Hum Hain Rahi Pyar Ke
Rahul Malhotra (Aamir Khan) is the manager of the heavily in debt family business. He is also the guardian of his dead sister's mischievous kids. Rahul hires Vaijayanti (Juhi Chawla) as governess. Vaijayanti is a runaway from home as she does not want to marry the man her orthodox family has chosen for her. Predictably, Rahul and Vaijayanti fall in love. Maya (Navneet Nishan), a rich girl in love with Rahul tries to ruin his family and his business, but all ends happily.
- Stars:Aamir Khan, Juhi Chawla, Sharokh Bharucha, Kunal Khemu, Baby Ashrafa, Tiku Talsania, Mushtaq Khan, K.D. Chandran, Javed Khan, Veeru Krishnan, Navneet Nishan, Zubaida, Robin Bhatt, Ramesh Goyal, Merlin Lucian,
- Director:Mahesh Bhatt,
- Writer:Robin Bhatt (dialogue), Robin Bhatt (screenplay), Robin Bhatt (script), Robin Bhatt (story), Aamir Khan (screenplay), Sujit Sen (story)
Rahul Malhotra (Aamir Khan) is the manager of the heavily in debt family business. He is also the guardian of his dead sister's mischievous kids. Rahul hires Vaijayanti (Juhi Chawla) as ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Hum Hain Rahi Pyar Ke torrent reviews
(us) wrote: It is PULP FICTION in a Belgium tourism video. Expect shiploads of profanity and violence; and a gunman principle on killing a child but little of a gratifying narrative.
(ru) wrote: There are intriguing issues swirling around the film, but [director] Kofman never brings it to a boil, never finds the deeper, truer meaning inside the ideas he is grappling with.
(gb) wrote: a confusing version of one of china's most frequently told stories
(it) wrote: Not a very good introduction to Fishburne for me. Stephen Baldwin (with 'Usual Suspects' excluded) is ehhh... as usual.
(de) wrote: theres a good cast javier bardem(in really tight jeans!) jordi molla(my favorite spanish actor) and penelope cruz(i still have my doubts about her acting but) it seems sorta low budget, but it has all the elemnts to make a weird, u have to talk about movie. its an acquired taste.
(nl) wrote: A more avant-garde new age type film that isn't necessarily plot driven left me confused through the entire length. Though I found many scenes entertaining I definitely didn't feel satisfied and overall thought the film to be mediocre at best.
(fr) wrote: A dark, star-studded melodrama directed by Robert Siodmak that's overlong, talky, and very preachy. But with a surprisingly literate screenplay by Christopher Isherwood, it offers some fascinating character complexity that's much more than you'd expect from an old-fashioned Hollywood costume drama, helped along by Sidomak's taut direction and excellent black and white cinematography by George Folsey. Too uneven to really be a classic, but very interesting despite its flaws.
(au) wrote: Fun and Cyclops didn't play second fiddle ? there must be some mistake, but I like it
(es) wrote: Hurt and Costner performances are enjoyable and the idea of the movie is good but that's almost all that there is to see. Specially, Moore's story and character are quite expendable, not adding anything to the main story but noise.
(fr) wrote: Okay, 93% on Rotten Tomatoes? NOW I want to see it.