Goltzius and the Pelican Company tells the story of Hendrik Goltzius, a late 16th century Dutch printer and engraver of erotic prints. A contemporary of Rembrandt and, indeed, more celebrated during his life, Goltzius seduces the Margrave of Alsace into paying for a printing press to make and publish illustrated books. In return, he promises him an extraordinary book of pictures of illustrating the Old Testament’s biblical stories. Erotic tales of Lot and his daughters, David and Bathsheba, Samson and Deliah and John the Baptist and Salome. To tempt the Margrave further, Goltzius and his printing company will offer to perform dramatisations of these erotic stories for his court.
Hendrik Goltzius, a late 16th century Dutch printer and engraver of erotic prints, seduces the Margrave of Alsace into paying for a printing press to make and publish illustrated books. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Tim C (nl) wrote: as much as i like the movie... Miriam Yeung's performance is dreadful.
Molly C (es) wrote: Saw very little of it, so I don't think it is 100% fair to justify an opinion but from the first ten minutes I saw of it I didn't really think this film was my cup of tea!
Joetaeb D (ru) wrote: With a plot that serves of characters being total dicks to each other in misguided and unfunny humor. Deck the halls is a pointless Christmas film that could never get the family into the spirit
David B (ca) wrote: Not as good as the second, and no where near as great as the first, if only to make you be put off from themerides. Theirs still connection from the first two films but at the end of the day all the characters die. So it's somewhat pointless, the problem with the characters is they seem to be really stupid and cocky. Still good shocks though and good performances from the two leads. Original ways of gory deaths with the speciel effects gettign better, although the fact that you can only read the signs from a camera was a good twist and new but that is really it. It seems the directors/writers are finding more ways to put you off doing something. Not a bad sequel but if you've seen the rest your not missing much but theirs no harm in that. Give it a watch, not all horrors can stretch a concept and feel slightly fresh.
Artur C (jp) wrote: Stupid and useless sports bullshit with loads of bad acting.
Sanford R (de) wrote: Much better than expected!
Steven G (ca) wrote: Is there really such a thing as an "ordinary person?"
Michelle v (us) wrote: This is definintly elvis at his best.
Steve R (de) wrote: One of the better entires in the Carry On series. Well worth watching.
Stephanie B (ag) wrote: Had its funny moments but mostly pretty boring. Bad Mormon comedy...def dont recommend
Matthew Luke B (us) wrote: Now I do respect Tony Scott as a director as he directed a lot of movie in the past that I liked, but Domino is a giant mess of a movie that gave me a massive headache afterwards.
Kevin H (fr) wrote: What did I just watch? I spent 90 minutes of my precious life watching one of the dumbest movies I've ever seen. The concept of a serial killer clown is actually quite scary seeing is there are a lot of people who are afraid of clowns....but having it be a 300 pound nursery rhyme reciting killer clown makes a mockery of the genre. I still am wondering how the character Mark wasn't able to run away from the Clown...he's 300 pounds, he's gotta get tired eventually. The whole ending made me get up and literally say aloud "What did I just watch?" Apparently Brandon is Denise's cousin.... and they had got it on near the middle of the movie meaning he had sex with his cousin.....yeah that's something people want so see *shudders*.Another thing I found hilariously stupid was the opening scene where the clown stabs a woman and she says "What did you do?" Well bytch, what do you think he just did? The last thing that was stupidly funny was one second the main character was slapping the hitch-hiker and calling her a c*nt and then 5 minutes later saying violence isn't helping anything....did the writer of the script give the line to the wrong guy? None of this movie makes sense anyway.The movie was more or less a dumb low budget porno which I got sucked into buying (all 3.99)and got no entertainment out of it besides the sex scenes. I'm surprised the fat clown didn't join the orgy, would have fit right in. I hoped the movie would have some entertainment value like other B movies might have, but I was wrong. This is a moronic piece of garbage that's not even worth watching.1 out of 10
KJ P (it) wrote: Very oddly plotted and thought out, but it has points that make you chuckle, and other points where you want to punch yourself in the face! Both ways are very balanced out, therefore, I sort of liked it I guess!