Guns of Diablo

Guns of Diablo

Bronson and Russell are up against some bad guys who run the town to which the pair have gone for supplies. Bronson runs into an old girl friend, Oliver, who is now married to his enemy Merlin. Bronson had long ago broken Merlin's arm, and now the man wants revenge.

14-year-old Kurt Russell plays Jamie, an orphaned boy heading westward with a wagon train. Charles Bronson is a wagon scout Linc Murdock, who runs into difficulties when he meets old flame ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Guns Of Diablo (1964) - TBS (The Interceptor)Other43314 GB

Guns of Diablo torrent reviews

Chris P (gb) wrote: An interesting story that could have been something special in the right hands, but instead it's in writer Kevin Vanhook's hands, who thankfully doesn't direct. Instead, he hands the reigns over to David Flores, who has done such SciFi Channel classics as Boa vs. Python, SS Doomtrooper, and Lake Placid 2. Yeah, I give up.

Deriel D (de) wrote: tokusatsu anime...hope the live action one exist...

gary t (ca) wrote: WOW.....WOW....WOW.....JUST SEEN THIS MOVIE 4 THE 1ST TIME N THINK THAT THIS IS SUCH A BAD MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS NOTHING SPECIAL 2 WATCH, I THINK THAT SOME OF THE SCENES SHOULD HAVE BEEN CUT FROM THIS MOVIE AS I THINK THAT IT WENT ON TO LONG, ITS GOT A GOOD SOUNDTRACK THROUGHOUT THIS MOVIE......ITS NOT THAT ENJOYABLE MOVIE 2 WATCH, I THINK THAT THIS COULD HAVE BEEN CUT SHORTER AS I THINK THAT THIS MOVIE WENT ON TO LONG, I THINK THAT THE SCRIPT WAS REALLY WEAK THROUGHOUT THIS MOVIE, ITS GOT A GOOD SOUNDTRACK THROUGHOUT THIS MOVIE, BUT THIS IS NOT THAT GOOD OF A MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SUCH A BAD MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT COULD HAVE BEEN A LOT SHORTER AS SOME OF THE SCENES COULD HAVE BEEN CUT DOWN, IT IS NOT THAT GOOD OF A MOVIE 2 WATCH, I THINK THAT THIS IS A BIT OF A DULL MOVIE 2 WATCH,

Deidre S (ru) wrote: omg it was funny but i also thought he would do better a little more

p b (it) wrote: The King is in it :)

Alex K (au) wrote: This Film Got A ''Two Thumbs Down'' On Ebert & Roeper When They Reviewed This On Their Show And Was Given A One Star Rating From Northwest Herald Film Critic Jeffrey Westhoff.

James H (au) wrote: 3.5/10. Really stupid family film, very much aimed at the pre-teen crowd, adults will find it tedious and stupid. Very badly acted by several cast members, particularly Alana Stewart. She is dreadful. The "gorilla" has a very fake looking costume. Strictly for unintelligent children.

Pablo G (fr) wrote: A love story with its own Lynch kind of twist ith characters that are gpeculiar, strangely relatable, and some even plain scary. It is not completely understandable or explained in order to make it truly satisfying, but it is still filled with creative and unforgettable moments.

Raphael S (nl) wrote: Depois de ler muitas crticas a este filme comparado com o anterior, imagino que este deva ser excelente, porque gostei dessa nova verso. Algumas cenas muito bonitas, sequncias boas e a histria interessante, fazem valer assistir o filme.

Jason V (jp) wrote: A good surprise!1 of the movies of my hero I never saw before 2 days ago.Talking of Richard Bradford of course.;) XDOr maybe more B.W.:)I didn't know anything about this film he made the year of my favorite of all the times, Die Hard, 1st of the name; but I thought it was average, like some of his 1st movies I saw.And no, it's really funny, interesting, original... From Blake Edwards, it'd've been surprising if it wasn't funny at all.I don't like the things of those times, the cars, clothes, styles... but, if I prefer westerns in other sets and a bit older times, it was interesting to see a real western mixed with a buddy movie and cop-comedy.Another movie happening in those times I loved although all is Changeling, of the great Eastwood.Lol at how the Oscars' ceremony was.:DAnd I didn't see coming the reference to Chaplin, through the character of Alfie Alperin. After you see that, you realize that Alfie Alperin sounds like Charlie Chaplin.But so, considering the dangerous psychopath he is, I couldn't see a parallel with the great Charlot, till he put a moustache looking like Charlie's one, and a big hat, and is introduced as the Hobo (the Tramp being Chaplin's main character as you know) and make a short sketch with some funny moves and stunts in the Chaplin's style.

James H (nl) wrote: Lame 1980?s crap, not very original and certainly there is nothing special about it. The acting is fair, it?s not as funny as it intended it to be. Very ordinary and uninspiring. Notable though for Kathy Bates in an early appearance.

Christopher H (fr) wrote: This movie has its heart in the right place and I agree in tis political message but as a movie it is mediocre, over acting, bad acting and clichs made the movie barely watchable.

Trey L (fr) wrote: Honestly, I'm being generous giving it one whole star. However, if you have not seen it, I have to insist that you do whatever it takes to get your hands on a copy. Just look at that title.

Brooke Y (ca) wrote: Loved it. I love Danny Kaye.

Christopher B (ru) wrote: Another Hammer Film. Grade school science rolled into a horror flick - this is a perfect "creature feature".