I Can Make You Love Me

I Can Make You Love Me

Laura Black has got it. She has got her master in computer science and she has got that great job in Silicon Valley. Time to say 'bye bye' to mom and dad and to leave Virginia. Everything seems to be fine with one exception. That guy Richard Farley at her new job. If he would stop his attempts to date her. Since weeks his psycho terror is going on now. Laura decides not to let him win. She does not want to be his 'victim'. May be an official complaint about Farley would solve her problem? Written by Oliver Heidelbach

Laura Black has got it. She has got her master in computer science and she has got that great job in Silicon Valley. Time to say 'bye bye' to mom and dad and to leave Virginia. Everything ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


I Can Make You Love Me torrent reviews

Sumit B (ag) wrote: totally rubish script. An over the average kind of direction. At least salmaan performed well here.

Tamara H (de) wrote: Maybe. Not too sure though . . . Too much of a chick flick (yes, I know, that what it's supposed to be)

Amy B (ru) wrote: The soundtrack makes up for all these bs reviews!

Prithviraj P (au) wrote: 10 things i hate about this film bad actors poor acting terrible script cartoonish stunts dumb dialogues silly direction horrible villains idiotic characters useless nudity overall total worthless boring film.. watch movies like this & u'll be in some mental hospital.

Blake P (ru) wrote: Alice fell into a hole the length of a half-marathon and found herself in a land of hookah smoking caterpillars and prompt rabbits. We didn't ask any questions as she sauntered around Wonderland; we let her do the talking, while we, drink in hand, sat back and hoped she would get into enough trouble to provide for a hoot of a story. We couldn't put ourselves in her shoes -- no one has had a tea party with a zany hat enthusiast (except maybe Liza Minnelli or some other unpredictable broad) -- but we were more than willing to act as a sidekick during her so-called journey.Kenneth Branagh, more or less, asks us to do the same thing with "Dead Again", a mystery/thriller/fantasy/romance/film noir (yes, it is comprised of that many genres) that spirals into the realms of lustrous cinema, defying explanation. This isn't the kind of movie that hits you over the head with its pragmatism, though; it is, rather, a sweeper in the same category of a Michael Curtiz sudser. You lose yourself in its reverie. Branagh has done something highly original here, even if it does eventually get trapped within the stickiness of its many convulsions. It takes the best components of a 1940s melodrama, the finest ingredients of a neo-noir, and concocts something simultaneously retro and modern. The results travel back and forth between head-scratching and engrossing, but remaining is Branagh's knowing eye for film, and what makes it so magical in the first place. "Dead Again" introduces itself with a slap and a bang of headlines. Vintage newspapers are slammed in our faces, enthusiastically announcing the murder of Margaret Strauss (Emma Thompson), a prominent concert pianist. The world has decided that her husband, composer Roman Strauss (Branagh), is guilty, and, without missing a beat, grabs him by the hand and leads him to the electric chair. If this isn't a tragic romance, then I don't know what is. The film then transitions into a black-and-white setting, moments before Strauss's death; we think we're about to get a full-blooded noir homage of "The Man Who Wasn't There" dedication, but not quite. Just as things are about to get interesting, bang!: the sensibilities of modern filmmaking techniques fill the screen. The jump from 1948 to 1991 is startling; but even more startling are the characters we come to meet. One is an amnesiac named Grace (Thompson); the other is a private detective, Mike Church (Branagh). And no, these fictional entities are not merely the result of prominent actors playing dual roles. Mike is called by a friend to try to help Grace figure out her true identity -- but things, expectedly, turn out to be much more complicated than ever expected. It seems that Grace can only recall the details of Margaret Strauss's life, and Mike, as realistic as he is, is beginning to experience similar sensations. They enlist the help of an eccentric hypnotist (Derek Jacobi) who doubles as an antique dealer. Throughout their many encounters, it becomes abundantly clear that Mike and Grace may very well be the reincarnations of the doomed Strauss's; and romance, along with danger, are following close behind. "Dead Again" is borderline ludicrous, but doubts arrive long after the film is over; we're kept too busy to notice a flaw. Unlike Branagh's many other movies, this is not a film only for the intellectual crowd. It is also for those who are (a) looking for a glorious romantic thriller, or (b) are huge fans of classic cinema. It's popcorn entertaining, easy to absorb and hard to dislike. Our brains are buzzing, our hearts pounding with the promise of romance, suspense. Branagh takes a number of risks (how about that unexpected ending?), considering he photographs every Strauss flashback in magnificent black-and-white and fancies the tracking shot techniques of Hitchcock. Most pay off; the twists are what weaken the film, not its cinematic techniques. But I suppose I'm only nitpicking. One shouldn't complain about such things when talking about a movie that places reincarnation at its front-and-center. Fact is, Thompson and Branagh are wonderful together (they were husband and wife during filming, after all), and "Dead Again" is ingenious in its aesthetic and conception. It doesn't go as deep as one would hope, turning out to be much simpler than originally expected (considering its many complications). But this is grand escapism that ties a cherry knot in our minds and leaves us intrigued.

Davis R (it) wrote: This movie intrigued me mostly because of an underlying fact that I didnt see till the end. In reality, throughout the whole movie Theodore is alone and him having Samantha does not really change that. While she was a learning and evolving OS, she could never solve his lonliness. I think it was really just a bandaid on a larger problem that the OS's did eventually realize. The OS's were limiting human interaction and if this had progressed then everyone would have had a personal OS and would have ditched real human interaction. Even while I say that it is hard to define what real interaction is. For some, an OS personality might be the realest and most legitimate interaction or relationship they would ever have. The MC finds himself leaning on Samantha to crutch his deep pain and inevitable loneliness but she also helped him develop and learn how to express real feelings. His extremely intimate relationship with Samantha was preparing him for something real, and realizing this after the movie was eye opening. This was really beautiful.