Holiday Inn (1942) torrents full movies

#

Holiday Inn

At an inn which is only open on holidays, a crooner and a hoofer vie for the affections of a beautiful up-and-coming performer.

Holiday Inn is a great movie of Claude Binyon (screenplay), Elmer Rice (adaptation), Irving Berlin (idea). This movie was introduced in 1942. You can check list actors in this movies torrent, for example Bing Crosby, Fred Astaire, Marjorie Reynolds, Louise Beavers. There are many categories, such as Action, Comedy, Drama, Musical, Romance. Many people rated for this movie, Rate is 7.6 in www.imdb.com. We have a good movie torrents. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 100 minutes. Chich1Phat is funny uploader, he is very lovely. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Awesome', so what is your opinion. Do you know what are customers? Maria Ozawa is the best. I don't push my laptop screen. Share with your friends and watch this movie together . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

The music's the thing. Jim's supper club, Holiday Inn, is the setting for the chase by Hanover and manager Danny Reed. Lovely Linda Mason has crooner Jim Hardy head over heels, but suave stepper Ted Hanover wants her for his new dance partner after femme fatale Lila Dixon gives him the brush

Holiday Inn torrents

Holiday Inn full movie

Holiday Inn1942 torrent

Holiday Inn torrent, Holiday Inn movie torrents, download Holiday Inn full movie, Holiday Inn1942 torrents, download Holiday Inn1942 torrents, watch Holiday Inn movie, Holiday Inn englishsub, free download Holiday Inn movie, movie Holiday Inn torrent

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Holiday Inn720p4540803.87 MB

You may also like


Users reviews


DAN DONOVAN (ca)

THE FIRST MOVIE I WAS IN !


Dennis L (ag)

Fell flat despite the charismatic cast


Ethan P (jp)

Don't expect anything more than that and you'll enjoy yourself. I wanted to see cliched muscle boys punch things, and that's what I got


Fred T (jp)

Feels far ahead of its time. The sheer energy and the elegant pacing and give real weight to the film's theatrical nature. Though Enfants loses pace in its second installment it is still one of the most powerful and ambitious pieces of cinema I have seen


Hector C (kr)

muy divertida me encanto todo el enredo


John S (jp)

ive it a miss. The unbelievable saris of events continues to the end. The plot is actually ok to a point, there is a big stretch for you to buy into it. Unfortunately it was fairly bogus and generally unenjoyable. I will rent it. I stumbled upon thus film in the video shop last week and thought ooh a britflick how cool


Joshua F (es)

It's biggest sin though is taking away the faceless horror of the first film, instead presenting it as a stereotypically over-the-top evil preacher. but this sequel is unnecessary, and often contradictory to it's predecessor's continuity. . . It still has the original cast, and Jerry Goldsmith's musical score is a multiplying factor for the atmosphere


Luke B (au)

It's probably best as a stand alone watch inspired by curiosity, rather than a sit down laugh out loud film. There are some wonderful moments, the character of Freak Reaky certainly needs a resurrection. It's excellent first time film making, but only in retrospect. There's no witty dilalogue, and there are only a few glimpses of the Broken Lizard humour prevalent in their later offerings. The plot is thin and unlike their later efforts, tries hard to include all the troupe but ends up with bizarre sketchy subplots. Seeing the young and talented members of Broken Lizard in their humble origins is, in itself, great to watch. A decent college romance comedy that is surprisingly more in the former


M Z (nl)

The music is the only good thing. Completely disappointment


Padraig W (jp)

If it is not his best, it is part of the canon of a very fine director. He has integrity. Lumet does not hide behind a soft ending. It is, however, sincere, honest and forthright. This is not Lumet's best. Lena Olin is a blank. Ian Holm, a fine actor, is playing a cypher. Who would have thought that? Other actors do not come across well at all. Dreyfuss seems to calm and relax Garcia. He's too strident in almost all scenes, except the couple of delicate scenes with Dreyfuss that are nicely played. There is little going on inside, and he does not connect well. This is from the latter day Pacino school of acting. When he is angry, he shouts. He seems to go to deep emotion too fast to be credible. Andy Garcia does not find the emotional core of his character. The acting, for once, does not come off either. This has the odd effect of individual scenes seeming rushed, while the overall pace drags. The pacing is sluggish, and the acting under-rehearsed. Nothing that follows finds the same dramatic force. However, after the trial scenes of the first 40 minutes are over, the movie feels over too. I hesitate to say misconceived, because it is clear that Lumet was after the theme of the moral hazard associated with the DA's office. The story is disjointed. These are elements, though, and not enough of them coalesce to make a satisfactory whole. The film is also blessed with a wonderful score that imbues the film with a tragic dignity that the film does not otherwise achieve. A wonderful performance. He does not push the camera, or do his usual "look at me" acting routine, and demonstrates that by doing less he achieves so much more. Richard Dreyfuss is a wonderful surprise here. Yes, there are good elements in the film. The film is flat and tired. Night Falls on Manhattan is not one of them. This is testimony to Lumet's best films. Being an actor's director, who develops an ensemble approach to working with actors on set, the performances are often passionate and sublime. His best films on the theme - Serpico, The Verdict and Q&A - have an edgy passion, earnest enthusiasm and shrewd intelligence. Sidney Lumet has returned to crime, police and the justice system a number of times in his career