It's been five years since Hiccup and Toothless successfully united dragons and vikings on the island of Berk. While Astrid, Snotlout and the rest of the gang are challenging each other to dragon races (the island's new favorite contact sport), the now inseparable pair journey through the skies, charting unmapped territories and exploring new worlds. When one of their adventures leads to the discovery of a secret ice cave that is home to hundreds of new wild dragons and the mysterious Dragon Rider, the two friends find themselves at the center of a battle to protect the peace. Now, Hiccup and Toothless must unite to stand up for what they believe while recognizing that only together do they have the power to change the future of both men and dragons. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
|Download||How to Train Your Dragon 2||1080p||352||82||1.65 GB|
|Download||How to Train Your Dragon 2||720p||159||66||810.42 MB|
|Download||How to Train Your Dragon 2||3d||148||46||1.65 GB|
You may also like
How to Train Your Dragon 2 torrent reviews
Minh N (de) wrote: I never write movie reviews, however, I could not just sit idly by while this movie gets so many praises. As a disclaimer, in general, I mostly agree with RT reviews when it comes to movies, especially, when movies actually ARE good (The Godfather, Once Upon A Time in the West, Edge of Tomorrow, Die Hard, Rear Window, etc to name a few from various genres). So I'm not writing this for sake of going against the flow. The movie has no real story or plot. Just a movie following the lives of two individuals, mainly Adele the primary character, who becomes attracted to another girl and explores her sexuality. If you're a moviegoer expecting an engrossing compelling story with intense drama, this is not the movie for you. The movie really drags on for 3 hours, and a lot of scenes really serve no purpose, or at least not in an interesting way. It feels more like a soap opera/documentary in movie format, with some explicit sex scenes. If that is your cup of tea, and a soap opera lover (apparently is the case for all the positive critics on here), then by all means, enjoy this movie.A lot of reviewers praise the acting, but what acting? The actors/actresses, no offense and safe to say, are practically playing themselves or a version of themselves. The characters are one dimensional, not interesting, and are just your typical everyday teenager/young adult from France. GOOD acting, is method acting (see Marlon Brando, Gary Oldman, Al Pacino, Meryl Streep, Viggo Mortensen, Vincent Cassel (french), hell even most young recent British and American talent in drama movies) and playing characters that are different and outside your comfort zone while doing so convincingly. You're not really acting when all you're doing is playing yourself. Last thing, a lot of reviewers praise how beautiful this movie is shot. If by beautiful,you mean shooting the movie in glorious 1080p with the most up to date camera technology (movie is from 2013), extreme closeups, etc. then sure, it's beautiful. Want beautiful cinematography? See any movie from Sergio Leone (50s-60s era), Stanley Kubrick, Francis Ford Coppola, Alfonso Cuaron. TV shows like House of Cards have beautiful cinematography (with better acting and story to boot) that rival or improve on this movie in every aspect.Sorry if this review comes off negative nancyish. However, the movie was just not enjoyable and quite frankly boring. It was hard to sit through the second half of the movie, when it was: more of the same, but for another hour and a half.My 2 cents.
David C (mx) wrote: I've seen a lot of weird movies on Netflix and this is the weirdest one of them all. I've always liked talking to old men myself because I thought I could learn something from listening to their experiences. It was an odd movie.
Evan H (us) wrote: It's a cheesy gay love story that has a very thin plot line. It drags on without much happening until the end. Plenty of eye candy...that's about it!
Hope V (nl) wrote: Not the *best* Merlin movie I've seen, but I've also seen worse. This movie has an interesting portrayal of Merlin, he's a little bit on the crazy side. However, for the most part the movie was lackluster and inconsistent in minor details.
Vaibhav K (us) wrote: Ultimate entertainment!
Rikard B (au) wrote: Helt meningsls rulle, inte dlig som s men helt utan andemening!
Nando V (mx) wrote: Preying on your taste for gore and the black humor Andrew Divoff sometimes cleverly achieves (even when most of is based on the victim's wishes that ultimately turns into their gory demise): W2 is a cheesy step back from it's prequel.
Joby D (br) wrote: I loved the TV series, but, oddly, I haven't seen this yet...is it any good?
Omar Q (gb) wrote: I liked it, it was not to bad, had a great amount of good, a great movie.
Little D (au) wrote: This movie had some potential, but was ultimately disappointing. The "voices in the head" stuff was really cheesy, as well as the ending with the young boy being abused by his mom and then hearing those same voices. As usual, the mother has to be blamed for everything..... Based on what I'd read about this film, I was expecting it to be a lot more disturbing and gory than it actually was. I guess the terrible acting and bad special effects were what made the first death scene not too disturbing (it just looked so fake). The main actor's line delivery sounded really, really awkward and unnatural the majority of the time, and every time the priest guy spoke I cracked up. With better actors, less misogyny, and a less cheesy ending, this film could have possibly been good.
i C (nl) wrote: 5/10Revenge Movie is a misleading, cause it really isnt. its not like bourne-chase, its a quiet chase, with motorcycle and best friend driving through the american west, visit family and making some money. Every 10 min starts a country song, pretty landscape pictures, instagram filters. Very few actions scenes, should be mentioned, because the description of the movie is misleading. Not a bad debut and its not a bad movie but also nothing special