspects are a little mean and simplistic, and the second part is much weaker than the first part, the great moments in the first half of the movie, the great use of the images, the subtility in, however, quite a clear and bright message, with the cathartic moment of crisis and resurrection of the feeling, all that makes this movie worth. Marvelous in some aspects.