Huo Yuan-Jia

Huo Yuan-Jia

The story of "Fok Yun Gap" also know as "Hou Yuan Chia" one of China's greatest marital artists.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:89 minutes
  • Release:1982
  • Language:Mandarin,Cantonese
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:china,   martial arts,   kung fu,  

This is a powerful, yet fictionalized life story of Huo Yuan Chia, a real kung fu master in Southern China who brought respect to the populace and allowed kung fu to be taught to all Chinese during a time of revolt and low morale in the country's history. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Huo Yuan-Jia torrent reviews

Jane O (gb) wrote: 2 stars out of the 3 for the music

Leon B (de) wrote: Lords Of London(2014)Plot:Unconventional British gangster movie directed by Antonio Simoncini. London gangster Tony Lord (Glen Murphy) is forced to reflect on his past misdeeds when he is transported back to 1950s Italy, where his mother and father originally met and fell in love. Knowing the damaging nature of his father (Christopher Hatherall)'s future wrongdoings, Tony takes the opportunity to stop his mother (Serena Iansiti) from leaving Italy with him and changes the course of history as a result...Review:It really gets on my nerves when people put a picture on poster to promote a movie, which has totally nothing to do with the film. Ray Winstone is only in a couple of scenes, and he doesn't hold a gun in none of them. Also the whole film is set in Italy so I don't know why they changed the title from Lost in Italy, which was more appropriate, to Lords Of London. Anyway, I found the movie to be quite boring and sketchy. It's one of those films which go back and forth in time, which I hate, and it doesn't really make much sense. After watching the guy wall around the town over and over again, without anyone actually noticing him, I just got bored of the whole thing and I lost interest. The storyline needed a lot more work, but the actors weren't that bad. Personally I thought that the film was a massive disappointment and I was totally misled by the poster.Round-Up:Ray Winstone is really good when he is playing the old swearing, angry, cockney gangster roles, but he was wasted in this movie. He should have played the lead. I liked the old Italian guy, who brought some light to the movie, but the storyline was appalling. I think that I'm right by thinking that the main character was in limbo, but I don't know why the director had to make the whole think so complicated. If he was trying to be clever with the storyline, then he done a really bad job. Anyway, that aside, the music seemed like it was done on someone's phone, which does start to become a bit tedious whilst watching the film, and the ending could have explained what the hell was you watching the last hour and a half.Budget: $3.4millionWorldwide Gross: N/AI recommend this movie to people who are into there flashback and forth type of movies about a guy who wakes up in Italy. 2/10

Samitha B (ag) wrote: The story of an indestructible man. Enjoyable though.

Jennie R (ru) wrote: When I started watching this, I knew I had seen it before but I guess it was so bad that I blocked most of it out of my mind. This movie is another version of "The Uninvited" only tries to throw in something a little different to not seem like the same movie. Well, it does nothing but make the movie confusing. Let me give credit to Tom Sizemore. He does a great job with his role. Very convincing.

Antonios V (nl) wrote: Mindless killing, some ok action, weak story.....

Christopher M (fr) wrote: Horrible, don't watch it. Even if you like Chevy, it's a total boring disappointment.

Frances Ann A (it) wrote: One of the worst Hollywood historical epics I've ever seen. I disliked it as a teenager, despite loving to see movies set in the Middle Ages. However, recent comments I had seen led me to give it another try, this time attempting an open mind. Unfortunately, I find the dialogue unnatural and stilted, the characters essentially undeveloped, the action terribly slow, the direction wooden, and the whole production very static. It's way too long, with a ton of shots of people riding places on horses, and although the horsiness is fun, enough is enough, especially when you have to listen to the same bombastic military music continuously through these scenes. Sophia Loren seems to have only two faces: pouting and glamour-smile. While none of the cast looks as if they have anything sensible to say, Loren is almost laughably unconvincing. Heston looks embarassed to be in the film, as do most of the actors. Page is good as the Princess Uracca (sp?). Unless you just want to see a lot of Hollywood spectacle and don't demand much in a story, give this a pass.

Ming Siu G (ca) wrote: It's never grittily realistic, as most war films are nowadays (hell, it was made in 1938, so...). But it is quietly funny, and understatedly moving, and most of all, very very humane. Masterful direction and performances.

Jill R (fr) wrote: I really did love this movie it's very underrated it is stupid but it's really funny and had heart this doesn't deserve the flack it has got a very good comedy that's worth watching Grade A-

Peter S (br) wrote: Dirty Harry's in New Orleans.

Nayurin C (fr) wrote: A good movie, with the feel and energy of Brasil. The music is the high point.