Hari-Bhari: Fertility

Hari-Bhari: Fertility

Ghazala (Shabana Azmi) has been married to Munirmiya (Srivallabh Vyas) for several years, and has given birth to a daughter, Salma (Rajeshwari Sachdev) Munir is unhappy that Ghazala has ...

Ghazala (Shabana Azmi) has been married to Munirmiya (Srivallabh Vyas) for several years, and has given birth to a daughter, Salma (Rajeshwari Sachdev) Munir is unhappy that Ghazala has ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Hari-Bhari: Fertility torrent reviews

George B (mx) wrote: Seemed more like a student project for a film class. This did not hold my attention at all. Horrible acting, editing, and effects.

Roni F (gb) wrote: The human "question", or the human "issue", though slightly self-indulgent, pierces the heart with melancholic poetry and washed out photography. It points to the elephant in the room: the coldness of the monster inside all of us. Not for people in denial of the human condition.

darryl c (ca) wrote: this is a much weightier, in depth documentary of garbo's european and american careers, narrated by renowned swedish actress bibi andersson.

Leo L (it) wrote: Definitely wanna see!

Gregory W (fr) wrote: just ok ensamble cast

Leslie Anne F (au) wrote: Jackie and Owen have a a unique chemistry. It's not romance, but it's just something else.

Morten S (br) wrote: Staerkt og roerende drama, baseret paa virkelige haendelser. Bacon og Oldman er i topform.

WS W (nl) wrote: Sometimes I just can't help admiring Wong Jing's quick reaction to the market. A parody of [Basic Instinct] which took almost 70% either storyline or scenes from the original & still looking funny & amusing enough. The late Anita Mui was exactly Sharon Stone inside out.

Tracey c (es) wrote: Get out the popcorn and get ready for a really, deep-down funny movie. The reason I gave it only four stars is because one should know something about Holmes and Watson to really get the comedy in this movie. However, that aside, what makes this movie so special is the wonderful acting. One can tell that the two lead actors care about what they are doing, and that they had a great deal of fun making the movie. In short, this is real comedy from a group of actors that know what they are doing, and bring all their talent out for the viewer.

Jeff B (kr) wrote: Intriguing and beautiful Vittoria de Sica film takes place during the start of WWII and the racial laws set in fascist Italy. Wonderfully photographed (though the DVD isn't the greatest quality), it's a sad and thought provoking film about a family that tries to resist the fascism by staying in their garden and not be a part of the outside world. At times it is a bit confusing and too symbolic, but the message does get across. I'll need to have another look at this one sometime. But the film does stay with you after it's over.

Wes S (mx) wrote: Decent film. It was on MST3K, but I felt it was more of a 'it was available so we could I mean it's Godzilla.' There are some bad moments in the film, but I don't see it as truly bad. It's a bit of a cross between Godzilla being a hero and a villain, and Mothra makes a brief appearance as well. Interesting characters, decent but out there plot, and a fun Godzilla movie.

Devon B (kr) wrote: Stanley Kubrick's first feature film is also his least seen, mainly because until Kubrick's death, the film had been locked away in the vaults at his request. This should give you some idea as to the film's quality. It's not that Fear and Desire is a bad movie, it's just that it's still very amateurish (Kubrick was only 24 when he made it). Obviously, expectations wouldn't normally be high for a low budget, fifties movie about soldiers trapped behind enemy lines, but "directed by Stanley Kubrick" changes the nature of things quite a bit. Four soldiers from an "undetermined" country attempt to return to base after their plane goes down while on a reconnaissance mission. The four are of disparate personalities: the leader is pragmatic, the private is scared and on the verge of cracking, and then there's the gung ho sarge, who wants to take down a general. The group attempts to build a raft out of logs, they also kidnap a girl who was washing clothes in the river. They also kill some enemy soldiers with their bayonets and take their guns and dinner. They do some other things too. The characters with the disparate personalities do things and then react according to their personalities. It's weird, but the entire film feels like an extra long version of "The Twilight Zone" or perhaps "The Outer Limits" (two shows that would come about ten years after this film). Kubrick directs the action with a photographer's eye, but sometimes the acting just doesn't cut it and brings things down to unintentionally comical levels of maudlinism. It's all pretty standard fifties B-movie stuff.

Ajay D (gb) wrote: Truly fascinating. The movie binds the emotion with true life really well, not many movies can do that. You start to feel for the characters. The direction was very proper, loved it. The relation of the protagonist with other characters is depicted very nicely.

Irene S (ru) wrote: I love, love, love this movie. if you love to dance or watch people dance, love music, (freestyle, rave, and old school rap), if you love to watch people b-boying, then this a great movie to watch. it is a feel good movie with amazing dance moves, a tiny weeny serious side to the film but overall, I would buy the dvd and watch it again and again.

Spencer W (es) wrote: Sometimes a movie is just a movie. You go see it to escape your stressful life with your family and you don't feel like thinking a lot during it. It's a family movie and I think it served its purpose of entertaining the whole family. Although Stephen Hawking's family would be the exception.

Omar K (fr) wrote: 'The Godfather of Soul.?? No man earns this title if they can??t get the audience grooving and moving to the sound of their magic that comes in the form of music. James Brown, like Marlon Brando??s Vito Corleone, is a godfather, albeit to completely different areas of life, but with that title, as seen in the 1972 gangster classic, comes great influence and importance over the land. The only difference between James Brown??s life and Vito Corleone??s is that Brown is not fictional and has actually had an irrepressible impact on the world that he inhabited and the many generations that have come after. In a career that covered 60 years, Brown literally broke his way onto the national stage with his unique ability to enthral and entertain, and over time let the world stage know who he was, whilst influencing genres of music in the process. Get On Up does so well in emphasising to us the man behind the relentless performances and soulful music we all have come to admire and even love. This man was a master at making his effort count, as he was ceaseless in his attention to detail, tireless in his creation and recording of new music every year, dismissive of those around him and utterly ruthless in his quest to be great. Get On Up focuses on the life of James Brown from a young kid living in the woods with his bipolar-abusive parents, the formation of Brown??s friendship with Bobby Byrd, leading to the formation of the band The Famous Flames, to the formation of the one-man band James Brown, his national recognition as an artist and the drawbacks that came with his hardnosed attitude. Brown, by the look of this film, is a crazy, crazy man with one heck of a rasping voice and overly exhilarating powers of performing. With the help of its distinctive narrative format, Get On Up unravels the real James Brown by allowing us to understand how he was brought up, what motivated him, what moved him, the people close to him (if there were any) and how he lived a lonely life behind his fame. Chronologically, the film follows Brown??s life from 1993, to 1988, to the 60??s, all the way back to his childhood in 1939, to 1964, back to the 50??s, to 1973 and returning to the 90??s to conclude this biopic. It is an intriguing way to set the story up because Brown??s life is layered with different decades merged together, allowing us to see different stages of his life to understand the bigger picture. The intercutting of different moments in his life allow you to see a man who produced something of his life thanks to the harshness of his childhood rather than someone that became perhaps more evil and self-concerned as time went by, so it appears the filmmakers want to cherish the artist James Brown, not condemn him for his brutal assertiveness. For people that prefer storylines that are linear will be outraged, because with all the intercutting that goes on, audiences can become irritated for not seeing a flowing piece of cinema. With only one lead role under his belt in the baseball-picture 42, starring as James Brown would prove to be hard work, but not once does Chadwick Boseman relax in this virtuoso performance. Boseman has quickly been signed up by Marvel for the role of superhero Black Panther and this tells how daring a performance Boseman gave as ??the godfather of soul.?? Boseman carries the same physical intensity Brown evokes when he??s dancing, singing or even when he is his normal self. This truly is a special performance for no actor could have pulled off James Brown the way in which Boseman emphatically tackles the role. Nelsan Ellis stars as Bobby Byrd, the only person that sticks with Brown throughout the years. Ellis never emphasises himself until the end as he calmly keeps himself to himself allowing Brown to have the limelight. If there is one person Brown needn??t be ruthlessly controlling over it is Bobby Byrd, his long-time friend. The film ends with a performance of Brown dedicating a song to Byrd and his wife in the audience, revealing to us that he was the only man that had a connection to Brown??s life. Interestingly, Brown was born in 1933 dying in 2006, whilst Byrd was born in 1934 dying in 2007, both at the age of 73, symbolically representing that these two men were associated through time highlighting the route the film took as a vital one? or it could just be a plain coincidence! Octavia Spencer and Viola Davis play important womanly figures in the youthful life of Brown. They always provide audiences with fascinating performances and Get On Up is just another one. Spencer and Davis seem to be involved in every film that revolves around black culture, but luckily there is no Oprah Winfrey for once! Get On Up can get too overly dedicated to detailing the great artist that is James Brown and not the private side of his life as he got older. Only the investigation into his troubled childhood provides us with a root into the background of this character. Brown??s private life growing-up is not delved into enough depth therefore the events that are shown involving his family are somewhat brief. It would have been far more pleasing if equal time was spent understanding how James Brown came to be and the way in which he developed as the years went by. Everything is touched over providing Brown with a worthy biopic, but some elements of his life are too thinly represented to entirely embrace. From his excellent discography, the music of James Brown is integrated so well into the story as each song compliments the development of Brown as a person at that moment in his life. Brown??s endless flow of music is not to forget oh ??so good?? and ??so nice?? that it will make you ??get on up?? and want to enrich yourself further with James Brown history. History in the form of how other music legends perceived him, as in some moments Brown rubs shoulders with some up and coming greats of the industry, including The Rolling Stones. What is interesting is that whilst Brown hijacked The Rolling Stones?? performance in the 60??s for fear of being outshone, Mick Jagger produced this very film highlighting Brown??s untarnished legacy. This may be a film about one man??s life, but it definitely isn??t just a ??man??s world?? as all types of people will have been touched by this man??s rhythm and blues in the 20th century. For me this man made an impact on the world stage long before I was born, but the greatness of James Brown is that no matter when you live, his influence on culture is undeniable and will live on in history for the sheer fact that there is no one like him, ever. The Verdict: Get On Up serves as a fascinating tribute to the life of James Brown, whose ruthless attitude is superbly unravelled through the ardent vigour of his performances. ???????????????????? 7/10

Jason M (ca) wrote: A wonderful start to Indiana Jones.

Jennifer M (kr) wrote: very...raw, does that make sense?

Susanna M (fr) wrote: Who thinks up this shit?