Gangaa Jamunaa Saraswathi

Gangaa Jamunaa Saraswathi

Gangaa Jamunaa and Saraswathi the most pious rivers, create a unique holy merger, popularly known as "Sangam". Likewise the characters of our story Gangaa Jamunaa and Saraswathi desire to ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Gangaa Jamunaa Saraswathi torrent reviews

Jeff B (ca) wrote: Too slow and too confusing with the characters. Quit half way through because lost my interest.

Nick A (de) wrote: The only good thing about this movie is the setting, meaning the costumes and the town. The evil lies in the actors, the script, the bad cgi, and everyting else I forget in this list. This is seventies horror, but worse.

Clayton W (mx) wrote: [i]Chicago 10[/i] is not your typical documentary. The use of stylized animation and celebrity voice talents in the court scenes is very effective, but the excess of archival footage with little narration leads to a sense of no direction, and the events shown, while important, didn't seem affecting. I wish there had been more explanation and a greater focus on the actual men on trial, rather than so many shots of police brutality and such. Unique and bold to a point, and after that, typical and dull.

Earnestine b (jp) wrote: The one was not my cup of tea.

Angels V (fr) wrote: One of the most amazing, charming and wonderful movies of all time.

Brandon C (de) wrote: Im the only person I know of that has actually seen this underground comedy and it's a guilty pleasure of mine.

Blair K (ru) wrote: entertaining movie but corey feldman channeling michael jackson was so distracting. why the director let that go on i will never know but anyway... to me what helps this movie is the switching premise. i have always liked movies that are like that. corey haim is very good as usual. if you watch it for anything watch it for the story and for haim :)

Gordon S (au) wrote: classic george burns and classic film...

Tim S (es) wrote: This started out rather slowly, but kept building. It winds up getting more and more serious until it just goes flat-out silly at the very end - with an ending totally off-the-wall and completely insane that I have to give the filmmakers props for being so ballsy. It may not be perfect, but it's got some good things going for it.

Zachary C (ag) wrote: Just as good as the first one.

Darren G (au) wrote: Absorbing and thorough. Like a French film with subtitles - but without the subtitles :)